1 / 13

Clinical algorithm for the active mobilization of a patient that can follow commands

Clinical algorithm for the active mobilization of a patient that can follow commands. Next step in the algorithm. ON ADMISSION TO UNIT. Develop an individually designed mobility plan with outcomes for each patient in consultation with rest of the team. Monitor daily and provide feedback

yaakov
Télécharger la présentation

Clinical algorithm for the active mobilization of a patient that can follow commands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical algorithm for the active mobilization of a patient that can follow commands Next step in the algorithm

  2. ON ADMISSION TO UNIT • Develop an individually designed mobility plan with outcomes for each patient in consultation with rest of the team. • Monitor daily and provide feedback (Nava 2000; Nava 2002; Thomas 2002; Vollman 2004) RECOMMENDATION 2 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  3. PRELIMINARY SCREENING Factors to consider before initiation of active mobilization • Neurological contra indications? • Orthopedic contra indications? • Recent SSG? Environmental factors to consider • Patient size and help available • Length and placement of lines / attachments • Patient consent Stiller et al 2004; Bailey 2007 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  4. DURING ALL ACTIVITIES MONITOR CLOSELY • HR to maximum of 75% of APM • Dispnea rating of 13 on MBS • SpO2 >90 • Arythmias on ECG • Patient physical appearance: conscious state, respiratory pattern, pallor, flushing, sweating, clamminess, cyanosis, visible or patient reported signs of pain, discomfort or fatigue. Stiller et al 2004; Baily et al 2007 RECOMMENDATION 1 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  5. DECIDE ON ACTIVITY LEVELBASED ON PERIOD OF INTUBATION GROUP 1 • Is not intubated or has been intubated less than 14 days Stiller et al 2004; Bailey 2007 RECOMMENDATION 1 GROUP 2 • Has been intubated more than 14 days Nava et al 1998; Zanotti et al 2002; Martin et al 2005; Porta et al 2005; Chiang et al 2006 RECOMMENDATION 3 Previous step in the algorithm

  6. GROUP 1: Determine cardiovascular reserve • Resting heart rate < 50% APM • BP less than 20%variability • ECG normal (arithmias) • Mayor cardiac pathologies excluded Stiller et al 2004 • Absence of orthostatic hypotension • and catecholamine drips Baily et al 2007 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  7. GROUP 1: Determine pulmonary reserve • PaO2:FiO2>300 • SpO2>90 variations less than 4% • Satisfactory respiratory pattern • Able to maintain adequate respiratory support Stiller et al 2004 • FiO2 <.6 • PEEP<10 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  8. GROUP 1: Other factors favorable • HB >7gm/dl • Platelet 20,000 cells/m3 • White cell 4300 – 10800 cells/m3 • Body temp <38 >36 • Blood glucose level 3.5-20mmol/L Stiller et al 2004 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  9. GROUP 1: If unsure of any of these criteria discuss with the interdisciplinary team members If reserve is sufficient initiate mobilization program Previous step in the algorithm

  10. GROUP 2: Determine pulmonary stability • Airway: Tracheostomy for invasive ventilation. • Minimal aspiration • Secretions: manageable with infrequent suctioning • Oxygen: adequate oxygenation with FIO2 <50%, • PEEP <5 cm H2O, SpO2 >92% • Ventilator settings: stable, no sophisticated modes • Patient assessment: comfortable, no increased WOB or dyspnea Martin et al 2005; Porta et al 2005 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  11. GROUP 2:Determine medical stability • Sepsis controlled • No uncontrolled hemorrhage • No uncontrolled arrhythmias, heart failure, or unstable angina • Secure parenteral line Martin et al 2005; Porta et al 2005 Next step in the algorithm Previous step in the algorithm

  12. GROUP 1:Initiate Mobilization Program • Mobilization activities include moving from • Lying to sitting on the edge of the bed; • sitting to standing; • a standing transfer from the edge of the bed to a chair; walking with assistance; • walking independently.(Stiller et al 2004; Baily et al 2007) • Progress the activities with goal of walking 100m before discharge(Baily et al 2007) • Temporarily adjust FiO2 if patient desaturates(Stiller et al 2004; Baily et al 2007) • If patient is unable to mobilize out of bed include arm exercises (both strengthening and endurance) into a mobility regime is safe and could potentially facilitate weaning(Porta et al 2005; Vittaca et al 2006) Back to Group allocation

  13. GROUP 2: Initiate Combined Mobilization AND Exercise Program • In addition to daily mobilization program initiate specific exercise program (de Jonge et al 2007; Greenleef et al 1997; Nava et al 1998); • Program should include both strengthening and endurance component (Porta et al 2005; Vittaca et al 2006; Zanotti et al 2002) • Incorporate trunk and arms (Pectoralis Mayor) Chiang et al 2006; Martin et al 2005; van de Meet et al 2007 • Exercise at intensity of at least 11 on Borg scale progressing to 13 by week 6 (Chiang et al 2006; Martin et al 2005) • Duration of session at least 30 minutes progress to 45 minutes daily (Chiang et al 2006; Martin et al 2005) • Temporarily adjust FiO2 if patient desaturates (Stiller et al 2004; Baily et al 2007) Back to Group allocation

More Related