1 / 31

Impact of lithium-coated walls on plasma performance in the TJ-II Stellarator

Impact of lithium-coated walls on plasma performance in the TJ-II Stellarator. J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión. CIEMAT 28040 Madrid, Spain. Outlook. Introduction Why Lithium? Plasma Wall Interaction in TJ-II Li coating technique Results

willa
Télécharger la présentation

Impact of lithium-coated walls on plasma performance in the TJ-II Stellarator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impact of lithium-coated walls on plasma performance in the TJ-II Stellarator J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión. CIEMAT 28040 Madrid, Spain J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  2. Outlook • Introduction • Why Lithium? • Plasma Wall Interaction in TJ-II • Li coating technique • Results • Particle recycling and confinement • Edge parameters and impurity generation • Plasma profiles • Radiation and energy confinement • ELMs and Enhanced Confinement • Conclusions J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  3. TJ-II stellarator 4.6 m Vertical field coils Vacuum vessel Plasma Toroidal field coils Central coil system J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  4. Plasmas in TJ-II Heliac Stellarator 4 periods R=1.5 m <a>= 15-25 cm BT=1 T ECH : 2x300kW,53.6 GHz NBI:2x500 kW, 40 KeV Vol Plasma ~ 1m3 P0=5.10-8 mbar Low Z scenarios : - 2 Graphite Limiters - First Wall Boronization Scientific goals: Scan in magnetic configuration high operation J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  5. Why Li? - Very low Z - High impurity getter (O2,N2,CO, H2O,CO2…) - Strong H retention (LiH) - Low melting point: Liquid PFC - Effect on C sputtering OK (H. Sugai, JNM 1998) Very good results in Tokamaks: TFTR, CDX-U, FTU, T-10, T-11M…. Different ways of deposition; Liquid tray, pellets, LLL, CPS, evaporation…… But : problems in reproduce beneficial effect: Total coverage?? Lithium in Tokamaks TJ-II: first stellarator operated under Li walls J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  6. 0.12 0 -0.12 -0.24 -0.36 -0.2 0 0.2 P-W Interaction in TJ-II Central Coil Z (m) R-R (m) 0 J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  7. 0.12 0 -0.12 -0.24 -0.36 -0.2 0 0.2 P-W Interaction in TJ-II H a Central Coil Z (m) gass-puff hole R-R (m) 2 Instrumented Limiters, 180 º 0 But:no limiter effect for <2.5 cm insertion in ECRH plasmas J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  8. PW Interaction and Edge Diagnostics PWI mainly on Toroidal limiter (VV) Edge diagnostics:-Supersonic He beam (ne, Te, Ti)1,2 - Recip. Langmuir Probes - Reflectometry - Fast Cameras3 - LIF…. See P 1-18 Tabarés et al See P 2-43 Guzmán et al See P 3-39 Carralero et al J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  9. a t 4.5x1020 . o m s H Uncontrolled density GD He 1 2 2 8 0 1 2 2 8 5 1 2 2 9 0 1 2 2 9 5 1 2 3 0 S h o t ( # ) 10-15 dis. Density control under wall saturation (ECRH) Wall Conditioning: • Metal walls +He GD+Ar GD: He release, Enhanced Particle Confinement transition • (EPC, F.L. Tabarés et al PPCF 2001) • -Boronization: O-carborane+He GD, 4 Ovens:1g/oven, 80ºC • ….. wall saturation ( <20 discharges)+ EPC Particle balance in B Saturation @ 4.1020 Interaction area~ 1-2 m2 J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  10. Density control under wall saturation (ECRH) J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  11. Lithium coating in TJ-II How? • - 4 ovens, symmetric,tangential LOS • 4 g deposited each time (600ºC) • Role of background pressure: - HV: line of sight - 10-3-10-5mbar: diffusion - Ne GD+ ovens As deposited (HV) Deposition on top of B-coated walls Re-distribution by plasma: Improving with operation time!! After 2 days J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  12. Li Coating Technique 4 Lithium ovens: 2 fixed (side windows) and 2 in retractable manipulators (top windows) Emission of Li injected from a retractable oven 1 gr of Li per oven, heated to ~600 ºC during Ne GD J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  13. 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Li-wall experimental campaigns in TJ-II • May-June 2007: 4 g fully evaporated under vacuum. Li-wall plasmas: ECRH/NBI H plasmas • Nov-Dec 2007: B wall reference discharges ECRH/NBI H Plasmas + Improvement of NBI and ECRH heating systems • Feb-June 2008: New Li-W Campaign: Refreshing of Li layer by repetitive evaporation: H/He/ECRH/NBI Plasmas Diamagnetic energy vs. plasma density Operational Window: B vs Li • wall / plasma • B / H • Li / H • Li / He Diamagnetic energy (kJ) line density (1019 m-3) J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  14. Li-wall experimental campaigns in TJ-II • May-June 2007: 4 g fully evaporated under vacuum. Li-wall plasmas: ECRH/NBI H plasmas • Nov-Dec 2007: B wall reference discharges ECRH/NBI H Plasmas + Improvement of NBI and ECRH heating systems • Feb-June 2008: New Li-W Campaign: Refreshing of Li layer by repetitive evaporation: H/He/ECRH/NBI Plasmas * Li/He (NBI 1+2) Operational Window: B vs Li • wall / plasma • B / H • Li / H • Li / He J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  15. Impact on plasmas ECRH B wall Li wall J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  16. Particle Control Li vs B Total wall inventory > 3 times, no sign of saturation J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  17. Dynamic particle balance dN/dt= f. Qin-N/(p/1-R) He plasmas: R<1!!, enhanced contamination For ECRH plasmas: f ~1, t peff ~8 ms, R<0.2 ne ne gas gas J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  18. Shot 17813 m2 Density control improving with plasma operation: m2=dne/dt approaching nominal beam fuelling rate! (~1020 e-/s) t ms Shot 17825 12 shots later m2 J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  19. J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  20. Edge Parameters-1 He beam at three different times: evolution of edge profiles J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  21. Edge Parameters-2 B wall Te t3 ne t1 t2 Li wall Te:Similar edge values but steeper profiles. Transient cooling in Li wall Ne:Transient rise of density gradient, but recovers in density-controlled discharges Te ne t2 t1 t3 J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  22. Impurity composition/generation Impurity (Li) generation SXR profiles • From spectroscopy, Li/ H~0.44% • for R=20%, Li/ H~9.10-4 8 µm Be But…expected?: 33 µm Be • Li/H= SH/1-S’ss, S’ss= Sss-(1-Rn) • Li/Hsputt~3.10-2 • Reduction>30x!! - No contribution of O radiation J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  23. Shot # 17941 5 250 Prad LITHIUM 4 200 ), Wdia (kJ), SRX (a.u.) 3 150 Prad (kW) ne Wdia 2 100 -3 m SXR -19 1 50 ne (10 Pnbi 0 0 1050 1100 1150 1200 time(ms) Profile shape: impurity & ne behavior same global parameters but... noncollapsing collapsing BELL DOME central impurity peaking 0.25 Wcm-3 0.14 Wcm-3 edge thermal instability J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  24. 4 0,6 3 0,4 2 0,2 1 0 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 Profile shape: impurity & ne behavior same global parameters but... noncollapsing collapsing BELL DOME ne DOMEBELL ne ne (10 Zeff eff Z 20 m -3 ) Zeff r eff J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  25. Energy Confinement Boron Li (dome) Li (bell) J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  26. ELM activity and transitions ELM J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  27. Coating System Upgrade • Searching for homogeneity: • 8 ovens, loaded for repetitive, in situ evaporation ( 6-8 cycles) • Diffusion can help: F dif.= 1/3 l.v.n/a, l @10-5 mbar He ~80cm x a He Li beam F parallel. = 1/2 n.v • Free Parameters: • Type of gas • Bkgnd pressure • Distance between ovens n (x)~1/x2.exp(-x/l) Fdiff (x)＝ n0exp(-x/l)/l.2pa, l~1/PHe Long term: LLL in TJ-II(?) J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  28. Conclusions • Li coating by evaporation was performed in TJ-II. • Only a partial coverage initially achieved, but evolved with plasma interaction • Machine operation more reliable and reproducible • Extended operational window • Density control highly improved, long lasting effect • Strong change in particle recycling • Good impurity control, but still C dominated (?) • Strong confinement improvement in NBI plasmas. • ELM activity observed at critical densities ~1.1.1013 cm-3 • Change in plasma profiles depending on fuelling rate/edge cooling • Improvement of technique still possible J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  29. Thanks for your attention! J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  30. Comments onBoronization • Wall Conditioning • Boronization: highly recommended! • How: In TJ-II: o-carborane sublimated at < 80ºC in He GD • 4 ovens, 4 anodes, 4 Turbopumps(4000l/s nominal), 1/2 h+ GD He • afterwards for H depletion: Good homogeneity…50 nm aprox. • but…it can be performed more easily • Parameter of merit: degree of dissociation o-carb < ~80% • 1 Turbo, 2 ovens, 1 anode ? • res= V/S~1-2 s in TJ-II, ne He GD ~109 cm-3, Te~3-5 eV dN/dt=Q/V-Kd.ne.N-N/r =0 Degree of cracking= N/N0=1/(1+Kd.ne.r) For high r, lower ne (Ip) required (but more film contamination?) J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

  31. H/He NBI • Similar Ti • values for H • and He target • plasmas! • Ti~Te at • high ne (up • to 140 eV in H • targets) H plasma He plasma J. Sánchez and the TJ-II Team, 18th PSI. Toledo,26-30 May 2008

More Related