html5-img
1 / 15

Lifetime Value - a personal odyssey

Lifetime Value - a personal odyssey. John Whitehead WaterAid September 2011. Cash Gifts v. Committed Giving. It is much harder to model lifetime value for cash donors than for regular donors. Cash donors lapse after each gift, and you may only receive one or two gifts a year per donor.

wanda
Télécharger la présentation

Lifetime Value - a personal odyssey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lifetime Value - a personal odyssey John Whitehead WaterAid September 2011

  2. Cash Gifts v. Committed Giving • It is much harder to model lifetime value for cash donors than for regular donors. • Cash donors lapse after each gift, and you may only receive one or two gifts a year per donor. • Regular donors continue until cancellation and for monthlies you receive 12 gifts a year.

  3. How simplistic can you get? • One year value = annual value of the Direct Debit • Four year value = 4x annual value of the Direct Debit

  4. But we all know about attrition and how many donors you can lose in the first year.

  5. Version 1Baseline Lifetime Value • Simple Excel Model • Initial DD value, factoring monthly attrition

  6. Version 2 • Baseline model plus the following factors, with associated costs. • Channel • Recruitment costs • Annual stewardship costs • Gift Aid rates • DP opt-out rates • Upgrade propensity • Cash appeal responsiveness

  7. Over what period? • I year? • 5 years? • 10 years?

  8. The relative performance of different channels does depend on the time horizon • Face-to-face may well break even first by virtue of the high average gift value. • Even after two years inserts probably have a lower ROI than either DRTV or F2F. • At WaterAid inserts start to pull ahead after three years. • We look at net LTV after 5 years, by which time inserts lead DRTV with F2F in a poor third place. • But in detail, some DRTV segments and some insert segments deliver similar 5year LTV.

  9. However… • …At the end of 5 years you could well have lost less than 30% of your insert donors... • …nearly 50% of your DRTV donors… • …and 75% of your F2F donors. • So the story continues beyond 5 years

  10. Does “donor half life” help? • We lose 50% of our face 2 face donors in 12-14 months • We lose 50% of our DRTV donors in 60-64 months • But to lose 50% of our inserts donors takes over 120 months • Sadly, unlike radiation, the decay rate is not steady, so this judges channels like F2F too harshly...

  11. 5 Year Survival Rate • A channel with a high annual value and a high attrition rate may have a similar, or better 5yr LTV than a channel with a low annual value but a low attrition rate. • But you may have many more of the lower value donors left at the end of 5 years • Reporting the 5 year survival rate alongside LTV helps tell the full story.

  12. Our 5 year survival rates are something like this

  13. It’s all about survival folks!

More Related