html5-img
1 / 13

A Modeling Study to Determine the Effectiveness of an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV)

A Modeling Study to Determine the Effectiveness of an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV). R. Pastor 1 , E. Gutierrez-Miravete 2 and N. Lemcoff 2 1 General Dynamics Electric Boat 2 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Hartford. Background. Energy Recovery Ventilator

ursula
Télécharger la présentation

A Modeling Study to Determine the Effectiveness of an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Modeling Study to Determine the Effectiveness of an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV) R. Pastor1, E. Gutierrez-Miravete2 and N. Lemcoff2 1General Dynamics Electric Boat 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Hartford

  2. Background • Energy Recovery Ventilator • A heat exchanger used in HVAC applications that allows heat and mass transfer between two airstreams separated by a membrane • Utilizes conditioned air to: • Heat or cool outside air • Humidify or dehumidify outside air

  3. Objective • To numerically evaluate the effectiveness of an energy recovery ventilator during the summer and winter seasons with both countercurrent and concurrent flow

  4. Governing Equations - Multiphysics • Fluid Equation • Momentum transport • Continuity • Heat Transfer • Mass Transfer

  5. Sensible and Latent Effectiveness

  6. Finite Element Model Inputs • Outside Air Properties (Summer and Winter Seasons) • Building Air Properties (Summer and Winter Seasons)

  7. Finite Element Model (2D) • Mesh • ERV Basic Dimensions • Membrane Properties

  8. Results - ERV Effectiveness • Sensible and Latent Effectiveness with Equal Velocities in both Channels (Summer Conditions)

  9. Results – ERV Temperature Profiles • Across the channel at several axial locations (Summer Conditions) Outside Air Outside Air Building Air Building Air

  10. Results – Velocity & Concentration Fields • Midsection of the channel (Summer Conditions)

  11. Results – ERV Effectiveness • Sensible and Latent Effectiveness with Equal Velocities in both Channels (Winter Conditions)

  12. Results – Temperature Profiles • Across the channel at the axial midpoint (x = 0.125 m) and at a speed of 1.25 m/s (Winter Conditions)

  13. Conclusions • Countercurrent flow ERV is more effective than concurrent flow • The performance of a countercurrent flow ERV has the potential to improve as the size increases. • The effectiveness of the ERV increases as the flow through the channel decreases, and an optimum size/velocity can be determined • 3D modeling of the crossflow ERV must be explored

More Related