1 / 64

Non-accidental trauma

Non-accidental trauma . Kelly Gettig, RN, MSN, CPNP-PC/AC TCH Advanced Practice Provider Conference February 7, 2014. Increase awareness of the prevalence and signs and symptoms of NAT in children. Review epidemiology and clinical manifestations of NAT.

yoshe
Télécharger la présentation

Non-accidental trauma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-accidental trauma Kelly Gettig, RN, MSN, CPNP-PC/AC TCH Advanced Practice Provider Conference February 7, 2014

  2. Increase awareness of the prevalence and signs and symptoms of NAT in children. • Review epidemiology and clinical manifestations of NAT. • Discuss the importance of non-biased screening for NAT using an objective algorithm. • Review radiologic findings in skeletal injuries and abusive head trauma. • Review multiple case scenarios of abuse with a focus on abusive head trauma. • Illustrate the importance of a high index of suspicion for AHT with non-specific presenting symptoms. Objectives

  3. Epidemiology • 1 million cases substantiated annually • 7% children experience physical abuse • 2500 deaths annually in US • Texas leads nation in child abuse deaths • 50% deaths – families with previous CPS history • Past history of abuse – 50% chance repeat abuse; 10% chance of death US Dept. Health & Human Services, 2007 Rajaramet al, 2011 Gilbert et al, 2009 Clarke et al, 2011

  4. Soft tissue injury – most common type of injury • Bruising, bites, burns, pattern injuries • Face, neck, ears, torso, buttocks • Intraoral trauma Clinical manifestations

  5. 2 yo male s/p scald burns to bilat hands • Sustained at daycare - “washing hands in the sink” • IVF, morphine x 1, hands wrapped in sterile towels • Transported to ED Case scenario #1

  6. Clinical manifestations • Fractures – 2nd most common type of injury • 55% of abused children • Multiple fractures more common with abuse • Ribs, radius/ulna, tib/fib, humerus, femur, clavicle, skull • Transverse, spiral, oblique • Metaphysealfractures Scherl et al 2011 Leventhal et al 2008 Kemp et al 2008

  7. Incidence of Fractures Attributable to Abuse in Young Hospitalized Children: Results From Analysis of a United States Database

  8. Corner fracture

  9. “Bucket handle” fracture

  10. Healing posterior rib fractures

  11. 3 mo male, 30 wk preemie • Admitted to PICU in resp distress • Viral illness, high flow NC oxygen, nebs • Exam shows multiple small/mild bruises, abrasions – forehead, trunk, penis/scrotum • Linear pattern bruise to abdomen • Hematologic and metabolic workups started Case scenario #2

  12. Red flags Injury inconsistent with mechanism Vague/varying history, delay in care Developmentally incompatible history Epidemiological factors cannot guide decision making

  13. Case scenario #3 • 5 wk old male brought in for URI symptoms-Flu A+ • RN noted bruising to abdomenNAT work-up completedSkeletal Survey: 2 right parietal skull fxs Bilateral distal tibialmetaphysealfx L proximal tibia metaphysealfx 2 additional lucencies on tibias bilaterally Right fibula lucencyCT head: negCT abdomen: bilatposterior 6th/7th rib fxs

  14. NAT algorithm • Pre-ambulatory infants and/or <12 mos. with skeletal fracture or other concern for abuse: • Thorough history • Head to toe physical assessment • Skeletal survey • UA, ALT/AST • Social work consult

  15. NAT algorithm • Head CT • Neuro deficits or evidence of trauma above the clavicle • Infants <6 months • Abdominal CT with contrast for: • Abnormal abdominal exam • UA with >10 RBCs per HPF • AST/ALT >200mg/dl

  16. NAT algorithm • Further workup based on findings: • Child abuse team consultation • PT/PTT, platelet function assay • Ophthalmology consult • Urine toxicology • MRI brain

  17. Case scenario #4 • 4 mo infant presents with scalp swelling following a fall off the changing table onto tile a few hours ago. She is alert and neuro intact and tolerating PO well. • CT head - left parietal non-displaced linear skull fracture with no underlying hemorrhage. • H & P – unremarkable • Skeletal survey – otherwise negative • UA – negative for blood • ALT/AST – normal • SW consult – no concerns • Neurosurgery consult – follow up in clinic in 2 weeks

  18. Case scenario #5 9 month female presents to ED with mother Cc: right leg swelling & pain s/p fall from bed Displaced femur fx identified NAT protocol followed Skeletal survey: multiple metaphysealfxs Chest CT: right scapula fx & 6th rib fx Discharged with foster family

  19. Most common cause of traumatic death in infancy • Most common cause of neurotrauma <2 yrs • 29.7 in 100,000 children < 1 yr • For every identified case, 152 go undiagnosed • 5.6% of parents of 6 mo. olds report shaking Keenan et al (2003) Theordore et al (2005) Reijneveld et al (2004) Abusive head trauma

  20. 13-35% victims die • Survivors • >60% significant neuro impairment • Considerably worse outcomes than non-inflicted Parks et al (2011) Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn et al (2011) Abusive head trauma

  21. Prematurity • Physical/mental disability • Male • Age 2-6 months • Young parents, lower SE status • Unstable family situation, military service • Substance abuse, mental disorders • Unreasonable developmental expectations Risk factors

  22. #1 - Father • #2 - Mother’s boyfriend • #3 - Female babysitter • #4 – Mother Herman et al (2011) Perpetrators

  23. Rotation-acceleration forces • Tearing of bridging veins across subdural spaces • Bleeding and subdural hematoma (SDH) • Diffuse brain dysfunction • Cerebral edema, hypoxic-ischemic injury • Retinal hemorrhages Pathophysiology

  24. History of minor trauma or no trauma • No trauma – 92% PPV • Neurological impairment • Altered LOC (77%) • Seizures (43-50%) • Vomiting (15%) Hettler et al (2003) Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn et al (2011) Clinical presentation

  25. Apnea - critical distinguishing factor • 93% PPV • Respiratory insufficiency complicated by delayed care • Repeated trauma to respiratory centers • Out of hospital CPR • Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn et al (2011) Kemp et al (2011) Presentation

  26. AHT should be considered in ALL children presenting with neurotrauma* Abusive head trauma

  27. 4 yo female presents to ED with Cc: vomiting. No diarrhea or fever. • Petechiae noted around eyes. • Dx with UTI and sent home. • 48 hrs later, found unresponsive by caregiver. • EMS to scene - GCS 4, posturing, blown right pupil • Extensive abdominal bruising; facial and extremity bruising. • 100% BVM, spine immobilized, transported to ED Case scenario #6

  28. CT head with diffuse edema, loss of gray-white differentiation, SDH, and extensive herniation. CT abd/pelvis with mesenteric hematoma. • To OR for evacuation and hemicraniectomy, ventriculostomy, ICP monitor; exploratory laparotomy. Case scenario #6

  29. 5 month old male - fall off bed 3-4 ft. onto hard floor • No LOC, but fussy, vomited • Brought to ED by parents later in day • Presented alert but very quickly deteriorated • Minor bruising to left cheek/FH Case scenario #7

  30. EMS to scene of 2 month old who “fell off the couch” at babysitter’s. • Found cyanotic and responsive only to pain • Hematoma to temporal-parietal area • 100% BVM with color improved • C-collar applied • Posturing en route, right pupil dilated, deviated gaze • IO placed, valium given Case scenario #8

  31. Arrived in the ED; intubated and to CT scanner • Left parietal skull fracture, SDH with herniation • 3% NaCl, phenobarb, PRBCs • To OR for decompressivecraniectomy, ICP monitor • ICPs 50s despite maximum medical management • Parents decide to withdraw care on HD# 7 Case scenario #8

More Related