1 / 15

2013 NAECS-SDE Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA June 2013

Formative Assessment: So What Happens Next?. Kathy Hebbeler SRI International. 2013 NAECS-SDE Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA June 2013. What level of investment has your state made in promoting the implementation of formative assessment statewide in early childhood programs ?

valin
Télécharger la présentation

2013 NAECS-SDE Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA June 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Formative Assessment: So What Happens Next? Kathy Hebbeler SRI International 2013 NAECS-SDE Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA June 2013

  2. What level of investment has your state made in promoting the implementation of formative assessment statewide in early childhood programs? • Limited or short term investment • Some investment • Substantial investment

  3. Where are your early childhood teachers with regard to implementing formative assessment? • Not sure where they are • Few or some teachers across the state are implementing formative assessment • Substantial numbers of teachers are implementing formative assessment

  4. The purpose of formative (any) assessment is…. …to take some action.

  5. Validity • Is not a characteristic of a tool. • It is not accurate to say “assessment X is valid.” • Is a characteristic of the use that follows from the results. • The same tool can be valid for one use (decision) and not valid for another. • Users should continue to collect and examine the validity evidence for their uses.

  6. Myth busting • There are not different standards of validity for different purposes • “It is only being used by the teacher in the classroom.”

  7. Findings – Meaning – Action (FMA) • Findings • The score, the results, the report, the output • If the assessment is administered properly, not debatable. • Meaning • The interpretation one puts on the findings. • Reasonable people can differ but… • Action • The action to be undertaken based on the F and the M. • Reasonable people can differ but...

  8. Example • Finding: • Of the entering kindergarteners, • 20% can recognize all of the letters of the alphabet. • 25% can count from 1 to 10. • Meaning • Is this good news or bad news? • What determines whether you see it as good or bad news? • Action • Teacher? • Principal? • State Early Childhood Specialist?

  9. A = Achieved E = Emerging NY = Not Yet

  10. Teacher takes action…

  11. Building level administrator takes action…

  12. Regional/state level administrator takes action…

  13. Findings – What are they? • Meaning – • Good, bad, neutral? • What was expected? • Does it merit an action? • Action – • Change the course • Stay the course • Reward • Punishment/sanction • Ignore the finding

  14. Using findings from formative assessment • What are the kinds of decisions that will be made based on the findings? • Is there a body of evidence to support that the findings from this tool can be used to make these kind of decisions? • Does that body of evidence support the use of the tool with the populations with whom we are using it? • What evidence will we collect to substantiate that the tool is providing valid information for the decisions we are making based on the results?

  15. Take Away Messages • Formative assessments should be used for taking action. • Action centers around instructional practices. • Validity relates to the use of the findings, not to the tool itself. • The obligation rests with the users to: • Identify tools valid for their intended uses. • Continue to verify that the resulting information is valid for the decisions being made.

More Related