1 / 14

Boeing Flight Testing

Boeing Flight Testing. Kelly Kimberling Kelsey LaRoche Tyde Sirk Michael Ulmen. Team input & Conflicts. Only one person can work on the model at once Weekly time spent on project was over 18 people hours Email good source of communication. Problem Description.

vangie
Télécharger la présentation

Boeing Flight Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Boeing Flight Testing Kelly Kimberling Kelsey LaRoche Tyde Sirk Michael Ulmen

  2. Team input & Conflicts • Only one person can work on the model at once • Weekly time spent on project was over 18 people hours • Email good source of communication

  3. Problem Description • Estimating testing time with given resources is problematic • What is the probability of finishing the certification tests by a given date with given resources • What is the time between gates • This helps to find finish time after major delays

  4. Objective • Estimate two kinds of variability • Resource skill level • Failures/Delays/Visits from Murphy during testing

  5. Method • Discrete event simulation in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulation using the simulation software Arena • Based on business rules • Many iterations with variation in each test • Allows visualization of the process with animation • Able to see what resources are spending the most time at ????

  6. Assumptions • Three people per team • Skill levels and pay are known and vary • Testing is planned to the individual level • Adequate fleet size to do all testing and/or multiple tests to a plane in parallel • Order/schedule of tests • Chances and distributions • Skill Distribution: 90/100/110

  7. Parts of Model • We will have shortcuts to each major part of the model

  8. Flight vs. ground tests • Flight tests have a set time but can be delayed for weather and ground prep delays • Ground tests have variable times based on resource skills and availability and what was discovered during testing

  9. Resource teams • Tests are performed by teams but we allocate individual tasks • Each team has members with different skill levels • System pulls workers • Fastest to slowest • Selected on preferred order based on speed of worker and availability • Could be pulled by some attribute/variable such as cost relative to speed

  10. Failures • Major delays to the project • Redesigns • % chance that varies each time • Minor delays to the project • Weather delays • Over allocated resources • Resource shortage

  11. Outcomes • How long will it take, not as point estimate, but as confidence interval and probability • 25 Workers • Fastest worker’s total hours: • Medium speed worker’s total hours: • Slowest worker’s total hours: • Labor Costs • Duration of process • Utilization

  12. Delays • In-air flight testing is go/no-go • Weather delays can prevent a test • % chance to delay a flight test due to weather • Changes with each test and iteration • Test duration is constant • While plane is waiting for concurrent tasks to finish

  13. Gates • Milestones • Record date reached • Helps find major risk of delay

  14. Impact on Stakeholders • If model is used • Customers can get a more realistic time frame on when to expect their planes • Boeing has a better idea knowing how long flight testing will take and expected costs (95% confidence interval) • Boeing will know how many workers they will need to complete a process in a more effective manner • Can put more workers at other tasks to speed up process

More Related