1 / 20

Paratransit, Inc. Cancellation Policies, Practices & Results

Paratransit, Inc. Cancellation Policies, Practices & Results. Characteristics of Cancel Types. Timely cancels make up more than 2/3 of all cancels, and typically are only effected by changing the length of the call-in period

xia
Télécharger la présentation

Paratransit, Inc. Cancellation Policies, Practices & Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Paratransit, Inc.Cancellation Policies, Practices & Results

  2. Characteristics of Cancel Types • Timely cancels make up more than 2/3 of all cancels, and typically are only effected by changing the length of the call-in period • Though the smallest component of the cancellation rate, No shows are the most destructive in terms of the devastating effect on productivity

  3. Definitions and Methodology • Timely Cancel: Notice was provided at least 2 hours before the scheduled trip • Late Cancel: Notice was less than 2 hours before the scheduled trip • No show: No notice is provided before driver arrives within pick-up window and after 5 minute wait

  4. Due Process and Facilitation • Passenger’s explanation for not providing notice is documented in Trapeze • Trapeze record reflects instances when lack of notification is not within control of passenger • Automated Telephone System reminders on night before ride and when bus is near • No rider is suspended without written notice documenting pattern and opportunity to meet

  5. Excessive Missed Trips Trip frequency is considered • A pattern or practice is when a passenger reserves seven or more trips within any month and no-shows or late cancels forty percent or more of those scheduled trips

  6. Rider’s Responsibilities • Later rides for the day will not automatically be cancelled unless notice is provided • A bus will not be sent back when passenger No Shows on outbound trip • If outbound trip is taken, but inbound is a No Showed, passenger won’t be stranded

  7. Sanction for Violations Applies to rolling 12 month period • 1st suspension: two-month period • 2nd suspension: four-month period • 3rd suspension: six-month period • 4th suspension: two-year period • Subscribers may reapply four months after end of suspension period

  8. Right to Appeal • Written and/or in-person appeals are optional • Additional written statement and/or supporting documentation is always considered • How to file an appeal with timelines is provided at time of sanction notice • In-person appeal hearings are held no later than 21 calendar days after sanction notice

  9. Appeal Decision • Suspension takes place after independent appeals panel makes determination • Written decision will include beginning and ending dates of the suspension period • The appeals panel decision is final

  10. Why is this Policy Important? • Unused capacity can be re-used with timely notice • Productivity declines when No Show and Late Notice capacity cannot be re-used • Money, time, and miles are wasted • Customer service quality declines

  11. Trend Analysis 25-month period ending February 2011 • Simple linear regression • Trips Scheduled • Trips Cancelled Timely • Late Cancellations • No Shows

  12. Overall Demand Fell Trips Scheduled February 2009 – February 2011 Trips down about 19%, or 7,500

  13. Absolute Timely Cancels Fell February 2009– February 2011 • Mimicked the downward trend in demand • Absolute number of cancels fell by about 20%

  14. Percentage of Timely Cancels February 2009 – February 2011 While the absolute number fell, the rate as a percentage of total cancels increased

  15. Absolute Late Cancels February 2009 – February 2011 Significantly, the absolute number of late cancels fell by about 45%

  16. Percentage of Late Cancels February 2009– February 2011 The rate of late cancels has fallen by 21%

  17. Absolute No Shows February 2009 – February 2011 The absolute number of No Shows fell by 47%.

  18. Percentage of No Shows The rate of No Shows decreased by 22%.

  19. Helpful Tips • Establish a policy that is fair and equitable • Aim policy and practices at reducing No Shows and Late Cancels • Use technology if you have it • Maintain consistent documentation to support application of your policy • Follow-up after each instance of potential passenger non compliance • Focus on changing behavior, rather than imposing sanctions

  20. Results • By sharply reducing the Late Cancel and No Show rates we were able to reduce the total cancellation rate and increase productivity by around 10% • Since inception of the policy, fewer than 10 passengers have been suspended • No passenger has met the second level criteria of the progressive schedule • Revision of the frequency rate for establishing a pattern or practice for excessive missed trips is under consideration

More Related