SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree

washi avatar
9 diapositives · 409 Views · Jul 16, 2014

Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree. World hunger is a serious problem that needs attention Our country needs to address the growing number of homeless people The right to vote is one of the most valuable rights of US citizens

Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree - slide 1
01 / 9Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Mark: Strongly disagree/ disagree/ neutral/ agree/ strongly agree • World hunger is a serious problem that needs attention • Our country needs to address the growing number of homeless people • The right to vote is one of the most valuable rights of US citizens • Our government should spend less money on nuclear weapons and more on helping citizens better their lives.

  2. Indicate whether or not you regularly perform the stated behaviors • I personally donate money or write my representative to do something about world hunger • I volunteer in a homeless shelter or donate money to organizations that help the homeless. • I voted in the last election (if eligible) • I write to my representative or participate in protests to convey my feelings about nuclear weapons

  3. Attitudes • What is an attitude? • Belief, opinion with evaluative component • Functions? • Cognitive dissonance theory • Festinger • we we need our attitudes to be consistent with our behavior • it is uncomfortable for us when they aren’t • we seek ways to decrease discomfort caused by inconsistency

  4. Dissonance-reducing Mechanisms • Avoiding dissonant information • we attend to information in support of our existing views, rather than information that doesn’t support them • Sweeney & Gruber (1973) Watergate study • Firming up an attitude to be consistent with an action • set aside doubts/ uncertainty, become more confident after decision • effect of investing great effort, cost

  5. Dissonance-reducing Mechanisms • Changing an attitude to justify an action • when a person does something counter to their stated beliefs, then justify the deed by modifying their attitude • Insufficient-justification effect • change in attitude that occurs because person cannot justify an already completed action without modifying attitude • optimizing conditions include external justification, free choice, when action would cause harm

  6. Insufficient-justification effect • Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) • gave subjects a boring task, then asked subjects to lie to the next subject and say the experiment was exciting • paid ½ the subjects $1, other ½ $20 • then asked subjects to rate boringness of task • $1 group rated the task as far more fun than the $20 group • each group needed a justification for lying • $20 group had an external justification of money • since $1 isn’t very much money, $1 group said task was fun

  7. Using Attitudes as Ways to “Justify” Injustice • Just-world bias • a tendency to believe that life is fair • it would seem horrible to think that you can be a really good person and bad things could happen to you anyway • Just-world bias leads to “blaming the victim” • we explain others’ misfortunes as being their fault • e.g., she deserved to be raped, what was she doing in that neighborhood anyway?

  8. Summary • Perceiving & evaluating others • when we’re accurate, when we’re not • Attributions • person vs. situation attributions • the person bias • actor-observer discrepancy • effects of prior information • effects of physical appearance

  9. Summary • Stereotypes • what are they? • how do we study them? • Implicit stereotypes • Self-fulfilling prophecy effects • Attitudes • cognitive dissonance theory • dissonance-reducing mechanisms • the insufficient-justification effect • the just-world bias & blaming the victim