1 / 8

Enhancing Voting Systems Through EML v2: Insights from Scytl's Implementation in 10 States

This document, presented by Aaron Wilson, provides valuable insights into the use of EML v2 standards in voting systems, as explored by the Scytl team across ten states. It details various interfaces employed, including onscreen marking and blank ballot delivery, as well as voter interfaces in CSV and XML formats. The report highlights key areas such as ballot tracking, duplication, and formatting variations encountered in election administration. The findings aim to enhance understanding of electronic data interchange in voting, emphasizing practical experiences and conclusions drawn from real-world applications.

Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Voting Systems Through EML v2: Insights from Scytl's Implementation in 10 States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Usage of EMLv2IEEE Standards Working Group P-1622 on Voting Systems Electronic Data InterchangeFebruary 9, 2011Aaron WilsonElection Operations Consultantaaron.wilson@scytl.com

  2. 2010 MOVE EVSW Implementation Experience • Scytl worked with 10 States • 9 Onscreen marking and blank ballot delivery • 1 Blank ballot only • Voter Interfaces – 13 (CSV, XML) • Ballot Definition Interfaces – 12 (CSV, XML) • EMS Vendor created file format • “home-grown” files format • Ballot Return Interfaces – 7 (CSV, XML, web-services) • Ballot tracking • Ballot duplication • Each format had multiple integrations • Formats represented many variations in election administration • Straight party voting • Candidate rotation • Federal only ballots • Latin and non-Latin languages • Formatting • Etc.

  3. Agenda

  4. Motivation

  5. Usage

  6. Experience

  7. Conclusions

  8. . Internet voting Abentee

More Related