1 / 11

Technetium-99 in Urine

Technetium-99 in Urine. Tabitha Liebrecht & Buzz Vickery Severn Trent Laboratories Richland 2800 George Washington Way Richland, Wa 99352 (509)375-3131. Advantages of Eichrom Method (Summary). Time saving Waste reduction Yield. Method Summary (Step One - Urine Prep). Sample Pour-up

yanisin-vargas
Télécharger la présentation

Technetium-99 in Urine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Technetium-99 in Urine Tabitha Liebrecht & Buzz Vickery Severn Trent Laboratories Richland 2800 George Washington Way Richland, Wa 99352 (509)375-3131

  2. Advantages of Eichrom Method(Summary) • Time saving • Waste reduction • Yield

  3. Method Summary(Step One - Urine Prep) • Sample Pour-up • Prepare Sample

  4. Method Summary(Step Two - Separations and Counting) • Acid Digestion/Transfer • Prepare sample for TEVA disk • Filter/Separation via TEVA disc • Prepare sample for LSC

  5. Ion Exchange vs. TEVA Disc • Ion Exchange method spike yield (1999) • 300ml sample size w/ 85.04% yield • TEVA disc method spike yield (2000) • 300ml sample size w/ 95.23% yield • Yield increase • Average of 10% increase in spike recovery

  6. Ion Exchange vs. TEVA Disc (continued) • tSIE improvement @ 100% • Lum improvement @ 66.0% • New method MDA improvement @ 15% • Contractual MDA = 35 pCi/L

  7. Ion Exchange vs. TEVA Disc (continued) • Analysis time saving • 48 hours vs 12 hours • Cost Savings (11 samples/batch) • 75% savings per batch (FTE)

  8. Waste Summary • 800ml vs 350ml of acidic waste • 60% decrease in waste produced • Waste disposal savings of $0.66 per sample analyzed

  9. Conclusions • Improved TAT • Decreased waste • Increased yields • Lower MDA • Improved reliability

  10. Future Eichrom Projects • Np-237 by TEVA with ICP/MS (via Eichrom ACW08 and ACU03) • Th separation • Am/Pu/U by TRU/UTEVA (via Eichrom ACW03) • Strontium by Sr resin (via SRW01) • Tc-99 in soil • Pb-210 Single Operator Test

  11. Thanks to EichromAnil Thakkar and Larry Jassin

More Related