1 / 30

PARCC WORKSHOP

PARCC WORKSHOP. Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready. OBJECTIVES . Gain an understanding of the PARCC assessment system; Understand PARCC’s timeline for past, present, and future work; Explore the assessment design in ELA and Mathematics;

zarifa
Télécharger la présentation

PARCC WORKSHOP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready

  2. OBJECTIVES Gain an understanding of the PARCC assessment system; Understand PARCC’s timeline for past, present, and future work; Explore the assessment design in ELA and Mathematics; Gain an awareness of tools to better understand the PARCC Assessment System

  3. PARCC State Membership

  4. Assessment Design

  5. Assessment Structure

  6. Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) for the PARCC Assessments ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validityof the assessments, increase the comparability of year-to year results, and increase efficiencies/reduce costs.

  7. Looking Ahead: Spring 2014 and Beyond

  8. Three General Take-Aways PARCC is on-time and on-task. The PARCC assessments are high quality and reflect good classroom instructional practices PARCC is made up of a strong core of committed states that are planning for the future.

  9. PARCC Accessibility System * For students with disabilities, English learners, and English learners with disabilities

  10. Accessibility Features – Turned On in Advance • Small number of students requiring additional accessibility • The types of accessibility features are identified in advance through an individual plan

  11. Accessibility Features Identified in Advance

  12. PARCC Accommodations Accommodations listed on IWAS Student Logins with State ID Computer Accommodates for Student

  13. Blue Prints and Evidence Tables Structuring the Assessments

  14. What are Evidence Tables? Evidence statement tables and evidence statements describe the knowledge and skills that an assessment item or a task elicits from students.  These are aligned directly to the Common Core State Standards, and highlight their advances especially around the coherent nature of the standards. We will review an example in a few slides. All tables can be retrieved in PDF form at the bottom of this page: http://parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs

  15. What are Blueprints? Blueprintsare a series of documents that together describe the content and structure of an assessment. These documents define the total number of tasks and/or items for any given assessment component, the standards measured, the item types, and the point values for each We review an example in a few slides. Again, all blueprints can be retrieved in PDF form at the bottom of this page: http://parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs

  16. QUIZ TIME Checking for Understanding

  17. Mathematics Expressing Understanding through Communicating Critical Ideas

  18. Assessment Structure

  19. Sub-Claim D: Highlighted Practice MP.4 with Connections to Content (modeling/application) The student solves real-world problems with a degree of difficulty appropriate to the grade/course by applying knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for the current grade/course (or for more complex problems, knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for previous grades/courses), engaging particularly in the Modeling practice, and where helpful making sense of problems and persevering to solve them (MP. 1),reasoning abstractly and quantitatively (MP. 2), using appropriate tools strategically (MP.5), looking for and making use of structure (MP.7), and/or looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning (MP.8). Claims Structure: Mathematics Sub-Claim B: Additional & Supporting Content2 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Additional and Supporting Content2 for her grade/course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Sub-Claim E: Fluency in applicable grades (3-6) The student demonstrates fluency as set forth in the Standards for Mathematical Content in her grade. Sub-Claim A: Major Content1 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Major Content1 for her grade/course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career ready (or “on-track” to being ready) in mathematics. The student solves grade-level /course-level problems in mathematics as set forth in the Standards for Mathematical Content with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice.  Total Exam Score Points: 82 (Grades 3-8), 97 or 107(HS) Sub-Claim C: Highlighted Practices MP.3,6 with Connections to Content3 (expressing mathematical reasoning) The student expresses grade/course-level appropriate mathematical reasoning by constructing viable arguments, critiquing the reasoning of others, and/or attending to precision when making mathematical statements. ~37 pts (3-8), ~42 pts (HS) ~14 pts (3-8), ~23 pts (HS) 14 pts (3-8), 14 pts (HS) 4 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR) 7-9 pts (3-6) 12 pts (3-8), 18 pts (HS) 6 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR)

  20. Types of Questions

  21. Design of Assessments • Performance Based Assessment (PBA) • Type I items (Machine-scorable) • Type II items (Mathematical Reasoning/Hand-Scored – scoring rubrics are drafted but PLD development will inform final rubrics) • Type III items (Mathematical Modeling/Hand-Scored and/or Machine-scored - scoring rubrics are drafted but PLD development will inform final rubrics) • End-of-Year Assessment (EOY) • Type I items only (All Machine-scorable)

  22. Specific Types by Assessment

  23. QUIZ TIME Checking for Understanding

  24. ELA Expressing Understanding through Communicating Critical Ideas

  25. Assessment Structure

  26. Types of Tasks Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) Prose Constructed Response (PCR) Evidence Based Selected Response (EBSR) Technology Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR) End of Year (EOY) Assessment Evidence Based Selected Response (EBSR) Technology Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR)

  27. Claims for ELA/Literacy

  28. QUIZ TIME Checking for Understanding

More Related