1 / 13

Evaluating Journal Collections to Meet Faculty Needs: A Case Study at University of Guelph

Discover how University of Guelph assessed its journal collections' relevance to faculty research and teaching needs, including methodology, results, and potential improvements.

yakov
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Journal Collections to Meet Faculty Needs: A Case Study at University of Guelph

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beyond use statistics: Journal collections that meet faculty needs Linda Day and Alan Gale Information Resources & Collections Unit University of Guelph Library

  2. Why evaluate journal collections? • Journals are fundamentally important to faculty both for research and teaching. • University libraries spend a substantial part of their acquisitions budget on journals • Universities are accountable for the quality of their expenditure decisions

  3. University of Guelph • 17,600 FTE undergraduates, 2300 FTE graduate students, ca. 850 faculty (current) • Information resources budget: $6,124,351 (2006/2007) • Journal spend: $3,471,502 (2006/2007) • Participant in OCUL and CRKN deals • ca. 34,000 journals available (this includes titles in aggregated databases and therefore duplicates of some titles) (2006/2007)

  4. Study methodology • Used Journal Citation Reports (JCR) database from Thomson Reuters • Established lists of most frequently cited journals in Chemistry, Engineering, Math & Stats, and Physics • Exported data to Excel • Determined Guelph access: online, print, etc. • Created the necessary charts and tables

  5. Summary data for chemistry journals

  6. Backfile data for Chemistry journals

  7. Discussion / Conclusions • Guelph has ‘good’ coverage of the journal literature in the subject areas reviewed • Analytical approach is simple. • Results can be portrayed clearly. • Possible improvements to the data analysis process. • Faculty (dis)satisfaction with our journal collection (access) from LibQual 2007

  8. We welcome questions and comments!Alan Galeagale@uoguelph.caLinda Daylday@uoguelph.ca

More Related