1 / 15

Contracts

3. Contracts. Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Law, 13/e. © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 3. Contracts. Capacity to Contract Illegality Writing

varsha
Télécharger la présentation

Contracts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3 Contracts Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Law, 13/e © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

  2. 3 Contracts Capacity to Contract Illegality Writing Rights of Third Parties Performance & Remedies McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Law, 13/e © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

  3. Rights of Third Parties 17 C H E A P T R “The best minute I spend is the one I invest in people.” Kenneth Blanchard, The One Minute Manager (1993)

  4. Learning Objectives • Assignment of Contracts • Delegation of Duties • Third-Party Beneficiaries 17 - 5

  5. Overview • Sometimes a person who entered into a contract must transfer contract rights or duties to another person (third party) • Transfer of a right under a contract is called an assignment • Appointment of another person to perform a duty under a contract is called a delegation 17 - 6

  6. Limitations on Assignment • Assignment will not be effective if it: • Is contrary to public policy • Violates a non-assignment clause in a contract • See Managed Health Care Associates v. Kethan • Adversely affects obligor in significant way • Involved a personal relationship or element of personal skill or character 17 - 7

  7. Limitations on Delegation • Assignment extinguishes assignor’s right and transfers it to assignee, but delegation of a dutydoes not extinguish the duty owed by delegator to obligee • Delegator remains liable to the obligee unless obligee agrees to substitute new party for delegator by novation • In an effective delegation, performance by the delegatee will discharge the delegator 17 - 8

  8. Limitations on Delegation • Duties not delegable if delegation: • Is contrary to public policy • Violates non-assignment clause in contract • Adversely affects obligee in significant way • Involved a personal relationship or element of personal skill or character 17 - 9

  9. Third-Party Beneficiaries • If parties to a contract intended to benefit a third party, courts permit third party (third-party beneficiary) to enforce the contract • Referred to as third-party beneficiary • See Locke v. Ozark City Board of Ed. • Incidental beneficiaryis one obtaining a benefit as unintended by-product of a contract • No rights under contract 17 - 10

  10. Test Your Knowledge • True=A, False = B • A person who assigns a right is an obligee • All duties may be delegated • Non-assignment clauses are enforceable • If a contract contains a non-assignment clause, the clause actually means that duties may not be delegated 17 - 11

  11. Test Your Knowledge • True=A, False = B • Sheila assigned her right to the proceeds of a prize to a charity. Sheila is an assignee and the charity is the assignor. • Joshua contracted with Bigg Homes to build a two-story house that will improve the value of nearby homes. Joshua’s neighbor is an incidental beneficiary. 17 - 12

  12. Test Your Knowledge • Multiple Choice • James financed car purchase with CarCo, then sold the car to Marsha. Marsha agreed to pay remaining amount of the car loan, but failed to make payments. CarCo may sue: • (a) James only since he contracted with CarCo • (b) James and Marsha since CarCo is a creditor beneficiary of the contract between James and Marsha • (c) Marsha only since Marsha was substituted for James 17 - 13

  13. Test Your Knowledge • Multiple Choice • Mack contracted with Dept. Store to play piano and holiday songs in the store during December. Contract had a “non-assignment” clause. Mack got another job and delegated his duties to Sarah. Does Dept. Store have a claim against Mack? • (a) Yes. Mack breached the non-assignment clause by delegating his duties to Sarah • (b) No. Mack found someone to replace him • (c) No. Contract didn’t have non-delegation clause 17 - 14

  14. Thought Question • If public policy favors freedom of contract, then should courts enforce non-assignment and non-competition clauses? 17 - 15

More Related