270 likes | 369 Vues
Health Reform: A California Perspective. Insure the Uninsured Project ( www.itup.org ) September 3, 2009 Kaiser Family Foundation Washington, DC. The Uninsured in California Surveys. CHIS vs. CPS CHIS is a California specific survey of health insurance and health status.
E N D
Health Reform: A California Perspective Insure the Uninsured Project (www.itup.org) September 3, 2009 Kaiser Family Foundation Washington, DC
The Uninsured in CaliforniaSurveys • CHIS vs. CPS • CHIS is a California specific survey of health insurance and health status. • According to CHIS (2007), about 5 million Californians are uninsured at a point in time and 6.5 million over the course of the year. • CPS is a national survey; a point in time response • The 2008 report found nearly 6.7 million Californians are uninsured over the course of the year. • The high unemployment due to the recession has increased this figure to over 7 million.
The Uninsured in CaliforniaPopulations • 7 million uninsured (7th highest by percentage) • 55% between 18 and 40 years old • Young adults have highest uninsured rate at 25% • 61% have incomes under 200% FPL • 25% have incomes over 300% FPL • 85% are working or the spouses/children of workers • 15% are legal permanent residents • 64% are US citizens
The Uninsured in CaliforniaVariation by County *Residents under 65 with no health insurance at some point in 2006 Source: P. Reese, Interactive Map: Counties with the Most Uninsured, The Sacramento Bee, Aug. 16, 2009
The Uninsured in CaliforniaVariation by Region • Regional variation in uninsured rate • Much poorer access to care • 49% report no usual source of care, compared to 6% of privately insured and 12% of publicly insured
Private Coverage in California • 60% of Californians privately insured • Employer coverage • 70% of businesses offer coverage (63% nationally) • 3-9 employees: 60% offer coverage • 10-50 employees: 83% offer coverage • 27% of lower wage firms offer coverage • Rate of coverage shrunk by 4% from 2002-2008 due to high premium increases • Individual coverage • 2 million buy through individual market • Prices rising sharply and extent of coverage shrinking
Public Coverage in CaliforniaMedi-Cal • Covers 6.8 million in 2009 • $40B in spending • $2,740 per beneficiary in FY 2006 (2nd lowest in nation) CA recently discontinued these services to adults: dental, vision, podiatric, hearing
Public Coverage in CaliforniaHealthy Families/AIM • Covers 925,000 children • Over 70,000 on wait list and growing, with coverage terminations scheduled for November • $1.2B in spending • Subscribers choose among competing public and private plans
Medically Indigent Adults (MIAs) • MIAs: adults not otherwise eligible for Medi-Cal • 1.5 million persons under 200% FPL • Medi-Cal coverage discontinued in 1982-3 • Counties are responsible for care • $1.8B in spending • $367 per uninsured person, compared to $4,900 average employment based coverage premium
California’s Flex Workforce • Temporary, seasonal, part-time, self-employed micro-businesses and contract workers (estimated 16% of workforce) • Child care, agriculture, real estate, construction, service industries • High rates of uninsured • 12% receive coverage through job • Industry wide coverage (Taft Hartley trusts, MEWAS) • Potential building blocks if financing for care to low wage workers can be accessed
Underwriting and Purchasing Pools • 1992 reform, small employers (2-5o employees) • Guaranteed issue and renewal, age rating • 4 family sizes, 9 geographical areas • HIPC/PacAdvantage – purchasing pool fell victim to adverse selection • Individual market • High rate of denials, rescissions, and other practices • MRMIP - Bad risk pool for medically uninsurable • Enrollment frozen at less than 8,000 with over 170,000 eligible
Cost Containment and HMOs • California: competitive model since 1982-83 • High HMO penetration (twice national average) • 50% of insured employees • 50% of Medi-Cal subscribers • CA changed from low priced to medium priced HMO market • Employer premiums increased 9.2% in 2008 (4.8% nationally) • Small employer premiums increased 30% more than large employers • Premiums increased 4X faster than inflation from 2002-2008 Competition resulted in lower costs in urban areas (SD, LA) but is not a viable strategy in rural and single-hospital regions
The Safety NetDelivery System (2006) • Community clinics • Average 1 visit/uninsured • Range by county from 0.2 to 3 visits/uninsured • Counties • Pay or provide: (per 1000 uninsured) • 85 inpatient days • 90 emergency room visits • 900 outpatient visits • Eligibility limits for MIAs range from 63% to 500% FPL
Uncompensated Care (2006) • Hospitals • $1.7B in bad debt/charity care to uninsured in 2006 (3.3% of expenses) • $2B in uncompensated care to Medi-Cal patients • Net operating losses of $2B (almost 4% of revenue) in 2006
Uncompensated Care (2006) • Clinics • $231M in uncompensated care to uninsured (12% of expenses) in 2006 • DSH and supplemental payments • Public hospitals receive $1B in DSH, $578M in Safety Net Care Pool funds • Private hospitals receive $669M to offset uncompensated care
Local Pilots • 10 counties using different designs targeted to most urgent local needs • $180M in competitive federal allocations • Children’s Health Initiatives (CHIs) for uninsured children
Proposed Bi-Partisan ReformABX1 1 • Individual Mandate with hardship exclusions • Employer pay or play and required offering of §125 plans • Financing: individuals, employers, government and providers • Counties and federal government to pay part of coverage match for MIAs • Hospitals to pay part of match for rate increases and coverage expansions to the uninsured • MRMIB (state purchasing pool) to set benefits level
Proposed Bi-Partisan ReformABX1 1 • Expand Medicaid to 150% FPL, CHIP to 300% FPL • Refundable tax credits on a sliding scale to 400% FPL through state purchasing pool (Exchange) • Require cost/quality transparency, P4P • Managed competition • Triggered repeal of reforms if costs exceeded revenues and the state government failed to balance the program’s deficit
For resources and additional information we are available at (310) 828-0338 info@itup.org http://www.itup.org