1 / 31

ETHICAL & PRACTICAL ISSUES IN THE ELDERLY

ETHICAL & PRACTICAL ISSUES IN THE ELDERLY. Dr. Angela M. Campbell Lourdes Medical Association Conference RCPSG 1 st February 2014. WHAT IS GERIATRIC MEDICINE ?.

Télécharger la présentation

ETHICAL & PRACTICAL ISSUES IN THE ELDERLY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ETHICAL & PRACTICAL ISSUES IN THE ELDERLY Dr. Angela M. Campbell Lourdes Medical Association Conference RCPSG 1st February 2014

  2. WHAT IS GERIATRIC MEDICINE ? • “ Geriatric Medicine is a whole person specialty. Based on a solid infrastructure of general medicine , it involves consideration of psychological , social and spiritual dimensions , together with functional and environmental assessments. A Geriatrician needs to be aware of legal aspects – capacity and consent , human rights , guardianship ; and ethical conundrums , such as when to investigate or treat ” Prof. G. Mulley : A career in Geriatric Medicine ( BGS Newsletter August 2007 )

  3. THE ELDERLY IN SOCIETY • Demographic changes - the very elderly, over 85s , are the fastest growing section of society • Health economic implications – increasing need and cost of health and social care for the frail elderly population • Changing role of the elderly in society – contribution and quality of life

  4. PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS • Autonomy – authentic “ self-determination ” influenced by information given , cognition , mood , and personal versus societal values • Justice – “ fair ” allocation of health and social care resources based on need and without discrimination • Beneficence – “ do good ” • Non-maleficence – “ do no harm ”

  5. ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE • Witholding and withdrawing treatment e.g. enteral nutrition , CPR • Consent and mental capacity • Advanced directives • Euthanasia ( “ a good death ” )

  6. WHAT IS MENTAL CAPACITY ? • An adult is “ capable ” if he or she has : • Received information to make a decision • Is not under pressure from someone else • Can communicate the decision • Consistently holds to this decision

  7. WHAT IS MENTAL INCAPACITY ? • An adult is “ incapable ”if he or she : • Cannot act or make decisions or communicate decisions or understand decisions or retain memory of the decision - because of mental disorder or inability to communicate • Not all or none • May be capable of certain types of decisions but not others

  8. AWISA ( 2000 ) & MENTAL CAPACITY ACT ( 2005 ) - GENERAL PRINCIPLES • Benefit the adult • Take account of adult`s past and present wishes • Take account of views of relevant others • Use the least restrictive power possible • Adult must be encouraged to use existing skills

  9. AREAS COVERED • Decisions about a) money and property b) health and welfare c) both • Intervention order - covers single issue e.g. property sale • Guardianship order - covers long-term needs e.g. in dementia

  10. GUARDIANSHIP • 2 doctors` reports confirming incapacity • Mental Health Officer report ( if welfare ) • Relevant adult ( if financial only ) • Granted by a sheriff and registered by the Public Guardian • Usually for 3 years but may be indefinite

  11. CURRENT USE • Many elderly in institutional care are incapable – certificate and treatment plan reviewed annually ( now every 3 years if established incapacity ) • Emergency treatment exempt but must consult proxy for other interventions e.g. elective surgery , enteral nutrition , antibiotics • Proxy decision makers may be formal welfare guardian or informal e.g. NOK

  12. GUIDANCE ON ETHICAL ISSUES • Hippocratic Oath e.g. “ no intentional killing by act or omission ” • Professional bodies e.g. BMA, GMC , BGS • “ Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation : a joint statement ” BMA , Resuscitation Council ( UK ) , RCN ( 2007 ) • “ Treatment and care towards the end of life : good practice in decision making ” GMC ( 2010 ) • Theological guidance e.g. CTS 2010

  13. GMC GUIDANCE : END OF LIFE CARE • “ Good end of life care helps patients with life-limiting conditions to live as well as possible until they die , and to die with dignity ” • End of life conditions – progressive conditions , organ or systems failure , acute catastrophic events , PVS • Most difficult decisions are often around starting or stopping potentially life-prolonging treatments – benefit versus burden of care

  14. GMC GUIDANCE : ETHICAL PRINCIPLES • Based on Human Rights Act ( 1998 ) • Presumption in favour of prolonging life • Offer treatments where possible benefits outweigh any burdens or risks • Avoid treatments which will not work , provide no overall benefit or have been refused by a competent patient • If patient incompetent must consult Welfare POA / Guardian / Advocate , healthcare team and take into account e.g. advance directive

  15. GMC GUIDANCE : CLINICAL JUDGEMENT • Refer to relevant clinical guidelines for specific conditions • Seek opinion of relevant specialist • Communicate effectively with patient or relevant others to ensure realistic understanding of expected outcome and benefits , burdens and risks of interventions • If patient incompetent and there is uncertainty about overall benefit treatment should be started , reviewed and later stopped if ineffective or too burdensome • Ethically witholding and withdrawing treatment are the same but the latter is often emotionally more difficult – this should not affect clinical judgement • Resource constraints may be an issue

  16. GMC GUIDANCE :CLINICALLYASSISTED NUTRITION & HYDRATION ( 1 ) • Need to assess patient`s nutritional and hydration status and ensure that this is optimised where possible via the oral route • In patients unable to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration status orally options include IV or S/C fluids , NG , or RIG / PEG feeding • “ The current evidence about the benefits and burdens of these techniques in treating and managing patients towards the end of life is not clear cut ”

  17. ACUTE STROKE Dysphagia common but usually resolves within a month Severe stroke and persistent dysphagia has high mortality PEG / RIG superior to NG DEMENTIA Dysphagia versus food refusal Mortality at 1 year 87% ( in stroke 56% ) Meta-analysis showed no significant benefit ENTERAL FEEDING

  18. GMC GUIDANCE : CLINICALLY-ASSISTED NUTRITION & HYDRATION ( 2 ) • If these might prolong a patient`s life then treatment should be offered • “ Where a patient`s death is not imminent but their condition is severe and the prognosis very poor you may consider that clinically-assisted nutrition and hydration , while likely to prolong their life , will cause them suffering which could be intolerable ” • “ You must seek a second or expert opinion from a senior clinician……..You should also consider seeking legal advice ”

  19. EUTHANASIA “ A GOOD DEATH ” • Killing is murder and assisting suicide a criminal offence • A competent patient can refuse treatment • Treatment of an incompetent patient should be in their best interest.This may be by witholding burdensome treatment or providing palliative treatment that could shorten life – “ doctrine of double effect ” • “ Burden ” of care versus sanctity of life • “ Slippery slope ” - a right to die or a duty to die ?

  20. LIVERPOOL CARE PATHWAY

  21. LIVERPOOL CARE PATHWAY • ICP designed to manage the care of a person in the last days or hours of life - facilitates MDT communication / documentation • Criteria for use – possible reversible causes for current condition have been considered ; MDT agreed that patient is dying ; 2 of following apply : bedbound , semi-comatose , unable to take sips of fluid , no longer able to take tablets

  22. LCP – ANTICIPATORY PRESCRIBING • Pain – Morphine • Nausea – Levomepromazine • Agitation – Midazolam • Excess respiratory secretions – Hyoscine butylbromide

  23. LCP - CONTROVERSY • Care or neglect ? • “ Pathway to death ” • Hospice vs acute hospital setting • Diagnosis of “ dying ” • Ethical principles • Training & audit

  24. 10 KEY LCP MESSAGES • LCP is only as good as those who use it • LCP should not be used without education & training • Good communication is pivotal to success • LCP neither hastens nor postpones death • Diagnosis of dying should be made by the MDT • LCP does not recommend use of deep continuous sedation • LCP does not preclude “ artificial ” hydration • LCP supports continual reassessment • Reflect , audit , measure & learn • Stop , think , assess , change

  25. NEUBERGER REPORT ON THE LCP “ MORE CARE LESS PATHWAY ” JULY 2013 • Nutrition & hydration in the last days and hours of life • Recognising the uncertainty of the diagnosis of dying • Communication with patients and families and between staff

  26. INTERIM GUIDANCE :CARING FOR PEOPLE IN THE LAST DAYS & HOURS OF LIFE ( KEY PRINCIPLES ) NHS SCOTLAND DECEMBER 2013 • Communication • MDT discussion and decision making • Address physical , psychological , social and spiritual needs • Consider needs of relatives and carers

  27. ISSUES ON PILGRIMAGE TO LOURDES • Elderly – assess co-morbidities , function and cognition , capacity , polypharmacy and medication administration • Management of symptoms – prior to travel on pilgrimage seek advice / care plan from local Palliative care team • Consider and discuss potential impact of journey and pilgrimage on symptoms • Clarify insight of pilgrim and their relatives on prognosis and establish if there is an ACP • Insurance cover - implications of change / deterioration in condition and of hospitalisation in France

More Related