1 / 26

I. The European Commission Impact Assessment ( EC-IA)

EC-IA as EPI instrument ? The Integrated Impact Assessment procedure of the EC as environment integration tool within European actions and decisions ?. I. The European Commission Impact Assessment ( EC-IA). The research object : EC-IA. IA: ex ante evaluation of impact at policy level

vlad
Télécharger la présentation

I. The European Commission Impact Assessment ( EC-IA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EC-IA as EPI instrument ?The Integrated Impact Assessmentprocedure of the EC as environmentintegrationtoolwithinEuropean actions and decisions?

  2. I. The European Commission Impact Assessment (EC-IA)

  3. The researchobject: EC-IA • IA: ex ante evaluation of impact at policy level • Many (+/-) sectorial IA systems: RIA, EIA, SEA, HIA, Soc. IA, … •  Dvlpmt: S(I)A and IIA • 2002: integrated impact assessment system • Very ambitious system  interest/« hopes »

  4. The EC objectives • “The objectives of the new impact assessment process are • to improve the quality of Commission proposals, • to ensure an analysis of the economic, environmental and social impacts of a proposal and • to improve and simplify the regulatory environment.” (EC, 2002, p.6 – Guidelines)

  5. Two/three genealogical lines: Since 2002: EC-IA (First implementation in 2003, revised in 2005 and 2009) • Better Regulation agenda • (1986: BIA) • 2001: White paper on European Governance • 2002: Better regulation act •  focus on (R)IA • SD agenda • 1997: Envi in the EC treaty • 1998: Cardiff process • 2001: European SD strategy  dev. of SIA • Lisbon Strategy • 2005: mid-term evaluation  focus on growth and jobs

  6. Procedure details • Analysis of what? • Since 2009: CLWP+… • Multiple options • Scope of the analysis: • Proportionalityprinciple: depthproportional to potential impacts • Some important aspects: • DG lead in charge of IA • Inter service working group coordination • Impact AssessmentBoard  « external » control

  7. Whatis the « place » and « weight » of « environmentalconsiderations » within the EC-IA: state of the art II. EC-IA and EPILiteraturereview: phase I

  8. Meta-evaluations Table 1 : EC-IA meta-evaluations

  9. 2002-2005 : Exploratory studies and first evaluations based on initial guidelines • Negative meta-evaluations but latent optimism : • Undefined policy objectives • Lack of coherence • Few (real) options studied  justification • Problem of information diffusion • « Unbalance » between the 3 pilars

  10. 2005-2008 : Meta-evaluations following the first guidelines revision • Environmental expertise? • Bias towards regular experts of the DG’s • Lack of representativity of the consultations • Bias NGO’s (vs industrial and business lobby’s) • No environmental stakeholders in 2/3 of IA • Unbalance btw the pilars w/r to impact identification • Getting worse after 2005 guidelines

  11. (TEP, 2007, p.82)

  12. (ECA, 2010, p.37)

  13. Quantification/ monetisation (ECA, 2010, p.38)

  14. III. Literaturereview: phase II

  15. Phase 1 = technical, evidence-basedapproach • EC-IA as « knowledgetool » (Bäckund, 2009), as rationalisingdecision-support tool(Popelier et Verlinden 2009) • Phase 2 = EC-IA as: • « boundarywork » between science and policy(Tuinstra 2007) • Meta-instrument withpoliticaleffects(Radaelli et Meuwese 2010:139) • coordination tool of EU policies(Adelle, Hertin, et Jordan 2006) • environmentalmainstreamingtool(Pollack et Hafner-Burton 2010) • legitimationtool(Bäcklund 2009)

  16. (Our graphic; based on Torriti, 2010)

  17. As a political tool, does EC-IA open the policy-making process and empower stakeholders supporting environmental agendas (environmental NGO’s, DG Environment, EEA, …)? • As conceptual tool, what is the impact of the EC-IA procedure on the definition of the “environment” within European policy-making? E.g. effects of quantification/monetisation?

  18. Thankyou for your attention Emilie Mutombo ejempaka@ulb.ac.be Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) IGEAT - Institute for Environmental Management and Land Use Planning CEDD - Centre for Studies on Sustainable Development http://igeat.ulb.ac.be

  19. A missing dimension: Participation • From information to participation • EC-IA as legitimation tool based on • « transparency washing » Or • Effective openness of the decision-making process

  20. 1c°] European Commission guidelines approach i.e. evidence-based, participative, linear approach • EC-IA as participative knowledge tool • 0°] the zero/realist (?) approach • EC-IA as evidence-based but merely tick the box bureaucratic tool turning primarily into a legitimation tool through transparency efforts

  21. 1a°] Evidence-based approach: • EC-IA as knowledge tool for direct decision support • 1b°] Science-policy interface approach: • EC-IA as “boundary work” or learning tool (oriented towards (indirect) decision-support) • 2a°] “instrument” approach • EC-IA as instrument with political (un)intended effects on power relations

  22. Our research approaches • 2b°] EC-IA as participative political tool: an approach studying the political effects of a potential redistribution of power-relations within an “open” decision-making process. • 2c°] EC-IA as conceptual political tool: an approach which looks at the political effect on the way environment is conceptualized within European decisions.

More Related