1 / 26

E-Passport standard status and efforts at Japan IC passport study committee

E-Passport standard status and efforts at Japan IC passport study committee. 2004/09/ 16. Head of Japan ISO/IEC JTC1/SC17/WG3 Member of ICAO-NTWG Manager of Japanese IC-passport study committee. Junichi Sakaki (Panasonic) J-sakaki@so-net.ne.jp. Self Introduction.

zagiri
Télécharger la présentation

E-Passport standard status and efforts at Japan IC passport study committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E-Passport standard status and efforts at Japan IC passport study committee 2004/09/16 • Head of Japan ISO/IEC JTC1/SC17/WG3 • Member of ICAO-NTWG • Manager of Japanese IC-passport study committee Junichi Sakaki (Panasonic) J-sakaki@so-net.ne.jp

  2. Self Introduction • 1995 - 1997: R&D for Contactless Smartcard prototype • 1997 - 2000：Contactless IC card standardization • 1997 - :Driver License Standardization • (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC17/WG10 Secretary) • 1998 - :Machine Readable Travel Document • (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC17/WG3 TF4 leader) • (Member of ICAO-TAG-NTWG) • (Manager of Japanese IC-passport study committee)

  3. Relationship ICAO and ISO at Passport standard ICAO Secretary General ISO IEC Airport Bureau JTC1 Aviation Security &Facilitation Branch SC17 (Card & ID) Facilitation Section WG3 (MRTD) TF1 (New Technology) TAG (Technical Advisory Group) Official Liaison TF2 (LDS) EPWG* DCFWG* NTWG* TF3 (PKI) * EPWG: Education Promotion WG * DCFWG: Document Contents and Format WG * NTWG: New Technology WG TF4 (Testing)

  4. Passport standard committee in Japan Japanese Industrial Standard Committee JISC Information Standard Technology Committee of Japan ITSCJ Japan Business Machine and Information System Industries Association JBMIA SC17 (Card and Identification) SC27 Security WG3 (MRTDs) SC37 Biometrics SWG1 (Contactless) PKI TF SC17/WG8 Contactless Card Biometric TF

  5. Collaboration of ICAO and ISO • SC17/WG3 is sole liaison partner for ICAO-TAG/MRTD within ISO • Other liaisons : International Criminal Police Organization(ICPO) • International Air Transport Association (IATA) • Airport Council International(ACI) • Collaboration has been started from early 1990's • Role of ISO is endorsement of ICAO document(ICAO Doc. 9303) • ICAO document is usually published without ISO endorsement by only ICAO membership county’s agreement and authority of ISO is just Fast Track voting after ICAO publishing. • Six member from SC17/WG3 are allowed to participate into ICAO meeting as ISO representatives. • ISO members are acting editors of the ICAO technical reports.

  6. ICAO TAG-NTWG • Two or three times meetings are held in every year. • (Den Haag, Tokyo, Oakland : 2004) • Participants are increased after September 11 (Mostly over fifty). • Major participants are Government official • (Passport Office, Immigration, Customs, Police) • ・Regular participating countries • （USA,UK,France,Germany,Canada,NZ,Australia,Netherlands, • Italy,Latvia,Swiss,Singapore,Korea,Japan) • Chairman: Gary McDonald (ICAO/Canada Passport Office)

  7. ICAO－Doc. 9303

  8. ICAO TR • Three Technical Reports （Biometrics、Logical Data Structure:LDS、PKI） • Have been published as 2004 version at Web site（http://www.icao.int/mrtd/）

  9. ICAO TR (Cont) 2003/5:Ver-1, 2004/7:Ver-2 Objective： Identification, Aid for Border control, Data structure Basic Guideline: Global Interoperability Need to develop by 2005/10 for US-Visit program Reliability, Practicability, Durability • Issues • Biometrics technology is immature stage and standard is not final • Future development of technology is unclear(Backward compatibility) • Compatibility with public opinion, Law, and Culture of member countries. • Technology obsolescence, Biometric aging (validity can be 10 years?) • Card interoperability ICAO TR is scheduled to integrate into ICAO Doc. 9303 in 2005.

  10. ICAO TR (Cont) ・ Recommended Biometrics Face: Primary　（Image） Finger: Secondary　（Image） + Optional Minutiae Iris: Secondary　（Image） →　Pattent Issue（Base Patent only）had been resolved by mutual agreement of ICAO and Iridian Tec. Berlin Resolution(2002/6) ICAO TAG-MRTD/NTWG endorses the use of face recognition as the globally interoperable biometric for machine assisted identity confirmation with machine readable travel documents. ICAO TAG-MRTD/NTWG further recognizes that member states may elect to use of fingerprint and/or iris recognition as additional biometric technologies in support of machine assisted identity confirmation. Adoption Unanimous

  11. ICAO TR (Cont) • New Orleans Resolution (2004/3) • ICAO TAG-MRTD/NTWG recognizes that Member States currently and will continue to utilize the facial image as the primary identifier for MRTDs and as such endorses the use of standardized digitally-stored facial images as the globally interoperable biometric to support facial recognition technologies for machine assisted identity verification with machine-readable travel documents. • ICAO TAG-MRTD/NTWG further recognizes that in addition to the use of a digitally stored facial image, Member States can use standardized digitally-stored fingerprint and/or iris* images as additional globally interoperable biometrics in support of machine assisted verification and/or identification. • Member States, in their initial deployment of MRTDs with biometrics identifiers, are encouraged to adopt contactless IC media of sufficient capacity to facilitate on-board storage of additional MRTD data and biometric identifiers. • *subject to the resolution of intellectual property issues

  12. Major topics of ICAO TR 2004 Rquired Memory Capacity : Minimum 32k Byte（Case of One Facial Biometrics） Interface : Proximity IC card(ISO/IEC14443) only Location of IC chip : Location and Material are Note specified All personal data are written in issuing process(Can not be changed after issuing) To resolve interoperability issues, supplementary practices have been added Facial data is defined as not privacy and not encrypted Optional Finger and Iris data should be encrypted as privacy and its means is left as agreement between countries Basic rule is free to read all personal data

  13. Major topics of ICAO TR 2004 Document security Passive Authentication : Authenticity and Integrity Basic Access control : Skimming and Eavesdropping for Privacy Active Authentication : Chip Substitution and Data Copying Face Biometrics spec is simply refer to ISO/IEC 19794-5, and 19785-1 Image encording : JPEG, JPEG2000(Optional) Protection Profile (IC chip & card OS) : EAL4+ Even if IC chip is broken, Passport is still valid by printed data (electronic data is just an aid). Lots of Option, No best practice for receiving state

  14. Issues on ICAO TR Still unclear on Public key distribution and Revocation list Undefined on VISA data Virtual VISA using internet? Append VISA data on a same chip memory? Independent VISA sticker(2D barcode, IC-Chip, others)? Issuing cost, Chip durability for 10 years? Insufficiency on face biometrics accuracy(Aging, Lighting) International interoperability issue on contactless chip interface Lack of consideration on transaction speed at immigration booth (Slower than human?) Several countries are in procurement stage although standard is not yet completed

  15. Reason of ICAO decision Why Face recognition? Few changes are required on the issuing process Portrait has been used at passport and immigration for long time Psychological comfort Compatible with human inspection (Machine verification is aid) Compatible with negative list which has been accumulated Why Image? Good interoperability Flexibility for future technology progress Can be reused for visual human inspection Why Contactless-IC? Enough memory capacity（32k 64k Byte is available） Easy to handle High speed data read High security

  16. IC chip implementation Inlay （Thin plastic sheet with IC-chip and antenna） IC chip Antenna coil Issuers choice • Chip location :Cover page, Middle, Back cover • Material :PVC or PET • Chip size(Phisical & Memory):proportionality relation • Read range :Tradeoff relationship at functionality &Speed • Cost :Depends on memory capacity & functionality

  17. Issuing process (Example) Inlay Assemble to Booklet Transport File create Lock with transport key Application Complete Print / Personalize Grant Scan from Application form （Identification）

  18. Logical Data Structure MF Issuer Application (DF) User Application (DF) (Not defined) Common Data (EF) MRZ Data (EF) Other Personal Data (EF) Note MF: Master File DF: Dedicated File EF: Elementary File MRZ : Machine Readable Zone (i.e. OCR) Face Data (EF) (Option) Finger Data (EF) Security Object (EF) Iris Data (EF) (Option) (Digital Signature)

  19. Digital Signature Generate key pair Issuing Key （Secret Key） Verification Key （Public Key） Data Verify data using public key Data Signature Compute and add digital signature using a secret key Signature Inspection Issuer

  20. ICAO Schedule ICAO TR Ver-2 July 2004 ICAO TR Ver-1 May 2003 NZ NTWG Dec Glasgow NTWG Sep London NTWG July Tokyo NTWG Sep New Orleans NTWG Mar Den Hague NTWG Feb 2003 2004 ICAO TAG14 （Montreal）Apr ICAO TAG15 (Montreal) May

  21. ●Security ●Compatibility of IC reader ●Operation in Issuing ●Legal system ●IC Specification ●Biometrics ●Durability of Passport Card e-Passport Study Committee ICAO/NTWG Other ministries IC card Immigration Airport Domestic SC17/WG3(passport) Ministryof Foreign Affairs e-passport Study committee

  22. e-Passport Study Committee : Timeline e-Passport Introduction Report

  23. Face biometrics experiments １．Aging test • Experiment outline : • Face recognition test by using past 11(mostly 6) years database of diplomatic passport. • Since the database contain many photos taken at different year for same person, it is anticipated that it can be used for an good aging test data. • Objective : • Validate passport period of validity from biometric points of view ２．Photo quality test • Experiment outline : • Specify obstructive factor at photo quality through various environments (speed photo box, simulation of airport etc.) of photo shoot. • Objective : • Review a current photo guideline of MOFA

  24. Image quality test -1 e-passport Immigration Photo studio Pre Face Recognition Test Best Practice Instant photo stand ●32-person images ●8 engines

  25. Image quality test -2 e-passport Immigration Simulated immigration booth (bright lighting) Best Practice Face Recognition Test Simulated immigration booth(dark lighting) Instant photo stand ●300 images ●9 engines

  26. e-passport Immigration Aging test 6 Years ago 5 Years ago 4 Years ago New Photo Face aging Recognition Test 3 Years ago 2 Years ago 1 Years ago ●Total 32,000 images ●10,000-person images ●7 engines Present image 11 years database (Mostly 6 years)

More Related