1 / 8

Health IT Provider Registry

Health IT Provider Registry. IHE Proposal Overview Proposed Editor: Shanks Kande, Marty Prahl (US Social Security Administration) October 7, 2009. Health IT Provider Registry (HITPR) Profile Proposal. The Problem domain Use Cases - Strategic Drivers HITPR – Context Architecture

wbyrd
Télécharger la présentation

Health IT Provider Registry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health IT Provider Registry IHE Proposal Overview Proposed Editor: Shanks Kande, Marty Prahl (US Social Security Administration) October 7, 2009 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  2. Health IT Provider Registry (HITPR) Profile Proposal • The Problem domain • Use Cases - Strategic Drivers • HITPR – Context Architecture • Proposed Standards & Systems • Discussion Items SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  3. The Problem domain • Provider Identification Inefficiency: • No standardized processes for electronically searching, using typical provider attributes, and with assurance, identifying the provider, location (physical, electronic end points), credentials and method for communication. • Multiple disparate provider information sources, each one holding a key piece of provider information • Dissemination of Provider Credentials: • Allow multiple trusted sources to publish provider credentials that can be distributed and accessible to consumers in real-time. • Provide tools for validation of provider credentials • Eliminate duplication of provider records across disparate data sources SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  4. Health IT Provider Registry (HITPR) definition • We envision HITPR as a unified directory of providers containing identifiers, demographic credentials, locations (physical, electronic) and relationship data • “Provider” is scoped for medical information entities such as physicians, medical laboratories, hospitals, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, diagnostic imaging professionals etc. • HITPR provides directory services to systems over a network or an information exchange using standards based messages SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  5. Use Cases: Strategic Drivers for health IT “meaningful use” SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  6. Trusted Source Public Lookup Hospitals Provider Information Federated Data Sourcing EMR Physicians Trusted Sources Commercial HITPR supports standards based query and publishing of data Consumers Secure Standards-based HITPR Federal & State Agencies & Health Institutes Publish Provider Information SSA, CDC, CMS, VHA DoD, etc. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  7. Proposed Standards & Systems • HL7 v3 which covers message standards, interactions and the XML data model for provider registry. • Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) – defines the messaging protocol, operations and data schema for directory services. • UDDI standard- OASIS approved standard that specifies protocols for creating a registry for Web services, methods for controlling access to the registry, and a mechanism for distributing or delegating records to other registries. Current NHIN registry specification uses UDDI standard. • ANSI ASC X12 –standard transaction set for interoperable EDI with registry. • Standard mechanism for registry replication between Master and slave nodes. • Meta Data based Registry supporting standards for: • Multiple Provider Identifiers and Demographic traits • Maintaining history of data (only deactivating record– no deleting of the data) • Relationships among entities (provider-organization, organization-facility, organization-Information Exchange) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

  8. Discussion Items • Immediate need of HITPR within US NHIN to facilitate nationwide directory services in support of “meaningful use” • The Provider Registry service is also desired in other countries: Canada, Australia, Germany • We propose the technical profile to be scoped for: • Defining Registry data model: Provider demographics, identifiers, locations, electronic service end points, business relationships, service dates, preferences, and status etc. • Defining message Interface (Publishing, Querying, Validating) • Synchronizing data with trusted sources • Replication techniques & Cross Community Access SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION-HIT SUPPORT

More Related