80 likes | 179 Vues
This document, presented by Aaron Wilson, provides valuable insights into the use of EML v2 standards in voting systems, as explored by the Scytl team across ten states. It details various interfaces employed, including onscreen marking and blank ballot delivery, as well as voter interfaces in CSV and XML formats. The report highlights key areas such as ballot tracking, duplication, and formatting variations encountered in election administration. The findings aim to enhance understanding of electronic data interchange in voting, emphasizing practical experiences and conclusions drawn from real-world applications.
E N D
Usage of EMLv2IEEE Standards Working Group P-1622 on Voting Systems Electronic Data InterchangeFebruary 9, 2011Aaron WilsonElection Operations Consultantaaron.wilson@scytl.com
2010 MOVE EVSW Implementation Experience • Scytl worked with 10 States • 9 Onscreen marking and blank ballot delivery • 1 Blank ballot only • Voter Interfaces – 13 (CSV, XML) • Ballot Definition Interfaces – 12 (CSV, XML) • EMS Vendor created file format • “home-grown” files format • Ballot Return Interfaces – 7 (CSV, XML, web-services) • Ballot tracking • Ballot duplication • Each format had multiple integrations • Formats represented many variations in election administration • Straight party voting • Candidate rotation • Federal only ballots • Latin and non-Latin languages • Formatting • Etc.