Navigating Higher Education Trends for Future Success
110 likes | 237 Vues
Explore the evolving landscape of higher education trends, from student statistics to technological advancements, to meet the needs of today's learners and scholars effectively.
Navigating Higher Education Trends for Future Success
E N D
Presentation Transcript
External Factors = UA Campus Statistic = Global Statistic
General User Population and Expectations • Desire for self-sufficiency • Desire for speed • Desire for real-time help and services • Collaboration and multitasking are the norm • Beyond text: visual, multimedia, interactive • Remote use rising; in-library use falling (40% off-campus; 40% on campus; 20% in library building)
Students • Enrollment up but more slowly than predicted • In 2001, 58% of students worked 11 or more hours a week at a job; 25% studied or did homework 11 or more hours a week • Between 15 – 20% of students study abroad • Increasing number of students with physical disabilities • National average four-year student-loan debt in 2002 was $18,900 • 89% begin research with a search engine; 2% with a library web site. • 45% come to the library to study or use a computer; 30% to get research help or get copies of journal articles.
Faculty / Research • Increased expectations for grants and outside funding • Funded research more than doubled in last 10 years • Doctoral / Master’s degrees awarded up 37% in last 10 years • Increased collaboration across departments and colleges • Student / faculty ratio has crept up in last five years to 18:1; 15% of classes have 50 or more students
University of Arkansas • Inadequate state funding • Increased competition from within state • Decentralized technology infrastructure • Space limitations • Increased enrollments • Diversity initiatives • Growing distant or hybrid programs; many at graduate / professional levels
Higher Education • Consumer model • Accountability and assessment • Increased emphasis on retention and student experience • Corporate providers and competition • Average cost of attending college is up 35% over the last five years. • Increased regional collaboration (SEC group)
State of Arkansas • K-12 needs predominate • Capital needs for higher education have gone unfunded • Large number of colleges for population served • Northwest region growth • Large corporate foundations • Enhanced fiber infrastructure (ARE-ON)
Technology • Open source and collaborative software • Security and authentication challenges • Specialized skills and training needed: instructional design, media, programming • Preservation and format migration • Hammers in search of nails (social software, blogging, wikis, project management, etc.)
Publishing and Scholarly Communication • Quality, free content continues to proliferate • Open access model still maturing • Structure of collections budgets makes migration to electronic products difficult (monographs funds vs. serials funds) • Ebook pricing and format models still evolving • More academic content published as media (audio, video) rather than text • Digital Rights Management models are between consumer and publisher; no place for library • Mergers and acquisitions drive costs up • Licenses: archiving, preservation, interlibrary loan, reserves clauses
Librarianship • Move from curators to content creators • Degreed credentials vs. new skill sets • Retirements and cultural change • New standards: e.g., AACR2 revision • Declining leadership and services from Library of Congress • Mergers and Acquisitions: OCLC / RLIN; OCLC’s acquisition of digital rights management, ILL, reference software
Sources • The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition. Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2004. http://www.oclc.org/reports/escan/introduction/default.htm • 2010 Commission Reports. http://chancellor.uark.edu/101.htm • All Things Academic. http://libinfo.uark.edu/ata/ • Chronicle of Higher Education. Special Issues and Data. http://chronicle.com/special/ • MINES for Libraries(tm): Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services and the Ontario Council of University Libraries' Scholar Portal, Final Report, January 26, 2006. Washington, D.C. Association of Research Libraries, 2006. http://www.libqual.org/documents/admin/FINAL%20REPORT_Jan26mk.pdf • Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2005. http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm • University of Arkansas Office of Institutional Research. http://www.uark.edu/admin/uadata/index.html