1 / 173

Last Time

Last Time. Hypothesis Testing Yes – No Questions Assess with p-value P[what saw or m.c. | Boundary] Interpretation Small is conclusive 1-sided vs. 2-sided. Administrative Matters. Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24. Administrative Matters. Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24

vera
Télécharger la présentation

Last Time

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Last Time • Hypothesis Testing • Yes – No Questions • Assess with p-value P[what saw or m.c. | Boundary] • Interpretation • Small is conclusive • 1-sided vs. 2-sided

  2. Administrative Matters Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24

  3. Administrative Matters Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24 • Numerical answers: • No computers, no calculators • Handwrite Excel formulas (e.g. =9+4^2) • Don’t do arithmetic (e.g. use such formulas)

  4. Administrative Matters Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24 • Numerical answers: • No computers, no calculators • Handwrite Excel formulas (e.g. =9+4^2) • Don’t do arithmetic (e.g. use such formulas) • Bring with you: • 8.5 x 11 inch sheet of paper • With your favorite info (formulas, Excel, etc.)

  5. Administrative Matters Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24 • Numerical answers: • No computers, no calculators • Handwrite Excel formulas (e.g. =9+4^2) • Don’t do arithmetic (e.g. use such formulas) • Bring with you: • 8.5 x 11 inch sheet of paper • With your favorite info (formulas, Excel, etc.) • Course in Concepts, not Memorization

  6. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Generally happy with result

  7. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Generally happy with result • But think carefully about “where to post” • Look at current Thread HW 4 • Note “diffusion of questions” • Hard to find what you want

  8. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Generally happy with result • But think carefully about “where to post” • Look at current Thread HW 4 • Note “diffusion of questions” • Hard to find what you want • Suggest keep HW problems all together • i.e. One “Root node” per HW problem

  9. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Suggest keep HW problems all together • i.e. One “Root node” per HW problem

  10. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Suggest keep HW problems all together • i.e. One “Root node” per HW problem • Choose where to post (in tree) carefully

  11. Administrative Matters State of BlackBoard Discussion Board • Suggest keep HW problems all together • i.e. One “Root node” per HW problem • Choose where to post (in tree) carefully • Use better “Subject Lines” • Not just dumb “Replies” • You can enter anything you want • Try to make it clear to readers… • Especially when “not following current line”

  12. Reading In Textbook Approximate Reading for Today’s Material: Pages 261-262, 9-14 Approximate Reading for Next Class: 270-276, 30-34

  13. Hypothesis Testing In General: p-value = P[what was seen, or more conclusive | at boundary between H0 & H1] Caution: more conclusive requires careful interpretation

  14. Hypothesis Testing Caution: more conclusive requires careful interpretation Reason: Need to decide between 1 - sided Hypotheses, like H0 : p < vs. H1: p ≥ And 2 - sided Hypotheses, like H0 : p = vs. H1: p ≠

  15. Hypothesis Testing e.g. a slot machine bears a sign which says “Win 30% of the time” In 10 plays, I don’t win any. Can I conclude sign is false? (& thus have grounds for complaint, or is this a reasonable occurrence?)

  16. Hypothesis Testing e.g. a slot machine bears a sign which says “Win 30% of the time” In 10 plays, I don’t win any. Conclude false? Let p = P[win], let X = # wins in 10 plays Model: X ~ Bi(10, p) Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3

  17. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3]

  18. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] (understand this by visualizing # line)

  19. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

  20. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 30% of 10, most likely when p = 0.3 i.e. least conclusive

  21. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 so more conclusive includes

  22. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 so more conclusive includes but since 2-sided, also include

  23. Hypothesis Testing Generally how to calculate? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

  24. Hypothesis Testing Generally how to calculate? Observed Value 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

  25. Hypothesis Testing Generally how to calculate? Observed Value Most Likely Value 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

  26. Hypothesis Testing Generally how to calculate? Observed Value Most Likely Value 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 # spaces = 3

  27. Hypothesis Testing Generally how to calculate? Observed Value Most Likely Value 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 # spaces = 3 so go 3 spaces in other direct’n

  28. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

  29. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3]

  30. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 | p = 0.3]

  31. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0] + (1 – P[X ≤ 5])

  32. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0] + (1 – P[X ≤ 5]) = 0.076

  33. Hypothesis Testing Result: More conclusive means X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 p-value = P[X = 0 or more conclusive | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0 or X ≥ 6 | p = 0.3] = P[X ≤ 0] + (1 – P[X ≤ 5]) = 0.076 Excel result from: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg4.xls

  34. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = 0.076

  35. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = 0.076 Yes-No Conclusion: 0.076 > 0.05, so not safe to conclude “P[win] = 0.3” sign is wrong, at level 0.05

  36. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = 0.076 Yes-No Conclusion: 0.076 > 0.05, so not safe to conclude “P[win] = 0.3” sign is wrong, at level 0.05 (10 straight losses is reasonably likely)

  37. Hypothesis Testing Test: H0: p = 0.3 vs. H1: p ≠ 0.3 p-value = 0.076 Yes-No Conclusion: 0.076 > 0.05, so not safe to conclude “P[win] = 0.3” sign is wrong, at level 0.05 Gray Level Conclusion: in “fuzzy zone”, some evidence, but not too strong

  38. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ???

  39. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? • Seems like same question?

  40. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? • Seems like same question? • Careful, “≠” became “<”

  41. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? • Seems like same question? • Careful, “≠” became “<” • I.e. 2-sided hypo became 1-sided hypo

  42. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? • Seems like same question? • Careful, “≠” became “<” • I.e. 2-sided hypo became 1-sided hypo • Difference can have major impact

  43. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ???

  44. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3

  45. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3]

  46. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3] same boundary between H0 & H1

  47. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3]

  48. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3] = P[ X ≤ 0 | p = 0.3]

  49. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3] = P[ X ≤ 0 | p = 0.3] = 0.028

  50. Hypothesis Testing Alternate Question: Same setup, can we conclude: P[win] < 30% ??? Test: H0: p ≥ 0.3 vs. H1: p < 0.3 p-value = P[ X = 0 or m. c. | p = 0.3] = P[ X ≤ 0 | p = 0.3] = 0.028 Excel result from: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg4.xls

More Related