1 / 22

HUSD Budget Update

This report presents an in-depth update on the HUSD budget for fiscal year 2008, detailing rankings among Arizona school districts and outlining budgetary challenges and strategies for fiscal management moving forward. HUSD ranks in the top 16% among all Arizona districts for classroom spending per pupil. The report addresses reductions in the budget totaling $818,777 due to state cuts and outlines the implications of declining student enrollment on future funding. Strategic reductions and potential savings measures are discussed for the 2009-2010 budget.

zahur
Télécharger la présentation

HUSD Budget Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HUSD Budget Update March, 2009

  2. HOW DOES HUSD “STACK UP” AMONG DISTRICTS IN ARIZONA Office of the Arizona Auditor General Special Study--Fiscal Year 2008

  3. HUSD Classroom Dollars Fiscal year 2008 averages per pupil (State Average is 57.1%) HUSD ranks 36th out of 230 total AZ districts = top 16% HUSD ranks 4th out of 39 “large” AZ districts (5,000 to 19,999 students) = top 10%

  4. HUSD Classroom Dollars Expenditures by Function

  5. HUSD Comparative Information

  6. PROPOSITION 301(Teachers, Librarians, Counselors, Speech Therapists, Nurses) ► Formula driven, based on State sales tax revenues ► Distributed to districts by “per-pupil” allocations, 92% of total directly to teachers, 8% for teacher professional development 04-05 = $3,908 05-06 = $5,735 06-07 = $5,533 07-08 = $5,756 08-09 = approx $5,000 09-10 = unknown

  7. DO STAFF/TEACHER RATIO COMPARED TO LIKE SIZE ARIZONA DISTRICTS Prescott Unified SD 12.1% (37.5/311) Cave Creek Unified SD 12.2% (40/327) Flowing Wells Unified SD 12.7% (38/300) Lake Havasu Unified SD 13.1% (44.5/340) Chino Valley Unified SD 17.3% (26/150) Humboldt Unified SD 9.1% (33/364)

  8. GRANT-FUNDED POSITIONS Supplemental (CANNOT SUPPLANT) instructional and administrative services in the District. Grants pay for: ►Compensatory Education/Parental Classes - Comp Ed Grant, Immigrant Grant, Title III Grant ►Data Specialist to track NCLB academic achievement data - Title IIA ►ELL Data/Assessment - Title III ►Instructional Specialists - Title IIA ►Mentors - Title IIA, Prop 301 ►Reading Coaches/Interventionists - Reading First ►Reading Coaches at non-Reading First sites - Indian Gaming ►SPED Positions & Other Aides– IDEA, Early Childhood Block Grant, Title I ►Summer School -Title 1, Title III, Comp Ed

  9. WHAT WE NOW KNOW ABOUT THE2008- 2009 HUSD Budget

  10. State reduced the HUSD budget by $818,777 • $144,860 from Soft Capital allocation • $673,917 from Base Support Level (M&O Fund) HUSD addressed these current year cuts by: • Freezing Soft Capital – Approximate Savings = $563,909 • Capitalizing on savings resulting from current year vacancies – Approximate Savings = $116,800 (32%admin. function, 33%cert, 35%class) • Recapturing cost resulting from lower fuel prices – Approximate Savings = $71,000 ► Indirect Costs from Food and Nutrition absorbed approximate balance of $67,068

  11. ADDITIONAL SAVINGS B-Bond Project ►B-Bond Project Manager eliminated, saving $500,000 to benefit additional District projects. Bond money cannot be co-mingled with M&O funds. ►Hired 2 previously M&O-funded employees to serve as Internal B-Bond Project Manager and Maintenance Director...This legally comes out of B-Bond funds--Total Savings to M&O=$74,000

  12. WHAT WE “THINK” WE “MIGHT” KNOW… “MAYBE….” REGARDING THE 2009-2010 BUDGET

  13. ► HUSD is down 160 students per 100-day ADM count = Approximately a $650,000 loss of Weighted Student Count revenue in 2009-2010 ► Increase in health benefits = 5% ~ $160,000 • State discussed various reduction options in mid-January, 2009. Possible loss of M&O funding in the following areas: ►Base Student Level (BSL)=<$205> ~ $2 million ►Full-day Kindergarten= ~$1.2 million ►Excess utilities= ~$470,000 ►Teacher Experience Index reduced and phased out over eight years= ~$70,000 ► Soft Capital possible reduction or elimination ~ $1.3 million • HUSD’s estimated share of this is $3.5 to $4.5 million dollars (10% to 12% of HUSD budget) INFORMATION GARNERED FROM STATE EDUC. ORGANIZATIONS (ASA, ASBA etc.) AND MEDIA REPORTS. NOT OFFICIAL INFORMATION!!!

  14. DISTRICT STRATEGIESFOR 2009-2010

  15. EFFORTS DIVIDED INTO TWO TIERS TIER I -- District budget reductions regardless of the final 09-10 cuts imposed by the State---- Based on declining enrollment and prudent fiscal management. TIER II -- Potential budget reductions based on “Worse-Case Scenarios”

  16. TIER I Total M&O Savings~$1,710,000 • Eliminate 2 District Office support staff during 2008-09 • Eliminate administrator performance pay for 2009-10 • Eliminate a high school assistant principal position for 2009-10 • Reduce administrative cell phone costs for 2009-10 • Change health care eligibility requirements for part-time staff for 2009-10 • Eliminate mail delivery driver & 3 maintenance staff during 2008-09 • Eliminate high school copy center position for 2009-10 • Reduce substitute spending during 2008-09…GOOD PROGRESS!!! • Adjust class sizes, reduce teacher positions through attrition for 2009-10 • Reduce ELL teacher positions based on class needs for 2009-10 • Reduce SPED/ELL aide positions based on class needs for 2009-10 • Revise stipend schedule for 2009-10 • Reduce M&O spending for athletics, increase pay-to-play, tax credit $ to cover High/Middle/Elementary stipends for 2009-2010

  17. TIER II IN ADDITION TO THE $1.7 MIL TIER I SAVINGS--OTHER POTENTIAL M&O SAVINGS • Eliminate a middle school Assistant Principal position, share 1 between BMMS and GHMS • Fee-based full-day kindergarten • 175-day school year (requires State action) ►Adjust administrator wages ►Adjust certified/classified wages • Reduce elementary specials staffing (e.g. music, P.E., library, computer) • Reduce nursing services & other library services ►Additional certified & classified staff reductions • Possible salary reductions/furloughs ►Employee contribution towards health premiums

  18. HOW DOES A REDUCTION IN FORCE WORK?

  19. REDUCTION IN FORCE (Policy CCQA, GDQA) ► Identify need to reduce staff--based on financial needs, program needs, etc. ► Recommendations to Governing Board ► Use attrition first to reduce positions ► Follow District policy to execute RIF and bring staff back after RIF ► If more reductions needed beyond attrition... ►Certified: Based on “certification” and “length of service” ►Classified: Based on “position” and “length of service” ► April 15 State contract deadline

  20. AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT aka “FEDERAL STIMULUS PACKAGE” ► Additional Title I Grant funds--- HUSD share=Approx. $670,000 ► Additional SPED Grant funds--- HUSD share=Approx. $1.1 million ► Limitations: To SUPPLEMENT (add new) NOT SUPPLANT (pay for previous M&O expense). Temporary exception being considered ► State will receive ~$1 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund. Intended to offset State budget deficit; should reduce needed cuts ► Some incentive grants with lots of strings attached ► Many unknowns at this time

  21. Remember….. It is ALL OF US against the problem!!!!

  22. Q&A

More Related