1 / 42

Module-3 : Transmission Lecture-5 (4/5/00)

Module-3 : Transmission Lecture-5 (4/5/00). Marc Moonen Dept. E.E./ESAT, K.U.Leuven marc.moonen@esat.kuleuven.ac.be www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/~moonen/. Prelude. Comments on lectures being too fast/technical * I assume comments are representative for (+/-)whole group

yepa
Télécharger la présentation

Module-3 : Transmission Lecture-5 (4/5/00)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module-3 : TransmissionLecture-5 (4/5/00) Marc Moonen Dept. E.E./ESAT, K.U.Leuven marc.moonen@esat.kuleuven.ac.be www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/~moonen/ Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven/ESAT-SISTA

  2. Prelude Comments on lectures being too fast/technical * I assume comments are representative for (+/-)whole group * Audience = always right, so some action needed…. To my own defense :-) * Want to give an impression/summary of what today’s transmission techniques are like (`box full of mathematics & signal processing’, see Lecture-1). Ex: GSM has channel identification (Lecture-6), Viterbi (Lecture-4),... * Try & tell the story about the maths, i.o. math. derivation. * Compare with textbooks, consult with colleagues working in transmission... Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  3. Prelude Good news * New start (I): Will summarize Lectures (1-2-)3-4. -only 6 formulas- * New start (II) : Starting point for Lectures 5-6 is 1 (simple) input-output model/formula (for Tx+channel+Rx). * Lectures 3-4-5-6 = basic dig.comms principles, from then on focus on specific systems, DMT (e.g. ADSL), CDMA (e.g. 3G mobile), ... Bad news : * Some formulas left (transmission without formulas = fraud) * Need your effort ! * Be specific about the further (math) problems you may have. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  4. Lecture-5 : Equalization Problem Statement : • Optimal receiver structure consists of * Whitened Matched Filter (WMF) front-end (= matched filter + symbol-rate sampler + `pre-cursor equalizer’ filter) * Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimator (MLSE), (instead of simple memory-less decision device) • Problem: Complexity of Viterbi Algorithm (MLSE) • Solution: Use equalization filter + memory-less decision device (instead of MLSE)... Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  5. Lecture-5: Equalization - Overview • Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Transmission of 1 symbol : Matched Filter (MF) front-end Transmission of a symbol sequence : Whitened Matched Filter (WMF) front-end & MLSE (Viterbi) • Zero-forcing Equalization Linear filters Decision feedback equalizers • MMSE Equalization • Fractionally Spaced Equalizers Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  6. Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Channel Model: Continuous-time channel =Linear filter channel + additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) ... h(t) + ? ? n(t) AWGN channel receiver (to be defined) transmitter Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  7. r(t) s(t) p(t) h(t) + ? transmit pulse n(t) AWGN channel transmitter Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Transmitter: * Constellations (linear modulation): n bits -> 1 symbol (PAM/QAM/PSK/..) * Transmit filter p(t) : ... receiver (to be defined) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  8. s(t) p(t) transmit pulse transmitter Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 p(t) Transmitter: -> piecewise constant p(t) (`sample & hold’) gives s(t) with infinite bandwidth, so not the greatest choice for p(t).. -> p(t) usually chosen as a (perfect) low-pass filter (e.g. RRC) t Example t discrete-time symbol sequence continuous-time transmit signal Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  9. 1/Ts Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver: In Lecture-3, a receiver structure was postulated (front-end filter + symbol-rate sampler + memory-less decision device). For transmission of 1 symbol, it was found that the front-end filter should be `matched’ to the received pulse. p(t) h(t) + front-end filter transmit pulse n(t) AWGN channel transmitter receiver Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  10. Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver: In Lecture-4, optimal receiver design was based on a minimum distance criterion : • Transmitted signal is • Received signal • p’(t)=p(t)*h(t)=transmitted pulse, filtered by channel Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  11. 1/Ts Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver: In Lecture-4, it was found that for transmission of 1 symbol, the receiver structure of Lecture 3 is indeed optimal ! p’(t)=p(t)*h(t) sample at t=0 p(t) p’(-t)* h(t) + front-end filter transmit pulse n(t) AWGN channel transmitter receiver Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  12. 1/Ts Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 • Receiver:For transmission of a symbol sequence, the optimal receiver structure is... p(t) p’(-t)* h(t) + front-end filter transmit pulse n(t) AWGN sample at t=k.Ts channel transmitter receiver Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  13. Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver: • This receiver structure is remarkable, for it is based on symbol-rate sampling (=usually below Nyquist-rate sampling), which appears to be allowable if preceded by a matched-filter front-end. • Criterion for decision device is too complicated. Need for a simpler criterion/procedure... Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  14. 1/Ts p(t) h(t) + p’(-t)* front-end filter transmit pulse 1/L*(1/z*) n(t) AWGN channel transmitter receiver Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver:1st simplification by insertion of an additional (magic) filter (after sampler). * Filter = `pre-cursor equalizer’ (see below) * Complete front-end = `Whitened matched filter’ Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  15. 1/Ts Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver:The additional filter is `magic’ in that it turns the complete transmitter-receiver chain into a simple input-output model: p(t) h(t) + p’(-t)* front-end filter transmit pulse 1/L*(1/z*) n(t) AWGN channel transmitter receiver Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  16. Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver:The additional filter is `magic’ in that it turns the complete transmitter-receiver chain into a simple input-output model: = additive white Gaussian noise means interference from future (`pre-cursor) symbols has been cancelled, hence only interference from past (`post-cursor’) symbols remains Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  17. Summary of Lectures (1-2-)3-4 Receiver: Based on the input-output model one can compute the transmitted symbol sequence as A recursive procedure for this = Viterbi Algorithm Problem = complexity proportional to M^N ! (N=channel-length=number of non-zero taps in H(z) ) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  18. Problem statement (revisited) • Cheap alternative for MLSE/Viterbi ? • Solution: equalization filter + memory-less decision device (`slicer’) Linear filters Non-linear filters (decision feedback) • Complexity : linear in number filter taps • Performance : with channel coding, approaches MLSE performance Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  19. Preliminaries (I) • Our starting point will be the input-output model for transmitter + channel + receiver whitened matched filter front-end Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  20. H(z) Preliminaries (II) • PS: z-transform is `shorthand notation’ for discrete-time signals… …and for input/output behavior of discrete-time systems Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  21. Preliminaries (III) • PS: if a different receiver front-end is used (e.g. MF instead of WMF, or …), a similar model holds for which equalizers can be designed in a similar fashion... Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  22. Preliminaries (IV) PS: properties/advantages of the WMF front end • additive noise = white(colored in general model) • H(z) does not have anti-causal taps pps: anti-causal taps originate, e.g., from transmit filter design (RRC, etc.). practical implementation based on causal filters + delays... • H(z) `minimum-phase’ : =`stable’ zeroes, hence (causal) inverse exists & stable = energy of the impulse response maximally concentrated in the early samples Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  23. Preliminaries (V) • `Equalization’: compensate for channel distortion. Resulting signal fed into memory-less decision device. • In this Lecture : - channel distortion model assumed to be known - no constraints on the complexity of the equalization filter (number of filter taps) • Assumptions relaxed in Lecture 6 Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  24. Zero-forcing & MMSE Equalizers 2 classes : Zero-forcing (ZF) equalizers eliminate inter-symbol-interference (ISI) at the slicer input Minimum mean-square error (MMSE) equalizers tradeoff between minimizing ISI and minimizing noise at the slicer input Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  25. C(z) H(z) Zero-forcing Equalizers Zero-forcing Linear Equalizer (LE) : - equalization filter is inverse of H(z) - decision device (`slicer’) • Problem : noise enhancement ( C(z).W(z) large) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  26. Zero-forcing Equalizers Zero-forcing Linear Equalizer (LE) : - ps: under the constraint of zero-ISI at the slicer input, the LE with whitened matched filter front-end is optimal in that it minimizes the noise at the slicer input - pps: if a different front-end is used, H(z) may have unstable zeros (non-minimum-phase), hence may be `difficult’ to invert. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  27. Zero-forcing Equalizers Zero-forcing Non-linear Equalizer Decision Feedback Equalization (DFE) : - derivation based on `alternative’ inverse of H(z) : (ps: this is possible if H(z) has , which is another property of the WMF model) - now move slicer inside the feedback loop : H(z) 1-H(z) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  28. H(z) D(z) Zero-forcing Equalizers moving slicer inside the feedback loop has… - beneficial effect on noise: noise is removed that would otherwise circulate back through the loop - beneficial effect on stability of the feedback loop: output of the slicer is always bounded, hence feedback loop always stable Performance intermediate between MLSE and linear equaliz. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  29. C(z) H(z) D(z) Zero-forcing Equalizers Decision Feedback equalization (DFE) : - general DFE structure C(z): `pre-cursor’ equalizer (eliminates ISI from future symbols) D(z): `post-cursor’ equalizer (eliminates ISI from past symbols) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  30. C(z) H(z) D(z) Zero-forcing Equalizers Decision Feedback equalization (DFE) : - Problem : Error propagation Decision errors at the output of the slicer cause a corrupted estimate of the postcursor ISI. Hence a single error causes a reduction of the noise margin for a number of future decisions. Results in increased bit-error rate. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  31. Zero-forcing Equalizers `Figure of merit’ • receiver with higher `figure of merit’ has lower error probability • is`matched filter bound’(transmission of 1 symbol) • DFE-performance lower than MLSE-performance, as DFE relies on only the first channel impulse response sample (eliminating all other ‘s), while MLSE uses energy of all taps . DFE benefits from minimum-phase property (cfr. supra, p.20) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  32. MMSE Equalizers • Zero-forcing equalizers: minimize noise at slicer input under zero-ISI constraint • Generalize the criterion of optimality to allow for residual ISI at the slicer & reduce noise variance at the slicer =Minimum mean-square error equalizers Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  33. C(z) H(z) MMSE Equalizers MMSE Linear Equalizer (LE) : - combined minimization of ISI and noise leads to Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  34. MMSE Equalizers - signal power spectrum (normalized) - noise power spectrum (white) - for zero noise power -> zero-forcing - (in the nominator) is a discrete-time matched filter, often `difficult’ to realize in practice (stable poles in H(z) introduce anticausal MF) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  35. C(z)E(z) H(z) 1-E(z) MMSE Equalizers MMSE Decision Feedback Equalizer : • MMSE-LE has correlated `slicer errors’ (=difference between slicer in- and output) • MSE may be further reduced by incorporating a `whitening’ filter (prediction filter) E(z) for the slicer errors • E(z)=1 -> linear equalizer • Theory & formulas : see textbooks Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  36. Fractionally Spaced Equalizers Motivation: • All equalizers (up till now) based on (whitened) matched filter front-end, i.e. with symbol-rate sampling, preceded by an (analog) front-end filter matched to the received pulse p’(t)=p(t)*h(t). • Symbol-rate sampling = below Nyquist-rate sampling (aliasing!). Hence matched filter is crucial for performance ! • MF front-end requires analog filter, adapted to channel h(t), hence difficult to realize... • A fortiori: what if channel h(t) is unknown ? • Synchronization problem : correct sampling phase is crucial for performance ! Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  37. Fractionally Spaced Equalizers • Fractionally spaced equalizers are based on Nyquist-rate sampling, usually 2 x symbol-rate sampling (if excess bandwidth < 100%). • Nyquist-rate sampling also provides sufficient statistics, hence provides appropriate front-end for optimal receivers. • Sampler preceded by fixed (i.e. channel independent) analog anti-aliasing (e.g. ideal low-pass) front-end filter. • `Matched filter’ is moved to digital domain (after sampler). • Avoids synchronization problem associated with MF front-end. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  38. Fractionally Spaced Equalizers • Input-output model for fractionally spaced equalization : `symbol rate’ samples : `intermediate’ samples : • may be viewed as 1-input/2-outputs system Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  39. F(f) Fractionally Spaced Equalizers • Discrete-time matched filter + Equalizer (LE) : • Fractionally spaced equalizer (LE) : 1/2Ts 2 C(z) MF(z) equalizer 1/2Ts F(f) C(z) 2 Fractionally spaced equalizer Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  40. Fractionally Spaced Equalizers • Fractionally spaced equalizer (DFE): • Theory & formulas : see textbooks & Lecture 6 1/2Ts F(f) C(z) 2 D(z) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  41. Conclusions • Cheaper alternatives to MLSE, based on equalization filters + memoryless decision device (slicer) • Symbol-rate equalizers : -LE versus DFE -zero-forcing versus MMSE -optimal with matched filter front-end, but several assumptions underlying this structure are often violated in practice • Fractionally spaced equalizers (see also Lecture-6) Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

  42. Assignment 3.1 • Symbol-rate zero-forcing linear equalizer has i.e. a finite impulse response (`all-zeroes’) filter is turned into an infinite impulse response filter • Investigate this statement for the case of fractionally spaced equalization, for a simple channel model and discover that there exist finite-impulse response inverses in this case. This represents a significant advantage in practice. Investigate the minimal filter length for the zero-forcing equalization filter. Module-3 Transmission Marc Moonen Lecture-5 Equalization K.U.Leuven-ESAT/SISTA

More Related