1 / 8

DTI vibration artifact

DTI vibration artifact. FA map: No correction. FA map same subject, no artifact. DTI vibration artifact: No correction. Fstat of the tensor model. Tensor residuals associated with (1, 0, 0). DTI vibration artifact. FA map. Fstat map.

vicki
Télécharger la présentation

DTI vibration artifact

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DTI vibration artifact FA map: No correction FA map same subject, no artifact

  2. DTI vibration artifact: No correction Fstat of the tensor model Tensor residuals associated with (1, 0, 0)

  3. DTI vibration artifact FA map Fstat map Fitting the using all of the data, but including a noise term in the model (Rician noise)

  4. DTI vibration artifact FA map Fstat map Fitting the tensor by throwing out the data associated with the artifact (bxx>0.6) In this subject, this was 23 out of 64 directions

  5. DTI vibration artifact Ratio of actual data:predicted data within the artifact region In the manuscript, the authors used a = 0.61 and b=0.54 (shown in red)

  6. DTI vibration artifact FA map Fitting the using all of the data, but including a regressor in the model using the method described in the manuscript

  7. Comparisons against same subject scanned without the artifact: differences in FA Removing data No correction Rician noise FSL regressor Mean absolute value difference in FA in a mask of the artifact: NC: 0.236 > Noise: 0.181 > Regressor: 0.167 > Remove: 0.086

  8. Comparisons against same subject scanned without the artifact: difference in the direction of primary eigenvector Removing data No correction Rician noise FSL regressor Mean difference in angle of primary eigenvector (degrees) in a mask of the artifact NC: 57.6 > Noise: 57.4 > Regressor: 55.7 > Remove: 47.5

More Related