1 / 5

ILD LoI (Calorimeter part)

ILD LoI (Calorimeter part). 2008/12/14 K. Kawagoe. Expected LOI contents: final wording of IDAG additional requests. Detector optimization: identification of the major parameters which drive the total detector cost and its sensitivity to variations of these parameters.

weylin
Télécharger la présentation

ILD LoI (Calorimeter part)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ILD LoI (Calorimeter part) 2008/12/14 K. Kawagoe

  2. Expected LOI contents:final wording of IDAG additional requests • Detector optimization: identification of the major parameters which drive the totaldetector cost and its sensitivity to variationsof these parameters. • Plans for getting the necessary R&D results totransform the design concept into a well-defined detector proposal. • Conceptual design and implementation ofthe support structures and the dead zones in the detector simulation. • Sensitivity of different detector components to machine background in the context of the beam parameter space considered in the RDR. • Calibration and alignment schemes. • Estimates of overall size, weight, andrequirements for crane coverage and shielding. • Push-pull ability with respect to technicalaspects (assembly areas needed, detector transport and connections, time scale) and maintaining the detector performance for a stable and time-efficient operation. • A statement about energy coverage,identifying the deterioration of theperformance at energies up to 1 TeVand the consequent detector upgrades.

  3. Proposal of Jean-Claude, Based on a TOTAL of 12 pages • Introduction on PFA based calorimetry (1 page) • suppose the names of the mail are the good one (Kiyotomo, Felix, Imad and myself) • I would see here the R&D needed and the CALICE organization per project (who is doing what) and the expected test beam plan (Is it possible for you Felix,(as spokesperson of CALICE) to write a first draft of that part) • Mechanics (3 pages ) Resp: including (as Felix said), structure and specificity of each technology option • For ECAL Si and Scint. : Marc Anduze • For AHCAL : • For DHCAL : • VFE and FE (DIF) (1 page) Resp: • For ECAL (both Si and Scint., if Kiyotomo agrees) : Julien, Remi and Bart • For AHCAL : Ludovic and Mathias • For DHCAL : ??? (not Julie, since LAPP is not in ILD ) please Imad give us a name • DAQ (1 page) Resp Valeria (for LDA-ODR) , Vincent (for DHCAL) • TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS(1.5 page per option) • ECAL silicon – tungsten : Resp: Remi , Roman (1page, essentially on silicon wafers, long slab ASU) • ECAL scintillator – tungsten : Resp : Tohru, Kiyotomo, Satoru • HCAL sctinillator : Resp • DHCAL gas : Resp

  4. Technology-specific sections, each with a different structure, example here for AHCALSi ECALSci ECALSci HCALactive layer overview, integration schemescintillators, photo-sensorsPCB integrationcalibration methods, calibration systemcabling, services and detector integrationtechnology-specific R&D issuesDHCALFE Electronicsto be worked out by JulienASICs, analogue, digital, trigger, power, packaging, testing, R&D Technology-specific sections (From Felix) Dear Jean-Claude, Kiyotomo, Imad, Technology-specific sections, each with a different structure, example here for AHCAL • Si ECAL • Sci ECAL • Sci HCAL • active layer overview, integration scheme • scintillators, photo-sensors • PCB integration • calibration methods, calibration system • cabling, services and detector integration • technology-specific R&D issues • DHCAL

  5. Supplement: 担当 (2) これまでの結果をふまえたR&Dの将来計画 (魚住がリスト案を作る) - MPPC - scintillator production - simulationの確立(データと合わせる) (4) 情報収集(竹下) (5)MIP calibration(信州)LED calibration(神戸) (8)ストリップクラスタリングについては小寺さん   そのうえで、これまでのR&Dで確立された点、有利な点などを強調するようにする。あとは、SiWやAHCALとの議論。こちらからコンタクトした方がよい。

More Related