SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics, Manila, October 2011

vinnie avatar
vinnie
11 diapositives · 286 Views · Sep 14, 2014

MDGs and Donor Behaviour. Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics, Manila, October 2011. What would we expect if MDGs had made a difference?. Overall increase in aid Shifts towards social sectors (especially health) Adoption of MDGs as targets

#simon scott, oecd international conference on mdg statistics, manila, october 2011 #simon scott, oecd international conference on mdg statistics, manila, october 2011 ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics, Manila, October 2011 - slide 1
01 / 11Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics, Manila, October 2011
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics, Manila, October 2011
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. MDGs and Donor Behaviour Simon Scott, OECD International Conference on MDG Statistics,Manila, October 2011

  2. What would we expect if MDGs had made a difference? • Overall increase in aid • Shifts towards social sectors(especially health) • Adoption of MDGs as targets • Demand for MDG-related indicators

  3. Note: Total ODA excludes exceptional debt relief to Iraq and Nigeria in 2005-06.

  4. Shift towards social sectors

  5. Adoption of MDGs as targets and demand for MDG indicators • UK, Netherlands and Denmark produce MDG reports (heyday early 2000s) • DAC tried a "sector approach" to measuringaid to MDGs (2002-3) • Slower growth of interest in USA, Japan, Australia  • Demand for indicators: IAEG, MDG reports, Global Monitoring Report etc.

  6. MDG 1: A special case • Halve the share of very poor people in developing countries • Not from a UN conference • More "growth focused" than other MDGs, though still social

  7. MDG 1 results • Will be achieved, unlike other MDGs • Mostly not thanks to aid • Food security element neglected until 2008 food security crisis and 2009 L'Aquila G8

  8. The “sectoral” MDGs - key donor responses • MDG2 - budget support to allow abolition ofschool fees • MDG3 - gender mainstreaming reversed - Danish torch campaign, Dutch MDG3 Fund • MDG4 - GAVI and rise of MNCH - Canada most recently in lead • MDG5 - Muffled reaction: MMR reduction target unrealistic; data controversies

  9. The “cross-cutting” MDGs • MDG6 - Health spending skewed to AIDS; use of vertical funds (GFATM, PEPFAR); progress on malaria hobbled by DDT controversy; tuberculosis only now taking off • MDG7 - Environment spending skewed to climate change, with niche funding of other issues - e.g. Switzerland on forestry, New Zealand on fisheries.  Water management still broadly supported.

  10. Conclusions • MDGs have been a major mobilising force for aid donors • Overall, MDGs a positive influence, though lobbying and special interests still present • Can't judge MDGs' impact only from 2000: UN conferences in 1990s set agenda

  11. Thank you For more informationwww.oecd.org/dac