1 / 15

Resonance production in heavy-ion collisions at STAR

Resonance production in heavy-ion collisions at STAR. Christina Markert University of Texas at Austin. Motivation Resonances Hadronic phase (system size/energy) Chiral symmetry restoration (jets) Conclusion. T chemical. T chemical.

xue
Télécharger la présentation

Resonance production in heavy-ion collisions at STAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resonance production in heavy-ion collisions at STAR Christina Markert University of Texas at Austin • Motivation • Resonances • Hadronic phase (system size/energy) • Chiral symmetry restoration (jets) • Conclusion Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  2. Tchemical Tchemical Lifetime of nuclear medium 200 GeV Au+Au Dt ~ 3-5 fm/c resonances t ~ 10 fm/c 2 particle correlation Partonic phase  ~ 5-7 fm/c Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 132301 Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  3. hadronic decay K f signal measured late decay p K p L* K re-scattering signal lost p kinetic freeze-out L* p chemical freeze-out signal measured K K regeneration e+ signal measured early decay f e- leptonic decay time Hadronic re-scattering and regeneration Life-time [fm/c] : K(892) = 4.0 S(1385) = 5.7 L(1520) = 13  (1020) = 45 • Depends on: • hadronic phase density • hadronic phase lifetime Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  4. System size and energy dependence increasing centrality larger system size Au 197 smaller nucleus  Smaller system size compare to number of produced charged particles dN/dy Cu 64 lower energy 200 GeV 62 GeV Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  5. STAR Preliminary STAR preliminary Suppression scales with dNch/dy ~ system size A Lordanova SQM2007 Resonance suppression (system size dependence) [1] P. Braun-Munzinger et.al.,PLB 518(2001) 41, priv. communication [2] Marcus Bleicher and Jörg Aichelin Phys. Lett. B530 (2002) 81. M. Bleicher and Horst Stöcker J. Phys.G30 (2004) 111. Life-time [fm/c] : K(892) = 4.0 S(1385) = 5.7 L(1520) = 13  (1020) = 45 [1] [2] Regeneration/Rescattering cross section: s(K+p) <s (K+p) < s (L+p) ? L* K* S* Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 132301 Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 064902 See S. Dash SQM2007 statistical errors only ! Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  6. M. Bleicher et al. STAR preliminary STAR preliminary Resonance suppression (energy dependence) Life-time [fm/c] K(892) = 4.0  (1020) = 45 Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 064902 nucl-ex/0703033 See S. Dash SQM2007 statistical errors only ! • Less re-scattering at lower energies in peripheral collisions • Same volume but, • Lower density  smaller interactions cross section? • Shorter hadronic lifetime  less hadronic interactions ? Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  7. Regeneration might increase elliptic flow minbias 200 GeV Au+Au Recombination model C. Nonaka, et al., Phys.Rev.C69: 031902,2004 Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 064902 Partonic resonance generation: Number of Constituent Quark (NCQ) scaling at intermediate pT (meson NCQ = 2) Hadronic resonance (re)generation: Regenerated resonances–final state interactions NCQ = 4 (K* = K +p =2+2) Data suggest small regeneration for K* (need smaller errors !) Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  8. Resonance in a medium (nuclear matter) Mass shift and width broadenings are predicted as influence of medium on resonance spectral function, e.g.: For baryonic and strange resonances M.F.M Lutz (SQM 2001) J.Phys.G28:1729-1736,2002 M.F.M Lutz, E.E. Kolomeitsev, Nucl.Phys.A755:29-39,2005. hep-ph/0501224 For mesonic resonances Ralf Rapp (Texas A&M) J.Phys. G31 (2005) S217-S230 L(1520) andS(1385) resonances decay channel change M. Kaskulov et al., nucl-th/0509088 Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  9. away near STAR Preliminary Resonances from jets arXiv:nucl-ex/0706.0724 near-side Df = 0 Df = p Df = p/2 Study Chiral Symmetry Restoration by comparing resonance production in event classes based on azimuthal distribution: We expect high pT resonances from the away side jet to be medium modified due to the high density and temperature of the partonic and pre-equilibrium hadronic medium Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  10. side 1 near away side 2 Formation of hadronic resonances (from jets) in a chiral medium Formation time arguments: a.) General pQCD: Formation time [fm/c] ~ pT [GeV] Formation time [fm/c] ~ 1/mass b.) Specific string fragmentation (PYTHIA) formalism: Gallmeister, Falter, PLB630, 40 (2005) Intermediate pT resonances form early c.) Vitev et al. (hep-ph/0611109): High pT heavy particles and resonances form early Need to determine the right momenta for trigger and resonance particle Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  11. First attempt: f(1020) reconstruction from jets 200 GeV Au+Au charged hadrons Trigger/Event M inv (K+ K-) Number of triggers f(1020) ~95% of events have on trigger particle • Trigger particle: • hadron pT > 4.0 GeV • Associated particle: • resonance f(1020) • <pT>~ 0.9 GeV M inv (K+ K-) Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  12. side1 near away side2 f(1020) from same/away side in/out of plane side1 near - side 51385±2369 61043±2394 Systematic errors are ~ 10% away- side side2 No mass shift or width broadening visible Yield away/same 1.26±0.19 64498±2400 54893±2378 Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  13. Hadron - resonance correlation in Au+Au Df of h-f(1020) – C • h-f(1020) mixed event Hadron trigger pT > 4 GeV f(1020) <pT > ~ 0.9 GeV ( need higher pt ) Not corrected for acceptance Systematic BG normalization error not included STAR preliminary ZYAM = zero yield at minimum Pythia 75M events p+p 200 GeV only phi (no background from K+K combinations) Not corrected for v2 Pythia p+p QM2006 M.Horner Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  14. |1/β-1|<0.03 Time of Flight upgrade detector TOF STAR Experiment • STAR: Time of Flight detector upgrade: • PID at higher momentum • Electron hadron separation • Installation completed in 2-3 years J.WU QM2006 Improves reconstruction of hadronic and leptonic decay channels: K* K+p, Dp+p, L*K+p f K+K, e++e- Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

  15. Conclusions • Low momentum resonances provide information regarding the lifetime of hadronic stage. • Re-scattering cross section scales with system size. • Lower collision energy results in less hadronic interactions. • High momentum resonances from jets could be used as a tool to trigger on early produced resonances and test chiral symmetry restoration • Need more quantitative theoretical description of formation time of hadronic resonances as a function of mass, momentum and medium density. • First step: Untriggered f(1020) correlation spectrum shows no evidence of medium modification • Next steps: • Trigger on high p Tf(1020) • Reconstruct resonances in jets with shorter lifetime as f(1020) but sufficient statistics (e.g. K*, D). • New TOF detector will help to study higher pT resonance and leptonic decays. Christina MarkertSQM2007, June 2007, Levoča, Slovakia

More Related