1 / 24

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 6 Lecture 29. Mass Transport: Illustrative Problems. Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras. Mass Transport: Illustrative Problems. SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM. SOLUTION. Catalytic Converter. SOLUTION.

yetty
Télécharger la présentation

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 6 Lecture 29 Mass Transport: Illustrative Problems Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

  2. Mass Transport: Illustrative Problems

  3. SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM

  4. SOLUTION Catalytic Converter

  5. SOLUTION • Mechanism of CO(g) transport to the wall If Re < 2100 (see below),transport to the wall is by Fick diffusion of CO(g) through the prevailing mixture.

  6. SOLUTION Therefore Analogous heat transfer diffusivity is for gas mixture b. Discuss whether the Mass transfer Analogy Conditions(M A C) and Heat transfer Analogy Conditions (H A C) are met; implications ? • Since Mmix and Mco are close hence we will assume

  7. SOLUTION c. Sc for the mixture : Now: and:

  8. SOLUTION therefore therefore

  9. SOLUTION d. L=? We will need Re Now: therefore (laminar-flow regime)

  10. SOLUTION For a square channel and (used below). If then the mass-transfer analogy is:

  11. SOLUTION where We estimate at which If then

  12. SOLUTION therefore Tentatively, assume F (entrance =1).Then: that is, (at which F (entrance) is indeed ). Solving for L gives: L =8.3 cm ( needed to give 95 % CO-Conversion).

  13. SOLUTION e. Discuss underlying assumptions, e.g., fully developed flow? nearly constant thermo physical properties? no homogeneous chemical reaction? “ diffusion-controlled” surface reaction? f. If the catalyst were “ poisoned,” it would not be able to maintain . This would cause to exceed 8.3 cm. If catalyst were completely deactivated, then and, of course,

  14. SOLUTION g. If the heat of combustion is 67.8 kcal/mole CO, how much heat is delivered to the catalyst channel per unit time? Overall CO balance gives the CO-consumption rate/channel: where

  15. SOLUTION Moreover, hence, and

  16. SOLUTION Therefore • The “sensible” heat transfer required to keep the wall at 500 K can be calculated from a heat balance on the 8.3 cm-long duct- i.e., once we calculate , we have :

  17. SOLUTION where Mixing cup avg temp at duct outlet ?

  18. SOLUTION Again, we see that Moreover,

  19. SOLUTION therefore and

  20. SOLUTION Therefore,

  21. SOLUTION h. “Quasi-Steady” Application of These Results? Note that: and hence, if the characteristic period of the unsteadiness >> 8.2 ms, the previous results can be used at each flow condition.

  22. SOLUTION • Pressure Drop • We have: • Therefore

  23. SOLUTION But Therefore

  24. SOLUTION From overall momentum balance:

More Related