Using data to end homelessness
430 likes | 672 Vues
Using data to end homelessness. Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH Josh.bamberger@sfdph.org San Francisco Department of Public Health University of California, San Francisco, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine. Housing and Homeless Studies. Cost Before and after studies
Using data to end homelessness
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Using data to end homelessness Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH Josh.bamberger@sfdph.org San Francisco Department of Public Health University of California, San Francisco, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine
Housing and Homeless Studies • Cost • Before and after studies • Randomized controlled trials • Mortality • Retrospective case control • Quality of Life • Retrospective cohort studies • Populations based homeless prevalence • Creating a Narrative
Creating a Narrative • Housing is less expensive than homelessness • For people w/ homelessness and AIDS, ARVs are necessary but not sufficient to improve mortality • The right treatment for the condition
SF Health Dept’s Housing • Direct Access to Housing- 1600 units in 40 buildings • Tailor housing to needs of individual • Initially SRO, now new buildings • Priority to people with multiple disabilities • 93% with Axis I mental illness • At least 18% HIV+
Cost: Plaza Retrospective Before and After • 106 Chronically homeless adults • Cost year before housing: $3,132,856 • Cost year after housing: $906,228 • Reduction in healthcare costs: $2,226,568 • Cost of program: $1.1million/year • Reduction in public cost in first year: $1.1 million • More than 90% of reductionamong 15 tenants who cost more than $50,000/year prior to being housed • Regression to the mean
Cost: KCC Random assignment trial • Brand new building with 174 units • Homeless, high users of a managed care system • Comprehensive healthcare utilization • Randomly assigned to treatment or regular care • Followed prospectively for 5 years • Outcomes included: Healthcare cost, mortality, jail
Cost- 1811 Eastlake, Seattle • Compared to controls, housed Ps showed greater reductions in overall costs • Cost offsets of housing > $4m for 1st year • More time in housing associated with greater reduction in costs • 6-mo within-subjects reductions in typical alcohol use Figure and findings from Larimer et al. (2009)
Quality of Housing and Outcome • Ranking of housing from worst to best housing • Private bath better than shared bath • New building better than renovated • Nursing better than no nursing • Senior better than non-senior
Veteran PIT Counts, 2009-2012 * * CoCs only required to conduct a new count of unsheltered homelessness in odd numbered years; in 2012, only 32% of CoCs opted not to do a new unsheltered count, providing an incomplete picture of trends in the number of unsheltered homeless Veterans Source: PIT data, 2009 - 2012
Number of Homeless Veterans in 5 Communities with Greater than 40% reduction 2010-2012
Common aspects of “positive outliers” • Common values and philosophy of practice, strong leadership, housing first • Targeting • High level of communication (HIPPA busters) • Use of data to inform policy and measure success
Creating a Narrative • Housing is less expensive than homelessness • For people w/ homelessness and AIDS, ARVs are necessary but not sufficient to improve mortality • The right treatment for the condition
Using data to end homelessness Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH Josh.bamberger@sfdph.org San Francisco Department of Public Health University of California, San Francisco, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine