240 likes | 509 Vues
2004 AIA SPRING CONFERENCE NAVAIR GOALS AND DIGITAL TECHNICAL DATA. DAVE PAULING Deputy Assistant Commander for Logistics NAVAIR 3.0 12 FEB 2004. NAVAIR’s Vision and Goals. We provide cost-wise readiness and dominant maritime combat power to make a great Navy/Marine Corps team better.
E N D
2004 AIA SPRING CONFERENCENAVAIR GOALS AND DIGITAL TECHNICAL DATA DAVE PAULING Deputy Assistant Commander for Logistics NAVAIR 3.0 12 FEB 2004
NAVAIR’s Vision and Goals We provide cost-wise readiness and dominant maritime combat power to make a great Navy/Marine Corps team better. • Balance Current and Future Readiness • Reduce Cost of Doing Business • Improve Agility • Ensure Alignment • Implement Fleet-Driven Metrics Outcome Focus Measurable
PM OFFICE PM OFFICE N PM OFFICE A V R SupportEquipment Weapons I I R = E-T P Naval Aviation Cost-Wise Readiness CONOPS • “Cost-Wise Readiness” • Optimized Cycle Times • Optimized Failure Rates • Integrated Budgets • “Readiness at Any Cost” • Degraded Cycle Times • Degraded Failure Rates • Stove piped Budgets TYCOM / OPNAV Fleet PROGRAMS Reliability, Maintainability, Inventory, Usage, And Readiness Data Products & Support Defense Planning Guide/ Fleet Readiness Plan Entitlements Airframe Avionics Training Propulsion Core Technologies N A V A I R Executive Cost-wise Readiness Integration Team (ECRIT) AIRSpeed Modeling and Simulation Airframes Management Board (AFMB) Propulsion Management Board (PMB) Weapons Team Support Equipment Team Component Program Management Board (CPMB) Human Systems Integration Management Board (HSIMB) Readiness Enablers
Product Commodity Line “Quick-Looks” • Product Line ENTITLEMENT by T/M/S • “Should Be” Goal • “As Is” Current Status • Product Line RELIABILITY by T/M/S • MTBF or Time on Wing • “Should Be” Goal • “As Is” Current Status • Product Line MAINTAINABILITY by T/M/S • TAT or Time to Repair • “Should Be” Goal • “As Is” Current Status • Integrated BUDGET by T/M/S • Fiscal Summary that answers the questions “How much?” and “So what?”
Where Are We Today? CURRENT & FUTURE READINESS REDUCE COST OF DOING BUSINESS IMPROVE AGILITY ENSURE ALIGNMENT IMPLEMENT FLEET-DRIVEN METRICS
Integration of Goals Technical Technical Logistics Logistics • Fleet Support • Engineering Investigations • Reliability Centered Maintenance • Maintenance Plan / Processes • Tech Manuals Fleet Issue PPC/ Technical Data Health of the Fleet, Safety, Affordable Readiness • Technical Integrity • Analysis/ Test /Fix • Predict/Prevent Fleet Technical Problems • Solve Fleet Revealed Technical Problems Hardware Condition Feedback Build Spec / Processes PPC/ Qualified Repair Hardware Condition Feedback • Repair Execution • O/I/D Level Repair • Incorporate Configuration Changes • Incorporate Qualified Repairs • Repair to Build Spec/Processes Industrial Industrial
Technical • Life Management • Reliability Centered • Maintenance (RCM) • Design Changes • Engineering • Investigations • Failure Modes/ • Effects • Logistics • Publications • Parts Forecasting • Inventory Tracking • Build Specs • Configuration Tracking • Industrial • Industrial Process • Depot/I-Level (1A5A, FHP) • Facilities/Capital Equipment (1A5A) • Parts Forecasting (NWCF) • Depot/I-Level Production (1A5A, FHP) CH-46/T58 Engine Example Out ofTune Harmony • 300 Engines Repaired per year • 108 Engines Repaired per year • 600 Eng req’d to meet CNO goals • 390 Eng req’d to meet CNO goals • 400 hour MTBR • 1,000 hour MTBR T58-GE-402 T58-GE-402 • $700/Flight Hour • $380/Flight Hour • $165K/Repair • $250K/Repair Integrated Approach in HARMONY With Goals!
DIGITAL DATA’S ROLE IN ENABLING GOALS CURRENT & FUTURE READINESS REDUCE COST OF DOING BUSINESS IMPROVE AGILITY ENSURE ALIGNMENT How are data/digital data efforts aligned with NAVAIR’s goals? IMPLEMENT FLEET-DRIVEN METRICS
DIGITAL DATA’S ROLE IN ENABLING GOALS • Quality of data • Current • Accurate • Usable • One authoritative data source • Accessibility of data • Increase process efficiency • Improve cycle times • Interoperable among services and allies • IETM/Viewer standards • Enable data re-use across products • Measurable cost-wise outcomes CURRENT & FUTURE READINESS REDUCE COST OF DOING BUSINESS IMPROVE AGILITY ENSURE ALIGNMENT IMPLEMENT FLEET-DRIVEN METRICS
Quality of data • One authoritative data source • Accessibility of data • Increase process efficiency • Interoperable among services and allies • Enable data re-use across products DIGITAL DATA: READINESS ENABLER CURRENT & FUTURE READINESS
Quality of data • One authoritative data source • Accessibility of data • Increase process efficiency • Interoperable among services and allies • IETM/Viewer standards • Enable data re-use across products • Measurable cost-wise outcomes DIGITAL DATA: COST REDUCTION ENABLER REDUCE COST OF DOING BUSINESS
One authoritative data source • Accessibility of data • Increase process efficiency • Interoperable among services and allies DIGITAL DATA: AGILITY ENABLER IMPROVE AGILITY
Accessibility of data • Interoperable among services and allies • IETM/Viewer standards • Enable data re-use across products • Measurable cost-wise outcomes DIGITAL DATA: ALIGNMENT ENABLER ENSURE ALIGNMENT
One authoritative data source • Accessibility of data • Measurable cost-wise outcomes DIGITAL DATA: METRICS ENABLER IMPLEMENT FLEET-DRIVEN METRICS
2000 16,000 MILSTRIP B/O 2400 TMs out of stock Heavily paper & raster TMAPS in infancy 28,000 TPDRs 50+ mo TPDR cycletime No XML capability IETM Look & Feel loosely defined Fleet confusion Proprietary IETMs limited to CD distribution 2004 3,127 MILSTRIP B/O 552 TMS out of stock (w/demands) 11,000+ TMs on website TMAPS healthy & robust 11,000 TPDRs 32 mo TPDR cycletime Delivering XML toolkit, content management system in work AIA/Tri-Services finalizing IETM Look and Feel definition Defined TM authoritative sources Web-based access via JATDI to proprietary IETMs NAVAIR Progress • Goal • Zero Backorders • Zero Out of Stock • 18,000 TMs on web • Processes web-enabled • 6000 TPDRs in pipeline • 12-15 mo TPDR cycletime • Robust program toolkit • Consistent look and feel • for all fleet data products • Non-proprietary web- • enabled access to all • electronic authoritative • data sources
IETMs … Contributing to Cost-wise Readiness Data from F-18 and H-60 MAINTENANCE TASKS RATIO IN MINUTES
768 800 530 600 445 339 322 400 306 TAT 237.8 254 226 225 208 205 180 173 166 168 167 122 120 200 111 119 55 23 0 PLATFORM TURN AROUND TIME (TAT) PER PLATFORM F404-GE-402A F404-GE-400A T700-GE-401CL F110-GE-400 T700-GE-401C T700-GE-401CX T56-A-427P T700-GE-401L J52-P-408A T700-GE-401 T700-GE-401X T58-GE-402 F402-RR-406B T58-GE-16 T64-GE-419 T64-GE-416/A T56-A-14P F402-RR-408A TF34-GE-400B T56-A-16P T56-A-425P T64-GE-413 AVERAGE TAT
IETM EFFECT ON TAT MAINTENANCE DAYS % OF TAT APPLICABLE TO MAINTENANCE
POTENTIAL IMPROVED TAT USING IETMS 9 Fewer Engines Req’d 14 Fewer Engines Req’d MAINTENANCE DAYS % OF TAT APPLICABLE TO MAINTENANCE
Pay-off to Cost-wise Readiness • Decreased RFI Req’ts • Decreased inventory • Decreased cost IETM MMH Avoidances Overall TAT Reductions
Aviation Logistics Board Planned initiatives: • Joint Service Technical Manual Processes and Requirements Management • Joint Technical Manual Acquisition Guidance • Class 4 IETM Viewer Solution(s)/Standards • Opportunities for AIA participation • Investigate industry/commercial best practices (AIA) • Provide basis for Government/Industry partnership
ARE WE IN STEP WITH THE VISION AND GOALS? We provide cost-wise readiness and dominant maritime combat power to make a great Navy/Marine Corps team better. How do we quantify IETM cause and effect outcome on cost-wise readiness? Measurable Outcome Focus