1 / 3

Analyzing Recent News Coverage of Environmental Issues: A Critical Reflection

This piece invites readers to engage with a recent environmental news article or broadcast, encouraging a thoughtful review of the coverage. It prompts reflections on both sides of the issue presented, the emotional impact of imagery and language used, and the credibility of the facts provided. Readers are encouraged to note their emotional reactions, identify expert opinions, and consider any gaps in the reporting that could influence public perception. Ultimately, the activity fosters a deeper understanding of environmental journalism and its implications.

xena
Télécharger la présentation

Analyzing Recent News Coverage of Environmental Issues: A Critical Reflection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Field Activity Find a news article or watch a news broadcast about a recent environmental issue. In your Journal write down your initial reaction including your thoughts, feelings, and questions

  2. Field Activity • Look at the following questions: • Did the report present both sides of the issue? Describe both of the sides? • Did the report seem to favor one side or the other? How could you tell? • Did the report use images, sounds, or words that made you feel a certain way? • Did the report provide any facts that helped you form an opinion? Try to list the facts.

  3. Field Activity • Were sources of the facts provided? Did the sources seem reliable? • Were the opinions of any expert scientists presented? Who were the scientists? • Is there any information that was not provided that might be important? Give examples. • When you think about the issues more, does your opinion change?

More Related