1 / 17

Presentation at the VI Meeting of the Natural Disasters Network

The Poor Suffer the Most: Dual Challenge of Poverty and Disaster Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean. Kari Keipi, Senior Specialist, IDB. Presentation at the VI Meeting of the Natural Disasters Network Joint Session with the Poverty Network, April 25 th 2005

xena
Télécharger la présentation

Presentation at the VI Meeting of the Natural Disasters Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Poor Suffer the Most: Dual Challenge of Poverty and Disaster Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean Kari Keipi, Senior Specialist, IDB Presentation at the VI Meeting of the Natural Disasters Network Joint Session with the Poverty Network, April 25th 2005 IDB Headquarters, Washington D.C.

  2. Poverty and Disasters • People in low-income countries are four times as likely to die in a natural disaster as people in high-income countries • The poor are more vulnerable to natural hazards because poor people tend to: • have less savings and lack financial flexibility (impedes investing in disaster prevention and financing of disaster recovery) • live on marginal lands (urban and rural) • lack land titles (no incentives to invest in mitigating) • have no means to built safe infrastructure • not be warned of impeding disasters • lack means of evacuation (when warned)

  3. Diagnosis: Risk Profile for the Region • Average of 40 important disasters annually in the region. • 4 million people affected • 5,000 deaths • US$3.2 billion in direct losses and an estimated similar or larger amount of indirect losses.

  4. GNP and Disasters FEN FEN Terremoto

  5. Life and death effects of disasters

  6. Development trends and future disasters • “Losses per event will rise in the future, particularly in rapidly growing urban areas, unless systematic efforts are made to reduce vulnerability.” Jeffrey Sachs (2006), Investing in Development: A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, p. 179. • “...poverty and population pressure force growing numbers of poor people to live in harm’s way—on flood plains, in earthquake-prone zones and on unstable hillsides.” UN Secretary General Kofi Annan (2004).

  7. The Cycle of Vulnerability MACRO-LEVEL VULNERABILITY NATURAL HAZARD

  8. AGRAVATING FACTORS OF VULNERABILITY Inadequate capacity for risk management More vulnerable constructions and productive activities Population and productive activities over- exposed to hazards Natural resources and environmental deterioration Population incapable of assessing its vulnerability and confronting emergencies Poor construction quality Weak risk management institutions Inadequate management of natural resources Random urban growth Inadequate territorial management Reactive and centralist disaster attention paradigms still prevail Obsolete risk management legislation Inadequate development model Decision makers lack awareness and willingness Underestimation of hazards

  9. Sustainable poverty reduction must address disaster risk • Land use planning (know risk, avoid settlements in hazard prone areas, provide alternatives) • Construct to reasonable standards (raise awareness, build in accordance with the hazard environment) • Increase savings opportunities • Establish viable contingency plans at community level • Consider (small) business continuity needs

  10. Sustainable poverty reduction must address practices to decrease vulnerability • Hillside farming, slash and burn techniques in rural areas which remove soil cover could cause mudslides and flooding from heavy rains • Clogging of urban drainage or natural run-off leads to flooding.

  11. The Indicators Program • Indicators have on a pilot basis been developed for 12 countries. • Consists of four major measures (comprised of composite indicators) • The Disaster Deficit Index (DDI) • The Local Disaster Index (LDI) • The Prevalent Vulnerability Index (PVI) • The Risk Management Index (RMI)

  12. PVI • The Prevalent Vulnerability Index is made up of a series of indicators that characterize prevalent vulnerability conditions reflected in exposure in prone areas, socioeconomic weaknesses and lack of social resilience in general. • Indicators of Exposure and Susceptibility (PVIes) • Indicators of Socioeconomic Fragility(PVIsf) • Indicators of (Lack of) Resilience (PVIlr)

  13. PVI for Selected IDBMember Countries

  14. IDB Financial Instruments BEFORE EMERGENCY AFTER Disaster Prevention Facility: $5 million Immediate Emergency Response Facilty: $20 million Reconstruction Operations with risk reduction components or activities Re-orientaction of loans under execution Re-orientation of loans under execution Bank Instruments Disaster Prevention Fund Emergency Technical Cooperation to the Country Offices’ discretion: $200,000 Technical Cooperations Technical Cooperations

  15. The IDB Disaster Prevention Fund • This fund has been created by the Bank to facilitate investments by countries in disaster prevention • Fund to finance individual non-reimbursable operations, including studies concerning the preparation and design of prevention projects and components of loans in high-risk areas and sectors. • Each individual grant is capped at US$ 1 million. • The fund can be used to finance strategic interventions to improve disaster prevention at local, national and regional level.

  16. Meeting the dual challenge • People’s vulnerability to natural hazards has a strong influence on poverty in its multiple dimensions, and vice versa. • Poverty reduction strategies must address the risk to natural hazards and integrate vulnerability reduction. • Action is needed now. Current demographic trends (with uncontrolled urban settlement) will lead to much increased vulnerability in the future, unless systematic efforts are made to reduce vulnerability. • Collaboration is needed between urban and rural planners, civil defense, and professionals responsible for social services and investments.

More Related