1 / 34

The Resistive Plate Chamber system for the CMS experiment

The Resistive Plate Chamber system for the CMS experiment. M. Abbrescia on behalf of the CMS/RPC group. IEEE/NSS 2005. Outline of the talk. Historical introduction The system: goals and design Construction and Quality Control Installation and Commissioning Dedicated R&D and open issues

vinny
Télécharger la présentation

The Resistive Plate Chamber system for the CMS experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Resistive Plate Chamber system for the CMS experiment M. Abbrescia on behalf of the CMS/RPC group IEEE/NSS 2005

  2. Outline of the talk • Historical introduction • The system: goals and design • Construction and Quality Control • Installation and Commissioning • Dedicated R&D and open issues • Conclusions M. Abbrescia Bari University and INFN IEEE/NSS 2005

  3. The long road to CMS/RPC • The CMS/RPC project was originated by a small group of physicists from Bari (Italy) • During a meeting in Salzburg in 1992, interest was expressed to join CMS and to take part to the dedicated trigger system (Warsaw, Helsinki) • An intense R&D was needed to adapt the characteristics of RPCs to the hostile environment foreseen in CMS (1993-2005…). Colleagues from Pavia joined the effort. M. Abbrescia Bari University and INFN IEEE/NSS 2005

  4. The long road to CMS/RPC (2) • During 1994-1995 some korean, chinese and, later, pakistan universities expressed interest in this project →Endcap • These groups had little experience in detector physics, but RPCs were considered an item easy to approach and suitable to develop local expertise in gaseous detectors → technology transfer • Also Sofia University, INRNE (Bulgaria) and, recently, Naples have joined the collaboration and are actively involved in the project • The CMS CERN group is now contributing to the assembly and test of forward chambers

  5. Barrel: Bari, Napoli, Pavia, Sofia University, Sofia INRNE, Peking University Forward: Seoul (KODEL), Peking University, PAEC&Islamabad University , CERN, ITALY Trigger: Helsinki, Warsaw The collaboration … now

  6. The detector • Main characteristics of the RPCs used in CMS: • Bakelite thickness: 2 mm • Bakelite bulk resistivity : 2-3 1010cm • Gap width: 2 mm • Operating voltage: 9-10 kV Gas mixture 95.5 Freon 3.5 Isob 0.3 SF6 + RH 50% Number of gaps: 2 Other experiments have decided to use different configurations: single gap in ATLAS, streamer mode and multi-gap in ALICE

  7. …A not easy task • CMS will be based on • “A very good redundant muon system” • (Technical Proposal, • CERN-LHCC 94-28, 15 Dec. 1999) • The first level muon trigger should guarantee: • Complete coverage of the solid angle • Robustness: maximal use of available information • Speed: decision time of the order of 1 ms • (Letter of intent • CERN-LHCC 92-3 1 Oct. 1992) CMS muon trigger 2 complementary and independent systems RPC : fast dedicated trigger detectors DT + CSC: wire chambers for precise muon pT measurement For the CMS muon system see the talk by A. Sharma

  8. The requirements … • Physics requirements for the RPC system • muon identification • bunch crossing assignment (25 ns spaced b. x.) • cut on the muon pt Chamber Requirements Efficiency > 95 % Time resolution < 3 ns Cluster size < 2 strips Operational plateau > 300 V • CMS environmental conditions: • very good timing: 25 ns b.x. • long term operation: >10 years • neutron and gamma irradiation (up to 1 Gy) • expected maximum rate: ~100 Hz/cm2

  9. RPCs in the CMS experiment • Barrel, a few numbers: • 5 Wheels • 12 sectors per wheel • 6 RPC station/sector • 8/7 chamber per sector • Total: 480 chambers • 2500 m2 surface • 50.000 electr. Chann. RPCs RPCs are used as muon trigger both in barrel and endcap

  10. Design of the chambers Chamber dimension 120 RB1: 2 m 120 RB2: 2.5 m 120 RB3: 1.5 m 120 RB4: (1.5  2.5) m 2.5 m Chamber rectangular in the barrel Chambers trapezoidal in the endcaps, made of 3 independent Single Gap (SG)

  11. RPC Barrel production & test sites GT Single gap Double gap Pavia ISR (CERN) Sofia Bari GT HT ChamberassemblingSites Chambertest Sites 120 RB1 at HT & GT 240 RB2 and RB4 at GT 120 RB3 in Sofia (& Bari) RB1 in Pavia RB2 & RB4 in Bari RB3 in Sofia (& Bari)

  12. Flow of components (endcap) RPC trigger RE 1 assy & test Install & commission Bakelite Electronics Etc… Procurement Strips,panels etc RE 2 and 3 assy & test Gas gaps Assy & test … a round trip of 20 thousand km

  13. Quality Control and Quality Assurance Quality Control – Define Specifications Quality Assurance – Meet Specifications … A learning process

  14. Quality Control of Single Gaps (GT) SG assembled by GT Gas leakage test Control the gap “bubbles” in 30 s Overpressure test Reach an inside overpressure of 20 mbar: check if spacers or frame detach GT connects the HV wire ... The SG type (Right/Left) is assigned Bring the SG at 9500V and measure the current: reject if I > 5 A

  15. Overview of SG rejections % # SG 2003 2005 2004 2002 % Accepted/to install = 87 % Note: here and in the following, some spares are accounted for # SG 2004 2005 2002 2003

  16. Quality Control for Double Gaps 2 SG validated by previous step SG coupling Gas leakage test DG assembled by GT Check the gap “bubbles” in 30 s Bring the DG at 9500V and measure the current: reject if I > 5 A per single gap

  17. Oververview of DG rejections So far 77 % of the needed DGs have been accepted % # DG # DG 2003 2004 2005

  18. Quality Control for Chambers Production sites (HT-GT-SOFIA): quality control Test sites (Bari-Pavia-Sofia): study of chamber performance with cosmic rays ISR: long term current stability

  19. Prod. Overview (barrel) Single Gaps: 2395 fully tested  87 % of needed have been accepted. End of production: December 05. Double Gaps: 922 fully tested77 % of needed have been accepted. End of production: February 06. Chambers 401 have been assembled  75 % of total production

  20. Ovw. of Endcap CH production

  21. Cosmics telescopes at test sites Sofia Pavia Bari ISR (Endcap)

  22. Chamber efficiency Distribution of max. efficiency HV distribution at 95 % of max efficiency Efficiency in single/double gap

  23. Noise, current and cluster size Counting Rate (High rates are due to a single noisy channel) Current distribution Cluster size

  24. Commissioning at ISR • Final dressing • Final cooling, HV connectors, temperature sensors • Detector control • Up to 30 chambers can be tested at same time • Gas leak • Threshold setting and reading • Current vs. HV • Long stability test (15-20 days @ 9200 V) • Gas input overpressure test (since march) • Performance • 15 chambers can be tested at same time • Single rate (hits count.) vs. HV • Noise rate (cluster count.) vs. HV • Cluster size vs. HV • Efficiency with cosmic rays for suspicious chambers Chambers from Bari, Pavia, Sofia  CERN

  25. Monitoring of CH performance

  26. Coupling with DTs 1st step 2nd step 3rd step 3 compensating planes needed for each RPC-DT-RPC system (MB1-MB2-MB4 stations)

  27. Installation at SX5 After the transport at SX5 the RPC functionality test (gas leak, HV integrity, threshold setting/reading/ strips connectivity ) are repeated to find any damage or deterioration during transportation • On the installed chambers we check gas leaks, LV integrity.

  28. Overview of chamber installation • The functionality tests (gas leak, HV integrity, threshold setting/reading/ strips connectivity) are repeated: • at ISR once the RPC is coupled with DT • at SX5 before installation • after installation 2 Wheels installed  156 chamber

  29. e- ;  ; UV ; etc. avalanche R&D issues Analisys done with F- specific eletrode and High Pressure Liquid Cromatography (HPLC) Unreacted molecules + + + HF + radiolytic products R134a C4H10 SF6

  30. ~ 2 mm R&D issues It seems that a large fraction of F- produced doesn’t exit the chambers. It reacts on the detector internal surface? An accurate analysis of the internal bakelite is needed. … Recently we have analysed few samples with a SEMEDS/X-ray.

  31. silicon hose used spring new spring Results from R&D tests They have given many important hints on the correct material choice, with a view to 10 CMS years operation Low gas flux T-connector with HF “corrosion” on the internal surface …solved by the use of polycarbonate.

  32. Nevertheless … the final performance Cluster size Efficiency … after the ageing test (~ 10 equivalent years) Counting rate All parameters are compatible with the results obtained during the production test

  33. Conclusions • The RPC system for CMS is one of the largest, most complex and elaborated apparatus ever built, based on RPCs • It will have a crucial role in providing a first level muon trigger during at least 10 years of data taking • An incredible effort for R&D on different issues: gas, rate capability, aging, etc, has been needed

  34. Conclusions … 2 • The costruction of such an apparatus lies well beyond the scale of old experiments … it is more like an industrial scale effort • Its construction is almost completed, and the commissioning phase has just started • QA and QC show that the needed requirements are fully satisfied … and now let us what happens

More Related