60 likes | 207 Vues
This report discusses the effects of modifying purlin geometry on elastic buckling (Mcr) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM) strength. Four groups conducted experiments focusing on various aspects: Group 1 analyzed the impact of lip length and geometry; Group 2 examined flange width and geometry; Group 3 investigated support placement with springs; and Group 4 transformed Z-sections into C-sections to evaluate changes in Mcr and Pcr. Each group presents their findings to enhance understanding and engineering practices regarding purlin design and structural performance.
E N D
Purlin Play and Report centerline dimensions h = 7.507 in. b = 1.889 in. d = 0.795 in. r = 0.217 in. t = 0.059 in. properties E = 29500 ksi n = 0.3 G = 11346 ksi fy = 55 ksi
Team Exercises Group 1:Team Lip Examine the influence of changing the lip length or lip geometry on the elastic buckling (Mcr), and (if time) the DSM strength – share then report Group 2: Team Flange Examine the influence of changing the flange width or geometry on the elastic buckling (Mcr), and (if time) the DSM strength – share then report Group 3: Team Supports Examine the influence of adding springs or supports at different appropriate locations in the section on the elastic buckling (Mcr) and (if time) the DSM strength – share then report Group 4: Make that Z a C Take the same Z geometry and make it into a C-section with 90 deg. lips. Study the impact on Mcr, Pcr and DSM strength (if time available) – share then report