1 / 22

Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students

Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students. U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary & Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) Implementation and Support Unit (ISU).

wromero
Télécharger la présentation

Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Elementary & Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) Implementation and Support Unit (ISU)

  2. Factors that Affect the FY 2014 & SY 2014-2015 Allocations Todd Stephenson Management and Program Analyst, Student Achievement and School Accountability (SASA) July 2014

  3. Flow of Funds Under Title I, Part A Formulas Basic Grants Concentration Grants Targeted Grants EFIG ED ED ED ED LEAs LEAs LEAs LEAs Schools U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  4. Factors that Affect SY 2014-2015 Allocations • Census Data • Non-Census Data • State per-pupil expenditures • Amount appropriated • Hold-harmless guarantee • Small State minimum U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  5. Census Data • ED used 2012 Census data to calculate FY 2014 (SY 2014-2015) Title I allocations. • Use of updated 2012 Census estimates continues process initiated by ESEA, as amended, that requires census data be updated annually. • Last year ED used 2011 Census data to allocate FY 2013 (SY 2013-2014) Title I funds. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  6. 2012 Census Updates 2012 Census updates are “model”- based estimates that incorporate data from-- • The American Community Survey (ACS); • Federal income tax returns; • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); • The Supplemental Security Income program; • Surveys conducted by the Bureau of Economic Analysis; and • The most recent decennial census and intercensal population estimates. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  7. Impact of 2012 Census Estimates Nationally • Total number of children from low-income families ages 5 – 17 in U.S. increased by 88,665(0.8%) in 2012 to 11.4 million. • Updated 2012 national poverty rate is 21.0%--up from 20.8% in 2011 and 19.8% in 2010. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  8. Number of Census Poverty Children 5-17

  9. Poverty & Population 5-17

  10. States that Gain or Lose Poverty Children AK NH WA VT ME MT ND MA MN OR WI NY ID SD RI MI WY CT PA NJ IA NE OH DE IN NV IL UT WV VA MD CO CA KS MO KY DC NC TN OK SC AZ AR NM GA AL MS LA TX HI FL Gainers (30) Losers (22) PR

  11. Poverty Rate by State NH AK WA VT ME MT ND MA MN OR WI NY ID SD RI MI WY CT PA NJ IA NE OH DE IN NV IL UT WV VA MD CO CA KS MO KY DC NC TN OK SC AZ AR NM GA AL MS LA TX HI FL Poverty rate < 15% Poverty rate >= 15% <= 20% Poverty rate > 20 % PR

  12. Impact of 2012 Census Data on Title I Allocations • A more important figure to examine is each State’s relative share of the total number of children from low-income families nationally. • An up or down change in the State share provided an early indication of the extent to which a State would likely have experienced an increase or decrease of Title I funds for SY 2014-2015. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  13. Changes in State Poverty Shares AK NH WA VT ME MT ND MA MN OR WI NY ID SD RI MI WY CT PA NJ IA NE OH DE IN NV IL UT WV VA MD CO CA KS MO KY DC NC TN OK SC AZ AR NM GA AL MS LA TX HI Increases (21) Decreases (31) FL PR

  14. Non-Census Data • Children in local neglected or delinquent institutions • Children in foster homes • Children in families above poverty receiving TANF assistance • Non-census children account for 3% of total count of formula children U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  15. State Per-Pupil Expenditure (SPPE) Data • Factor changes yearly and is a proxy for the cost of education in each State. • The formula adjusts each school district’s formula number to account for the State’s PPE. • SY 2014-2015 allocations used SPPE data updated to SY 2011-2012. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  16. Amount Appropriated for Title I, Part A • The SY 2014-2015 Title I, Part A Allocations are based on the amount appropriated for FY 2014. • The FY 2014 amount is approximately $14.4 billion. • This is a 4.5 percent increase over the FY 2013 amount. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  17. Hold-Harmless Guarantee • All four formulas provide for a variable hold-harmless guarantee for each LEA of 85, 90, and 95% of their previous year’s allocation. • The hold-harmless percentage depends on the formula child rate of each LEA. • For the Basic, Targeted, and EFIG formulas, an LEA must meet the eligibility criteria in order for the hold-harmless protection to apply. • For Concentration Grants, the hold-harmless provision applies to an LEA for four years even if it no longer meets the eligibility criteria. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  18. State Minimum • Each formula provides additional funds to certain States than would otherwise be generated by LEAs in those States alone. • The State minimum is based on a combination of (1) a percentage of the total appropriated under each formula and (2) the national average per-pupil payment and the number of formula children in each State. U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  19. FY 2014 Amount Appropriated for Other SASA Formula Programs • English Acquisition State Grants (Title III): $723,400,000 ($667,762,000 to SEAs) • States Assessment Grants: $378,000,000 ($365,360,966 to SEAs) • Homeless Education: $65,042,000 ($63,282,957 to SEAs) • Neglected or Delinquent State Agency Program: $47,614,000 ($46,423,650 to SEAs) U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  20. Resources • SASA Formula Program State Allocations: http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/statetables/index.html • Title I, Part A LEA Allocations: http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/titlei/fy14/index.html U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  21. Questions? U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

  22. Todd Stephenson Management and Program Analyst, Student Achievement and School Accountability (SASA) U.S. Department of Education Todd.Stephenson@ed.gov U. S. Department of Education ~ NASTID Summer Conference 2014

More Related