1 / 6

Hybrid Projects

Hybrid Projects. VQEG Rennes, June 2012. Summary. Four proponents: DT, OPTICOM, SwissQual, Yonsei Models were submitted on June 6. Next steps Source selection Test design (full matrix, number of sources, number of HRCs, common sets) Encoder and decoders Transport protocol Schedule.

urit
Télécharger la présentation

Hybrid Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hybrid Projects VQEG Rennes, June 2012

  2. Summary • Four proponents: DT, OPTICOM, SwissQual, Yonsei • Models were submitted on June 6. • Next steps • Source selection • Test design (full matrix, number of sources, number of HRCs, common sets) • Encoder and decoders • Transport protocol • Schedule

  3. Source Selection • Review of sources including secret sources

  4. Test design • Number of tests • Proponents: DT (1), OPTICOM (1), SwissQual (1), Yonsei (3) • ILGS: • Test design • Number of sources • Number of HRCS • Common sets

  5. Schedule • Test design by ILGs and proponents: (Model submission + 2 month). • Test design review by ILGs and proponents: (Model submission + 3 month). • ILG will send exactly the number of SRCs required. (Model submission + 4 month) • ILG creates common sets and send them to ILG/Proponents. (Model submission + 4 month) • The relevant organizations generate the PVSs, using the scenes that were sent to them and send all the PVSs to a common point of contact who will distribute them to ILGs and proponents. (Model submission +5 month) • Proponents check calibration of all PVSs and identify potential problems. They may ask the ILG to review the selection of test material and replace if necessary. (Model submission + 6 month)

  6. Schedule • If a proponent or ILG testlab believes that any experiment is unbalanced in terms of qualities or have calibration problems, they may ask the ILG to review the selection of test material. If a majority of ILG agrees, then selection of PVSs will be amended. An even distribution of qualities from excellent to bad is desirable. (Model submission + 6 month) • ILGs and proponents run their subject test & submits results to the ILG. (Model submission + 8 month). • Proponents submit their objective data. (Model submission + 8 month) • Verification of submitted models by ILG (Model submission + 9 month) • ILG distribute subjective data and draft statistical analysis to the proponents and other ILG (Model submission + 9 month) • ILG distribute objective data to the proponents and other ILG (Model submission + 9 month) • Statistical analysis (Model submission + 10 month) • Draft final report (Model submission + 12 month)

More Related