1 / 5

Regional Technical Forum QC Contractor Review

Regional Technical Forum QC Contractor Review. November 22, 2013 RTF PAC Presentation. QC Contract work for 2013. As a reminder, all RTF Staff developed work products are sent to 3 rd party QC reviewer EnerNOC won competitively bid RFP to do this work for 2013

venice
Télécharger la présentation

Regional Technical Forum QC Contractor Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regional Technical ForumQC Contractor Review November 22, 2013 RTF PAC Presentation

  2. QC Contract work for 2013 • As a reminder, all RTF Staff developed work products are sent to 3rd party QC reviewer • EnerNOC won competitively bid RFP to do this work for 2013 • Set up QC checklist for work product review • Had mid-year check-in on process and noted several improvements • Informed of possibility of re-bidding work

  3. Why bring this before the PAC? • RTF generally abides by council contract policy • Council policy states contracts over $25,000 need to be competitively bid • EnerNOC contract is T&M, not-to-exceed $100,000 • Historically contracts have only spanned 1 year • Funding only guaranteed for single year • Staff would like to extend existing contract with EnerNOC instead of rebidding • Council ok with this as long as PAC agrees • Already cleared with RTF staff and Ops Subcommittee • RTF plans to re-bid QC contract for 2015

  4. Staff Recommendation • Would like to continue to use EnerNOC for 2014 QC reviews • Very thorough reviews thus far • Decreased review time in work products, despite increase in complexity (ex. LED workbook) • Investment in time to bring their staff up to speed has made reviews more productive • Better $/work product value • Nearing end of legacy measure review • Intend to review areas to improve focus on • Ex. Savings methodology tracking what the RTF approved

  5. Support Documents • Sole Source Justification Memo • Example Measure Review • LED Review Memo • LED Discussions w/ Staff (Rounds 1 & 2)

More Related