1 / 67

Tasting Chile

Tasting Chile. Using Archetypal Metaphor to Map Cultural Landscape through Sampling Restaurants in 5 Chilean Cities. Cari Bourette American Association of Geographers Boston 2008. Cultural Geography.

vanna
Télécharger la présentation

Tasting Chile

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tasting Chile Using Archetypal Metaphor to Map Cultural Landscape through Sampling Restaurants in 5 Chilean Cities Cari Bourette American Association of Geographers Boston 2008

  2. Cultural Geography • The study of cultural identity, products and norms, with their variation across, and relations to, spaces and places. • Describing and analyzing the ways language, religion, economy, government, and other cultural phenomena vary or remain constant from one place to another. • Explaining how humans function spatially and how they distinguish themselves culturally from the “other” (Jordan, Domosh, and Rountree, eds. 1994).

  3. Scope of This Study • Qualitatively rate cultural products, and analyze their variation across 5 cities in Chile • Describe and analyze ways observed cultural phenomena vary or remain constant from each of these cities to another

  4. Overview • What is a Systems Approach? • Benefits of Quantifying Differences in attitudes/values/cultures • Restaurants as a Representative Place • Assessment Tool – The Compass Model • Comparing the 5 Cities “flavors” • Conclusion

  5. What is a Systems Approach? • Observing/evaluating an Integrated Whole • May study how all parts affect each other– that is the entire system • Not concerned with theoretical isolated parts or individual pieces

  6. Example in Physical Science • The actions of individual gas molecules on the surface of a balloon are for all practical purposes considered “random” • The relevant information is usually found by measuring the collective action of all of the molecules

  7. Systems Approach and Societies Example questions for societies: • How does a society respond to an event? • How does culture shape a society and how does the society reinforce its culture? • How do the values of one culture group compare with another?

  8. Limitations of Systems Approach with Societies The study of any group: • Tells us nothing of the beliefs, values, thoughts, or feelings of any individual within the group • Tells us nothing of the expected behavior of any individual within the group • Just like the gas molecules on the balloon, we are observing a system, and any conclusion regarding present or future behavior is a net effect of the whole.

  9. Example – Simple Observations • Assumed a generally safe, relaxing place even though individuals present are strangers. • Although all individuals not involved, a violent place and group.

  10. Benefits of Quantifying Group/Society Attitudes, Values, Culture • Clashes in culture groups or potential for escalation can be assessed and evaluated. • Qualitative observations of marginalization or other observed regional differences could be quantified and compared. • Level of socioeconomic stability or risk potential for destabilization could be assessed.

  11. The Compass Model Using Archetypal Metaphor for Assessing and Analyzing Systems

  12. Brief Background of “Compass” Model • Began as a conceptual model for describing events in general. • Further developed to describe and study qualitative, subjective data (primarily re: individuals and groups of people). • Categories are not precisely defined; they are understood through instruction and stories; they are metaphorical. • Modeled after simple, general, but “complete” world-views of pre-agricultural societies.

  13. Archetypal Categories • Primary categories are based on such archetypal values as “Earth, Air, Fire, Water.” • Additional categories are drawn from Jungian archetypal models such as “Anima” and “Animus” (later renamed to “Receptive” and “Directed”). • Eight compass points are used as abbreviations for these categories.

  14. Earth Receptive Somber Water Air Manic Directed Fire “Compass” of 4 Polarities N NE NW E W SE SW S

  15. Demonstrated Benefits • The Compass System has been successfully applied in the work of A New Story Foundation (a not for profit researching sustainability) for assessing and forecasting periods of • heightened social / economic instability • heightened likelihood of geopolitical escalation

  16. What about Place? • Places, being conceptual and subjective, are difficult to map. • Places, being unique, are difficult to compare with other places. • How can subjective, qualitative data about place be quantified so as to be meaningful and comparable with other places? • Could the “Compass” system be used to gather data on a subset of a place (e.g. a city’s restaurants)? How well would the results compare with general impressions of that place?

  17. Restaurants as Representative Place • 60% fail within the first year • Patrons “vote” for success by their continued business • A successful restaurant must appeal or resonate with its clientele in décor, service, price range, as well as type and quality of food • Therefore a restaurant can represent the collective values or culture of its service area

  18. Compass Model Categories Adapted for Social Spaces

  19. 4 Primary Categories Earth Water Air Fire

  20. Stillness, quiet, calm Solid, stable Cold, cool Wood, stone, trees Colors – “Earth tones” i.e. browns, rusts, etc. Loudness, busyness, activity Volatile, unstable Hot, warm Colors – “Fiery” reds, “loud” colors N – Earth vs. S – Fire

  21. Examples of “Earth”

  22. Examples of “Fire”

  23. Words, numbers, reason, logic Linear, well-defined Literally, of the air Dry, arid Colors – pastels, light colors Emotion, belief, intuition, imagination Ambiguous, fluid Literally, of the water Wet, humid Colors – blues, black, other dark colors (but not earth tones) E - Air vs. W - Water

  24. Examples of “Air”

  25. Examples of “Water”

  26. Receptive Somber Earth Air Water Fire Manic Directed 4 Hybrid Categories

  27. Welcoming, friendly, hospitable, nurturing Dainty, bite sized pieces Of relationships-- community, family, couple Colors – light pink, peach, combinations of Earth and Air colors (e.g. brown and yellow) Projective, lavish, abundant, extravagant Pertaining to the pursuit of instinctual enjoyment (food, drink, sex) Pertaining to “outdoors”-- hunting, warriors, etc. Colors – purple, combinations of Fire and Water colors (e.g. red and blue). NE - Receptive vs. SW - Directed

  28. Examples of “Receptive”

  29. Examples of “Directed”

  30. Chaotic, frenzied, messy, disordered Technology, fluorescent lights, trade, commerce Focused on future, endless possibilities Colors – orange, hot pink, neon green, combinations of Fire and Air colors, such as red and yellow. Strictly ordered; subdued, but eerie Dark, cold, wet places like caves Related to death, decay, the afterlife Focused on past, tradition Colors – grey, combinations of Earth and Water colors, such as blue-green. SE - Manic vs. NW - Somber

  31. Examples of “Manic”

  32. Examples of “Somber”

  33. Tasting Chile Study • 5 Urban areas studied over one month. • Area restaurants were visited and rated (0-100) on the relative strength of eight categories reflected in overall ambience, i.e. the “affect” or feeling of the restaurant. • Data collected was compared with other observations of the area to test the feasibility of using this as a study method.

  34. Example of Data Collected

  35. Santiago

  36. Santiago, cont’d

  37. Summary, Santiago Observations • Capital city, center of commerce and industry, good public transportation • Highly globalized – McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, KFC, international cuisine. • Still has town square with entertainment. • Marginalization – poor, “projectized” section of town less kept up.

  38. Comparison with Restaurant Data, Santiago • Santiago less calm and quiet (N) than Chile avg. • Santiago higher prevalence of communication with words and numbers, more intellectual (E). • Higher activity level/pace than Chile average (S).

  39. Comparison with Restaurant Data, Santiago • More trade, commerce, technology (SE) than Chile average. • More welcoming to outsiders (NE). • Less focused on the past, and tradition (NW).

  40. Santiago – Did it match? • How well did the collected restaurant data match what was otherwise observed regarding the city Santiago? Excellent Good Fair Poor X Not a lot of detail, but it matched very well.

  41. Temuco

  42. Temuco, cont’d

  43. Summary, Temuco Observations • Fair sized city (250,000 people) with shops and public transportation (collectivos). • Not as modernized as Santiago. • Cultural center for the Mapuche people. • Proud, but marginalized & oppressed people. • American Indian nation not conquered by the Spanish. • Characterized in the literature as “fierce”

  44. Comparison with Restaurant Data, Temuco • Temuco is similar to the average for the cities studied, but has a slightly slower pace (N). • Temuco showed a higher use of communication with imagery than with words (W vs. E).

  45. Comparison with Restaurant Data, Temuco • Higher emphasis on outdoors, cowboys, warriors, etc (SW) than avg. for cities studied. • Less welcoming of strangers than avg. (NE). • Less technologically oriented (SE). • Higher emphasis on the past or tradition (NW).

  46. Temuco – Did it match? • How well did the collected restaurant data match what was otherwise observed regarding the city Temuco? Excellent Good Fair Poor X Data matched general observations.

  47. Ancud, Chiloe

  48. Ancud, Chiloe

  49. Summary, Ancud Observations • Small island fishing town. • Some catering to tourists, but not aggressively sought out. • Suspicious of outsiders, especially land developers. • Cultural center for the Huilliche. • Conquered by the Spanish, very little left of a Huilliche people or culture.

More Related