1 / 21

Spectroscopic factors of the closed shell nuclei in the source term approach

Spectroscopic factors of the closed shell nuclei in the source term approach. N. K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey. Closed shell nuclei: all single-particle orbits are fully occupied. Spectroscopic factors of closed shell nuclei in the independent particle model (IPM):

veata
Télécharger la présentation

Spectroscopic factors of the closed shell nuclei in the source term approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spectroscopic factors of the closed shell nuclei in the source term approach N. K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey

  2. Closed shell nuclei: all single-particle orbits are fully occupied. Spectroscopic factors of closed shell nuclei in the independent particle model (IPM): For A|A-1: Slj = 2j+1 ( times (A/(A-1))2n+l, if centre of mass motion is excluded) For A|A+1: Slj = 1( times ((A+1)/A)2n+l, if centre of mass motion is excluded) Reminder: I(r) = A|A-1(= A-1/2 nlj(r)in the IPM) I(r) = (lm 1/2| j mj) (JA-1 MA-1 j mj | JA MA) Ilj(r) Ylm(ȓ)1/2 Slj is equal to the number of nucleons in the shell nlj A m mj MA-1

  3. SF of closed shell nuclei measured from (e,ep) reactions: (taken from compillation of Kramer et al NPA 679 (2001) 267) A A-1 lj SIPM Sexp Sexp/SIPM 4He 3H s1/2 2 0.7-0.8 16O 15N p1/2 2 1.27(13) 0.64(5) p3/2 4 2.25(22) 0.56(11) 40Ca 39K d3/2 4 2.58(19) 0.65(5) s1/2 2 1.03(7) 0.52(4) 48Ca 47K s1/2 2 1.07(7) 0.54(4) d3/2 4 2.26(16) 0.57(4) d5/2 6 0.683(49) 0.11(1) 208Pb 207Tl s1/2 2 0.98(9) 0.48(5) d3/2 4 2.31(22) 0.58(6) h11/2 12 6.85(68) 0.57(6) d5/2 6 2.93(28) 0.49(5) g7/2 8 2.06(20) 0.26(3)

  4. Reduction of spectroscopic strength from knockout reactions A. Gade et al, Phys. Rev. C 77, 044306 (2008)

  5. Contradiction: Knockout experiments seem to indicate that single-particle orbits in closed shell nuclei are only half filled!!!  They are not closed shell nuclei!!! Systematics of binding energies and other observables indicates that closed-shell nuclei exist. A possible way to resolve this contradictions is Source Term Approach (STA)

  6. Two ways of calculation of Ilj(r) for B = A-1: • Traditional way, direct evaluation (direct overlap (DO)) • 2) To solve the inhomogeneous equation (IE) source term

  7. Source term approach: • Model wave functions A and B are taken from the 0ħ oscillator shell model, • (which for closed shell model are the same as in the IPM) • Interaction V: For the two-body NN potential the M3YE potential is used from Bertsch et al, Nucl. Phys. A 284 (1977) 399 VST= V1,STexp(–a1,STr)/r +V2,STexp(–a2,STr)/r+V3,STexp(–a3,STr)/r + spin-orbit+tensor… Coefficients Vi,STand ai,SThave been found by fitting the matrix elements derived in Brighton from NN elastic scattering data

  8. A = 2 Veff(r) SF M3YE 0.91 Realistic SF: 0.94 for AV18

  9. SIPM SSTA Sab-initio 3H 1.5 1.21 1.30 4He 2.0 1.29 1.50

  10. SSTA = 1.52 experiment: Shell model Reduction factor (e,e’p) 1.27 ± 0.13 0ħ (non TI) 2.0 0.64 ± 0.07 p knockout 1.12 ± 0.07 0ħ (TI) 2.13 (p,d) 1.48 ± 0.16 4ħ (non TI) 1.65

  11. A A-1 SSM SSTA 7Li 6He 0.69 0.28 7Li 6Li 0.87 0.44 8Li 7He 1.02 0.38 8Li 7Li 1.14 0.66 8B 7Be 1.14 0.78 9Li 8Li 1.04 0.60 9Be 8Li 1.13 0.45 9C 8B 1.04 0.71 10Be 9Li 1.93 0.81 10Be 9Be 2.67 1.48 12B 11B 0.99 0.97 12C 11B 2.85 1.55 13C 12C 0.63 0.63 14C 13C 1.87 1.82 14N 13N 0.72 0.60 15N 14N 1.48 1.31 16O 15N 2.13 1.52 Sexp experiment 0.42(4) (e,e’p) 0.74(11) (d,t) 0.36(7) (d,3He) 0.89(7) p knockout 0.59(15) (d,t) 0.77(6) p knockout 0.40(6) (d,p) 1.72(11) (e,e’p) 0.54(8) (d,p) 1.07(22) (d,p) 0.48(8) (p,d) 0.93(15) (d,p) 1.27(13) (e,e’p) SVMC 0.42 0.68 0.58 0.97 0.97 1.14 0.73 1.14 1.04 1.93

  12. SF of double-closed shell nuclei obtained from STA calculations: Oscillator IPM wave functions are used with ħ = 41A-1/3 - 25A-2/3 and the M3YE NN potential A A-1 lj SIPM Sexp SSTA 4He 3H s1/2 2.0 1.4-1.6 1.29 16O 15N p1/2 2.0 1.27(13) 1.52 p3/2 4.0 2.25(22) 2.60 40Ca 39K d3/2 4.0 2.58(19) 3.01 s1/2 2.0 1.03(7) 1.15 48Ca 47K s1/2 2.0 1.07(7) 1.20 d3/2 4.0 2.26(16) 2.35 d5/2 6.0 0.683(49) 3.61 208Pb 207Tl s1/2 2.0 0.98(9) 0.92 d3/2 4.0 2.31(22) 1.76 d5/2 6.0 2.93(28) 2.71 Preliminary

  13. Shell closure away from beta-stability New magic nucleus: 24O (C.R.Hoffman et al,Phys.Lett. B 672, 17 (2009)) Neutrons occupy shells: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2 Protons occupy shells: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2 One-Neutron Removal Measurement 12C(24O, 23O), E=920 MeV/A (R.Kanungo et al, Phys.Rev.Lett. 102, 152501 (2009)) Sexp = 1.74  0.19 for s1/2 removal SIPM = 2.0 (or S = 2.18 with centre-of mass removal) SSM(SDPF-M) = 1.769; SSM(USDB) = 1.810 Source term approach with oscillator IPM wave functions for 24O and 23O gives SSTA = 1.64 Preliminary

  14. Double magic N=Z nucleus: 56Ni Fully occupied shells: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d 3/2,0f7/2 57Ni has one valence neutron above double closed shell core 56Ni One-Neutron Removal Measurement 9Be(57Ni,56Ni+γ )X (K. L. Yurkewicz et al, Phys.Rev. C 74, 024304 (2006)) SIPM = 1.0 Sexp = 0.58  0.11 for p1/2 removal Source term approach with oscillator IPM wave functions for 57Ni and 56Ni gives SSTA = 0.62 Preliminary

  15. Double magic 60Ca? Fully occupied shells: Protons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d 3/2 Neutrons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2, 0f7/2, 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2 Preliminary

  16. Double magic 78Ni? Fully occupied shells: Protons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d 3/2,0f7/2 Neutrons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2, 0f7/2, 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2, 0g 9/2 Preliminary

  17. Double magic 100Sn Fully occupied shells: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2, 0f7/2, 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2, 0g 9/2 Proton knockout Neutron knockout Preliminary

  18. Double magic 132Sn Fully occupied shells: Neutrons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2,0f7/2, 1p3/2,0f5/2,1p1/2, 0g9/2,0g7/2,1d5/2,1d3/2,2s1/2 ,0h11/2 Protons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2, 0f7/2, 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2, 0g 9/2 Preliminary Final nucleus J Ex(MeV) SSTA/SIPM 131Sn 3/2+ g.s. 0.83 1/2+ 0.332 0.83 5/2+ 1.655 0.82

  19. Conclusions: STA can reconcile reduction of spectroscopic strength in double closed shell nuclei with double magic nature of these nuclei. STA employs IPM wave function but gets reduced spectroscopic factors if NN interaction is chosen correctly. Implications for the meaning of spectroscopic factors: SFs are the measure of strength of the interaction of the removed nucleon rather than the measure of the shell occupancies. Publications: N.K. Timofeyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 242501 (2009) N.K. Timofeyuk, Phys. Rev. C 81, 064306 (2010)

  20. Double magic 132Sn Fully occupied shells: Neutrons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2,0f7/2, 1p3/2,0f5/2,1p1/2, 0g9/2,0g7/2,1d5/2,1d3/2,2s1/2 ,0h11/2 Protons: 0s1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0d5/2, 1s1/2, 0d3/2, 0f7/2, 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2, 0g 9/2 Preliminary Final nucleus J Ex (MeV) SSTA/SIPM 131Sn 3/2+ g.s. 0.83 1/2+ 0.332 0.83 5/2+ 1.655 0.82 131In 9/2+ g.s. 1/20.302 3/2 1.290

More Related