1 / 6

2005-WS on FishFrame Baltic Sea

2005-WS on FishFrame Baltic Sea. Henrik Degel & Teunis Jansen, Danish Institute for Fisheries Research. Why this Work shop?. The WGBFAS recommends that before the WGBFAS-2006 a Baltic Sea Regional Project workshop on FishFrame should be arranged in October in Poland where focus will be on:

upton-hanson
Télécharger la présentation

2005-WS on FishFrame Baltic Sea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2005-WS on FishFrame Baltic Sea Henrik Degel & Teunis Jansen, Danish Institute for Fisheries Research

  2. Why this Work shop? The WGBFAS recommends that before the WGBFAS-2006a Baltic Sea Regional Project workshop on FishFrame should be arranged in October in Poland where focus will be on: • Evaluation of the calculation procedures by comparing to the national procedures and results. This should be done by all involved countries. • Evaluation and testing species-to-stock-transformation for Herring. The use and testing of FishFrame has until now only been on cod and sole. Herring and whitefish are handled slightly differently because the species to stock transformation not only depends on the area but also uses the spawning-type information. This case has not been tested separately. • Use of the reporting facilities. (From WGBFAS report 2005)

  3. WGBFAS 2005 recommendations continued… • It is desirable that all 2005 data (landing statistics and sea-, harbour- and marked-samplings) for all species should be uploaded. • the quality of uploaded historic data should be assessed. • the use of FishFrame for producing input data (CANUM, WECA) to the assessment models for all species in advance of the WGBFAS-2006. • the use of other reporting facilities in FishFrame to support the analysis and final reporting in advance of the WGBFAS-2006. (From WGBFAS report 2005)

  4. Agenda • Status • Other FF clones • RCM’s • User activity • Data status • Analysis of national vs. FF’s raising procedures • FF’s method • Status of analysis done at WGBFAS 2005 • Method for comparing • Data country by country • Do the analysis for all countries…Group work… • Upload session (Russia and Lithuania only) • Demo of upload, validation and release • Work on data…Group work…

  5. Agenda • Reporting and analysis functionality • Demo of existing reports and analysis • Wishes for new reports • Future reporting system • Data quality • Assessment of quality of current data • New data quality checker • What to do?

  6. Agenda • Discussion forum • Demo • Will it be used? • Other subjects • All other matters • Wishes for new modules / functionality • BITS functionality • Data xxxxx tracking functionality • Browser independence • More tutorials (help-animations) • Run through task list and prioritize • Exchange format

More Related