1 / 29

To Inhale or Not to Inhale?

To Inhale or Not to Inhale?. Sukhjinder Sidhu Interior Health Pharmacy Resident September 13, 2013. Learning Objectives. Describe the pathophysiology of COPD Become familiar with the clinical presentation and how to access severity of COPD

xanti
Télécharger la présentation

To Inhale or Not to Inhale?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. To Inhale or Not to Inhale? Sukhjinder Sidhu Interior Health Pharmacy Resident September 13, 2013

  2. Learning Objectives • Describe the pathophysiology of COPD • Become familiar with the clinical presentation and how to access severity of COPD • Be able to explain the evidence for treatment of mild COPD • Describe the role of ICS, LABA in management of COPD

  3. Our Patient

  4. Our Patient

  5. Review of Systems

  6. Investigations

  7. Course in Hospital • Assessed by respirology • Diagnosed with pulmonary emboli • Diagnosed with COPD

  8. Current Problems & Medications

  9. DRPs • GB is at risk of experiencing subsequent VTE’s or death secondary to non-adherence to his warfarin therapy and would benefit from reassessment of therapy. • GB is at risk of C. difficile treatment failure secondary to receiving a short duration of vancomycin therapy and would benefit from a 10 day duration. • GB is at risk of experiencing adverse events secondary to receiving COPD therapy without a clear diagnosis and unclear severity and would benefit from reassessment of his COPD therapy. • GB is at risk of developing pneumonia secondary to not receiving his pneumococcal vaccine and would benefit from a one-time administration of the vaccine.

  10. DRP Focus • GB is at risk of experiencing adverse events secondary to receiving COPD therapy without a clear diagnosis and unclear severity and would benefit from reassessment of his COPD therapy.

  11. COPD • Gradual & progressive loss of lung function due to chronic inflammatory changes • Chronic airflow limitation • alveoli lose elasticity • alveolar destruction • ↑ mucus production • Airway closure on expiration, leading to air trapping & hyperinflation nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/copd/

  12. COPD • Risk Factors • Cigarette smoking • Air pollution • Exposure to occupational dusts & chemicals • Clinical Presentation • Chronic cough • Sputum production • Dyspnea • ↑RR • Breathing with pursued lips • Hyperinflation of the lungs Can Respir J 2008;15(Suppl A):1A-8A

  13. COPD • Our patient • COPD stage = mild • Hyperinflation present • Ø PFTs • Ø SOB • Ø exacerbations • Ø chronic cough • Ø sputum production • PTA Ø puffers

  14. Goals of Therapy • Reduce mortality • Prevent or reduce hospitalizations • Reduce frequency & severity of exacerbations • Prevent disease progression • Improve QOL by reducing impairment & disability • Reduce adverse events

  15. Therapeutic Approach Can Respir J 2008;15(Suppl A):1A-8A

  16. Clinical Question • In a patient with at most mild COPD will an inhaled corticosteroid with an anticholinergic compared to a prn short-acting beta agonist reduce mortality and exacerbations, and improve quality of life and symptoms without increasing the risk of adverse events?

  17. Literature Search

  18. TRISTAN Lancet 2003; 361:449-56.

  19. TRISTAN * SS vs. placebo + SS vs. combination Lancet 2003; 361:449-56.

  20. TRISTAN • Limitations • Methodological • How many pts taking anticholinergics? • No adherence verification • Clinical • Primary outcome (FEV1) was a surrogate marker • Improvement in SGRQ not clinically significant • High drop-out rates • Pt has no subjective/objective data for having moderate-severe COPD • Pt would not fit criteria to be enrolled in study Lancet 2003; 361:449-56.

  21. TORCH N Engl J Med 2007; 356:775-89.

  22. TORCH * SS vs. placebo + SS vs. combination N Engl J Med 2007; 356:775-89.

  23. TORCH • Limitations • Methodology • Sponsor employee performed statistical analysis • Underpowered for mortality outcome • Clinical • High drop out rates • Exacerbations: benefit from fluticasone or combo, must have 5 or 4 exacerbations/yr, respectively – not clinically significant • Improvement in SGRQ not clinically significant • Pt has no subjective/objective data for having moderate-severe COPD • Pt would not fit criteria to be enrolled in study N Engl J Med 2007; 356:775-89.

  24. Summary of Evidence

  25. Alternatives for Symptom Management • Short-acting beta agonist • Salbutamol • Anticholinergics • Ipratropium • Tiotropium • Long-acting beta-agonist • Salmeterol • Formeterol • Inhaled corticosteroids

  26. Application to GB

  27. Therapeutic Plan • Discontinue fluticasone 500 mcg INH BID • Discontinue ipratropium 40 mcg INH QID • Discontinue salbutamol 200 mcg INH Q1H PRN • Initiate salbutamol 200 mcg INH Q4H PRN • Recommended one-time pneumococcal vaccine when stabilized

  28. Monitoring Plan

  29. Follow Up • All COPD inhaler recommendations were accepted by MTU team • Vancomycin increased to 10 days duration • Applied for SA for rivaroxaban for treatment of PE • Counseled patient on warfarin • Counseled patient on proper inhaler use • Recommended PFTs once stabilized

More Related