1 / 23

Semantic Description of Musical Audio

IPEM – DEPARTMENT OF MUSICOLOGY | GHENT UNIVERSITY – BELGIUM. Semantic Description of Musical Audio. EVELINE HEYLEN | Eveline.Heylen@UGent.be PROMOTORS | PROF. DR. LEMAN (IPEM) & PROF. DR. IR. MARTENS (ELIS). PROBLEM SPECIFICATION. Background?. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION. Problem?

wilson
Télécharger la présentation

Semantic Description of Musical Audio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IPEM – DEPARTMENT OF MUSICOLOGY | GHENT UNIVERSITY – BELGIUM Semantic Description of Musical Audio EVELINE HEYLEN | Eveline.Heylen@UGent.be PROMOTORS | PROF. DR. LEMAN (IPEM) & PROF. DR. IR. MARTENS (ELIS)

  2. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION Background?

  3. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION Problem? COMPLEX relation between: • structural description of musical signals • semantic description of musical experiences

  4. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION My research task… • structural annotation: i.e. rythm, melody, tempo, harmony… • semantic annotation: i.e. study concerning appreciation of perceived musical characteristics (affects, emotions…) • necessary for: • training of computer algorithms • understanding user behaviour

  5. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION Strategic applications? • audio-mining • new and flexible MIR • interactive multimedia • devices dealing with gestures, affect… • artistic and every day use • brain research • determining brain activity

  6. EXAMPLE OF SEMANTIC RESEARCH IN MUSIC

  7. SPEAC What? Sensitive Processing of Artistic Content research on: • effects of gender, taste, education, musical background… • structures in the emotional space • relations emotional responses ~ auditory features

  8. SPEAC How? • 100 students • electronic evaluation • 60 excerpts • 30” duration • different genres • 15 bipolar adjectives • 7-point scale  correlations + factor analysis

  9. SPEAC VALENCE  base = (un)favorable qualifications ACTIVITY  base = movement or power INTEREST  base = interest

  10. SPEAC Further… • familiarity • woman • broad tasted subjects • musical training Examples most moving | most exciting

  11. MASTER’S THESIS RESULTS

  12. TONALITY Motive? • publication Toiviainen & Krumhansl • concurrent probe tone method • applicability? feasibility? • results  new method for inducing tonality

  13. TONALITY Concrete? ≠ artificial stimuli, but natural stimuli • world • daily touch with natural sound ≠ indication task, butproduction task • ecological value • individual capacities

  14. TONALITY Experiment • 26 subjects • 20 one-minute excerpts • classical and non-classical music • consistent timbre (strings) and equal tempo (120 MM) • sing the most fitting tones… • learning and performing by imitation  undertone method

  15. TONALITY NOTE: Y-axis = sung total in time X-axis = circle of fifths C auditive analysis tone centre c G - D - A score analysis D minor

  16. TONALITY NOTE: Y-axis = sung total in time X-axis = circle of fifths C – G – D – A auditive analysis pentatonic scale on D = heterogeneous output…

  17. TONALITY Additional appreciation experiment • same 26 subjects • same 20 one-minute excerpts • draw musical progress + fill in questionnaire  graphical ratings // musical aspects?  results questionnaire // SPEAC?

  18. compilation kanasztancok: angular, pointed patterns – standstill!

  19. compilation horror: main pattern = scribble

  20. compilation tiersen: small waving patterns, steady periods

  21. FUTURE PLANNING

  22. FUTURE PLANNING • finish tonality research • improvements • compare with key extraction model (IPEM toolbox) • music annotation • large experiment (750 subjects) • structural features (tonality, rythm, melody…) • semantic features (musical affect, emotion…) • algorithm training + understanding user behavior • sensory-motor theory of perception

  23. Thank you for your attention! Questions?

More Related