1 / 6

Some Comments on Rint

Some Comments on Rint. For a good crystal Rint is < 10% For even a bad crystal Rint<20% For a good crystal the % of data removed is <1.5% For a bad crystal <8%. Very Large Values. Sometime get very large values for both Rint and % removed.

xannon
Télécharger la présentation

Some Comments on Rint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Some Comments on Rint • For a good crystal Rint is < 10% • For even a bad crystal Rint<20% • For a good crystal the % of data removed is <1.5% • For a bad crystal <8%

  2. Very Large Values • Sometime get very large values for both Rint and % removed. • This always means you are in the wrong crystal class • Example monoclinic with beta = 90 • Tetragonal that is orthorhombic

  3. Data Reduction • The data measured is inensity • It needs to be converted to Fobs or Fobs2 • There are two corrections. • Polarization –because x-ray beam is not polarized and diffraction is not in plane of polarization =(1+cos22q)/2 • Lorenz Factor is a function of the instrument type and setup • |F|=(I/Lp)1/2

  4. Look at EVAL

  5. What have we done so far? • Found and mounted a crystal • Checked its quality • Determined the unit cell • Collect a set of frame data • Integrated the frames • Scaled the frames—combined equivalent reflections • Reduced the data • Formatted the data

  6. What is next for the data • Correct for absorption if needed • Integrated absorption correction • Empirical absorption correction • A “fudge” correction later • If we are going to do a correction a file containing direction cosines on unaveraged data is required • Correct for decay if needed

More Related