1 / 12

The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs

The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Friederike Range, Lisa Horn, Zsófia Viranyi , & Ludwig Huber. Presentation by Christy Samuels. Why test dogs on inequality aversion?.

wilmer
Télécharger la présentation

The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The absence of reward inducesinequity aversion in dogs FriederikeRange, Lisa Horn, ZsófiaViranyi, & Ludwig Huber Presentation by Christy Samuels

  2. Why test dogs on inequality aversion? • It seems likely that a part of the evolution of cooperation is the ability to compare others’ efforts and gains to one’s own • Non-human primates have been shown to abstain from cooperative problem-solving tasks if they observe a conspecific receive a higher-value reward for the same effort • This inequity aversion hadn’t been studied in non-primates

  3. Previous studies with primates • http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v425/n6955/full/nature01963.html • Capuchin monkeys exchanged a token with an experimenter for a food reward • The monkeys refused to participate if they saw a conspecific get a higher-value reward for the same effort • This effort effect could not be replicated as decisively in another study, but it seems capuchin monkeys have some sensitivity to unequal reward distribution

  4. Method • 29 dogs in the first experiment, 14 in the second • For each session, dogs were paired and asked to “give paw” • This was repeated for 30 trials, or until the subject refused to work • The experimenter did not communicate with the dogs except to give the command “paw”, and both high-value (sausage) and low-value (dark bread) rewards were present in all sessions

  5. Test conditions

  6. Results • The subjects stopped giving their paw sooner when their partner received a reward and they did not

  7. Results cont. • The subjects also needed to be prompted more and showed more signs of stress in the reward inequity (RI) condition than in the baseline or asocial control

  8. Experiment 2 • To control for the presence of the partner, the researchers did a follow-up study • They repeated the reward inequity (RI) condition and added a social control (SC) where neither dog received a reward

  9. Discussion • These experiments provide evidence for sensitivity toward an unequal reward distribution in a cooperative, non-primate species • The dogs refused to “give paw” earlier, hesitated longer, and showed more signs of stress when their partner received a reward and they did not • The dogs did not act differently when their partner received a higher-value reward

More Related