Download
1 / 12
120 likes | 242 Vues
This document provides an overview of the revised Promotion and Tenure (P&T) procedures for ED Studies, focusing on enhancing teacher effectiveness, scholarship, and service evaluation. Key changes include emphasized scoring rubrics, peer evaluations, and expanded documentation requirements. Each area of evaluation—teacher effectiveness (70%), scholarship (20%), and service (10%)—is detailed with target scores of 100 across categories. The document outlines recommendations for presenting evidence, including suggested practices for color-coding and labeling materials to assist the P&T Committee in understanding the submitted portfolio.
E N D
ED Studies P & T Review & Modifications of Procedures
ED Studies P & T Procedures PTPI Target Score of 100 Service Scholarship Teacher Effectiveness
Overview • Teacher Effectiveness (approximately 70%) • Peer Evaluation • Face-to-Face Instruction • Online Course Instruction • Teaching Materials • Student Evaluation • Self-Evaluation • Interview by P&T Committee • Additional Evidence
Overview • Scholarship (approximately 20%) • Priority I • Priority II • Priority III • Priority IV • Service (approximately 10%) • Standard of performance increasesmoving from Associate Professor to Tenure to Full Professor. • Target Score for all three is 100.
Scholarship & Service • Scholarship and Service credit can be estimated by using the PTPI Spreadsheet. • PTPI Spreadsheet • See documents W and X on the CD that you received last Fall.
Teacher Effectiveness • Each of the six subscores is scored with a rubric describing how the evidence supplied by the candidate will be evaluated. • Teaching Materials Rubric • Suggestions for scoring the rubric are provided for each rubric. • For Teaching Materials it is Document I on the CD.
Most Important Change • How can you help the P&T Committee better understand the evidence supplied in the portfolio? • Submission of Materials as per the Faculty Handbook will continue. • BUT expanded documentation with respect to the ED Studies P&T procedures must be undertaken to guarantee the validity of your evidence.
Example • Teaching Materials Rubric has five sub-categories: TM-1, TM-2, TM-3, TM-4, TM-5. • The P&T Committee must assign a score for each of these. • If they can’t find the evidence in your portfolio that addresses that sub-category, the rubric score will be low.
Recommendations • Make sure you provide evidence for every sub-category. • Follow the suggestions that the P&T Committee will be using to evaluate each sub-category. Document I . • Label each piece of evidence. Use a color-coding system. (Example: Dr. Hewitt’s promotion materials)
Recommendations • The same strategy could be used in artifacts submitted in the scholarship category. • A reprint of an article published in a national journal (I-S4) should be labeled so the P&T Committee knows at what level of scholarship you think the artifact represents. • A different color code could be used for II-S4 or III-S2, etc.
Another Important Change • The Peer Review Rubric requires visits by your peers to “observe” your instruction. • Face-to-face (Document B) • Online Instruction (Document C) • Arrangements must be made for the “peer observations” (especially if they involve observations made by “peers” from off-campus) to be made during the Fall semester (ASAP).
Minor Modifications • There are some other minor modifications that may need to take place between now and the next round of promotion and tenure deliberations early next semester. • The ED Studies P&T procedures are ever evolving, and your suggestions are always welcome.
