1 / 11

Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension

Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension. Jonathan Hoffman Advisor: Professor Bucinell. http://www.globalwest.net/. Background. ‘Muscle’ car era- 1960’s to early 1970’s Produced heavy cars with significant power Other car characteristics were overlooked.

vienna
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension Jonathan Hoffman Advisor: Professor Bucinell http://www.globalwest.net/

  2. Background • ‘Muscle’ car era- 1960’s to early 1970’s • Produced heavy cars with significant power • Other car characteristics were overlooked http://www.matchboxcars.com/

  3. 1969 Chevrolet Camaro • Legendary champion in SCCA Trans-Am Series • Won 10 of 12 1968 races and championship • Won 6 of 12 1969 races and championship http://www.superchevy.com/ http://www.penske.com/

  4. Project Objective • Bring the suspension system up to modern standards • 35 years of technology • Enhanced Suspension • Improved handling capabilities • Without sacrificing ride quality http://www.chrysler.com/

  5. Sources of improvement • Poor A-arm geometry • Excessive positive camber gain • Small front sway bar • Minimal roll resistance • Tall springs • High center of gravity • Antiquated shocks • Poor ride quality http://www.globalwest.net/

  6. Suspension Alternatives • MacPherson strut • Pros: Inexpensive, compact • Cons: High mounting height required, moderate handling • Double A-arm (Wishbone) • Pros: Rigid, greatest handling performance • Cons: Costly, space engaging http://www.autozine.com/

  7. Excessive Positive Camber Gain • Outside tire loses contact with ground during cornering • Caused by poor A-arm geometry http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/

  8. Decision Matrix

  9. Suspension Modeling Software • WinGeo3 • Effects of changes in camber, toe, scrub, roll center, etc. http://www.mitchellsoftware.com/

  10. Remaining Tasks • Analyze alternatives with software • Define final design • Manufacture final design • Before / after performance testing http://www.hotrod.com

  11. Questions / Acknowledgements ? • Professor Bucinell • William C. Mitchell

More Related