300 likes | 307 Vues
Explore the history and management response to the hypoxia problem in Chesapeake Bay, including dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient pollution, and water quality improvement goals.
E N D
Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia: History and Management Response Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rob Magnien NOAA Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research
Chesapeake Bay Summer Anoxic/Hypoxic Volumes and Winter-Spring Flow: 1949-2003 1957-1950 1952 1949- 1950 1960-1963 1972 1967-1968 1978-1980 June 1984-December 2003 Source: www.chesapeakebay.net
Calculated Summer Anoxic/Hypoxic Volumes and Model Predictions: 1950-2001 Source: Hagy et al. 2004
Summer dissolved oxygen profiles in Chesapeake Bay: Four years with near average January–May Susquehanna River flow Extent of Anoxic Conditions Source: Hagy et al. 2004
January A Year in Chesapeake Bay Dissolved Oxygen: 2004 February March April May Early June Late June Early July Late July Early August Late August September October November December
2006 Chesapeake Bay Mainstem Anoxic Volume Forecast Red zone indicates forecast area Forecast Volume Algal index = spring Susq. TN, TP + N. Bay PS TN, TP Observed Volume 95% Confidence Interval Source: www.chesapeakebay.net/bayforecastspring2006.htm
Over 90% of the Bay and its tidal rivers are impaired due to low dissolved oxygen levels and poor water clarity, all related to nutrient and sediment pollution. Impaired Water Source: U.S. EPA
Partners Commitment to Restored Bay Water Quality “By 2010, correct the nutrient‑ and sediment‑related problems in the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries...” Step 1: What is the water quality of a restored Bay? Step 2: How much pollution do we need to reduce? Step 3: What actions do we need to take to reduce pollution? Source: Chesapeake Executive Council 2000
What Do We Want to Achieve? Water quality that supports abundant fish, crabs, oysters and underwater grasses in the Bay and its rivers. Source: Chesapeake Executive Council 2000
Water Quality in a Restored Bay • Fewer algae blooms and better fish food. • Clearer water and more underwater Bay grasses. • More oxygen and improved habitat for more fish, crabs and oysters. Source: U.S. EPA 2003a
Refined Designated Uses forthe Bay and Tidal Tributary Waters A. Cross Section of Chesapeake Bay or Tidal Tributary Shallow-Water Bay Grass Use Open-Water Fish and Shellfish Use Deep-Water Seasonal Fish and Shellfish Use Deep-Channel Seasonal Refuge Use B. Oblique View of the “Chesapeake Bay” and its Tidal Tributaries Migratory Fish Spawning and Nursery Use Open-Water Habitat Shallow-Water Bay Grass Use Deep-Water Seasonal Fish and Shellfish Use Deep-Channel Seasonal Refuge Use Source: U.S. EPA 2003b
Bay Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Minimum Amount of Oxygen (mg/L) Needed to Survive by Species Migratory Fish Spawning & Nursery Areas 6 Striped Bass: 5-6 American Shad: 5 Shallow and Open Water Areas 5 White Perch: 5 4 Yellow Perch: 5 Hard Clams: 5 Deep Water Alewife: 3.6 3 Bay Anchovy: 3 Crabs: 3 2 Deep Channel 1 Spot: 2 Worms: 1 0 Source: U.S. EPA 2003a
Chesapeake Bay Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Designated Use Criteria Concentration/Duration Protection Provided Temporal Application Migratory fish spawning and nursery use 7-day mean > 6 mg liter-1 (tidal habitats with 0-0.5 ppt salinity) Survival/growth of larval/juvenile tidal-fresh resident fish.; protectiveof threatened/endangered species. February 1 - May 31 Instantaneous minimum > 5 mg liter-1 Survival and growth of larval/juvenile migratory fish; protective of threatened/endangered species. Open-water fish and shellfish designated use criteria apply June 1 - January 31 Shallow-water bay grass use Open-water fish and shellfish designated use criteria apply Year-round Open-water fish and shellfish use 30-day mean > 5.5 mg liter-1 (tidal habitats with 0-0.5 ppt salinity) Growth of tidal-fresh juvenile and adult fish; protective of threatened/endangered species. Year-round 30-day mean > 5 mg liter-1 (tidal habitats with >0.5 ppt salinity) Growth of larval, juvenile and adult fish and shellfish; protectiveof threatened/endangered species. 7-day mean > 4 mg liter-1 Survival of open-water fish larvae. Instantaneous minimum > 3.2 mg liter-1 Survival of threatened/endangered sturgeon species.1 Deep-water seasonal fish and shellfish use 30-day mean > 3 mg liter-1 Survival and recruitment of bay anchovy eggs and larvae. June 1 - September 30 1-day mean > 2.3 mg liter-1 Survival of open-water juvenile and adult fish. Instantaneous minimum > 1.7 mg liter-1 Survival of bay anchovy eggs and larvae. Open-water fish and shellfish designated-use criteria apply October 1 - May 31 Deep-channel seasonal refuge use Instantaneous minimum > 1 mg liter-1 Survival of bottom-dwelling worms and clams. June 1 - September 30 Open-water fish and shellfish designated use criteria apply October 1 - May 31 1 At temperatures considered stressful to shortnose sturgeon (>29EC), dissolved oxygen concentrations above an instantaneous minimum of 4.3 mg liter-1 will protect survival of this listed sturgeon species.
Scientific Basis for Decisions was Documented by the Partners
Bay Criteria, Uses Adopted in State WQS Regulations • DE (2004), MD (2005), VA 2005/2006), DC (2006) • Standards adopted in terms of designated use by CBP segment • WQ criteria, uses, attainment assessment methods essentially fully consistent across jurisdictions
Chesapeake Bay Program Models Chesapeake Bay Airshed Model Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model Hydrodynamic Model Sediment Process Model Zooplankton Model Phytoplankton Model Sediment Transport Model Benthic Infauna Model SAV/Light Model Oyster Filter Feeders Model
Chesapeake Bay ProgramCurrent Modeling Structure Estuary Model Airshed Model Watershed Model
phosphorus nitrogen Nutrient Loadings vs. Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment 337 285 175 26.5 19.1 12.8 Millions of pounds per year % Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment
Nutrient pollution loads have differing impacts on the Bay water quality, depending on where they come from.
Allocating Responsibility for Reducing Nutrients and Sediments ...then by 20 major tributary basins by jurisdiction …then by 44 state-defined tributary strategy subbasins By 9 major river basins Watershed States Responsibility Watershed States Responsibility Watershed Partners Responsibility
Nutrient and Sediment Cap Load Allocations • Science-based • Equitable • Based on pollution contribution to Bay/river water quality • Adopted by the six watershed states’ Governors, the DC Mayor and EPA Adminstrator in 2003
Basinwide Permitting Approach • Unprecedented multi-state permitting agreement • Annual load limits vs. monthly conc. limits • Watershed-based permitting • Addresses complex compliance schedule issues • Addresses monitoring requirements and reporting schedules
The Forthcoming Next Generation of Bay Models Nitrate and ammonia deposition from improved Daily Nitrate and Ammonium Concentration Models using 35 monitoring stations over 18 simulation years. Adjustments to deposition from Models-3/Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Phase 5 Watershed Model Year-to-year changes in land use and BMPs; 899 segments; 24 land uses; 296 calibration stations; 21 simulation years; sophisticated calibration procedures; calibration demonstrably better in quality and scale Chesapeake Bay Estuary Model Detailed sediment input; Wave model for resuspension, Full sediment transport; Filter feeder simulation; Simulation of Potomac algal blooms; 54,000 model cells; 18 simulation years
Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410-267-5731 batiuk.richard@epa.gov www.chesapeakebay.net