1 / 9

Interaction between incentives for carbon abatement

Interaction between incentives for carbon abatement. The end of Emissions Trading? A.J. Mulder (arnold.mulder@rug.nl) . Introduction. EU ETS is key incentive to reach deep CO2 reduction in the industry in an cost-effective manner

vea
Télécharger la présentation

Interaction between incentives for carbon abatement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interaction between incentives for carbon abatement The end of Emissions Trading? A.J. Mulder (arnold.mulder@rug.nl)

  2. Introduction • EU ETS is key incentive to reach deep CO2 reduction in the industry in an cost-effective manner • Yet, many other ‘parallel incentives’ for carbon abatement are in place • Literature* suggests: merely a more costly substitute of the EU ETS and undermines the carbon price • A quantitative analysis of the full system is needed to better understand interactions with the EU ETS * e.g. Unger and Ahlgren, 2005; Smith and Sorrell, 2001; Sorrell and Sijm, 2004; Rathmann, 2007; De Jonghe et al., 2009; Hepburn, 2006; Morris et al., 2010

  3. Methodology • Stochastic Simulation Model of the EU ETS (Mulder and Jepma, 2013) • Check marginal effect on carbon price and emission level before and after expiration of parallel incentives  Distinguish between two types…

  4. Estimating the combined effect

  5. Methodology • We run multiple scenarios, each time assuming a greater annual impact of either type of parallel incentive: between 0 and 30 MtCO2/yr of abatement (0 - 1,6% per annum) • Simulation horizon is 2030 • Parallel incentives take effect between 2012-2025

  6. Results – Carbon Price • Carbon Price over time assuming 30 MtCO2/yr impact Type 1 Type 2

  7. Conclusion on carbon price • Type 2 incentives have greatest depreciating effect on the carbon price • Type 1 incentives do depreciate the carbon price, but rebound fairly quickly after these incentives have expired/phased-out. •  Low carbon prices could trigger policy-makers to introduce extra parallel incentives!!

  8. Results Complementarity of abatement Sensitivity to Economic Growth Average = 16%

  9. Conclusion on Emissions • Complementarity is generally low (~30%) but can be higher, although this would signal the silent death of emissions trading (if impact > 40 MtCO2/yr). • This treshold level could be lower if economic growth projections are grim • Current market conditions are alarming! (low prices, low economic growth) • Policy-makers could end up in deadly spiral and unwillingly pull the plug on emissions trading

More Related