1 / 30

Chapter 14: Protection

Chapter 14: Protection. Objectives. Discuss the goals and principles of protection in a modern computer system Explain how protection domains combined with an access matrix are used to specify the resources a process may access Examine capability and language-based protection systems.

zea
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 14: Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 14: Protection

  2. Objectives • Discuss the goals and principles of protection in a modern computer system • Explain how protection domains combined with an access matrix are used to specify the resources a process may access • Examine capability and language-based protection systems

  3. Goals of Protection • Operating system consists of a collection of objects, hardware or software • Each object has a unique name and can be accessed through a well-defined set of operations. • Protection problem - ensure that each object is accessed correctly and only by those processes that are allowed to do so.

  4. Principles of Protection • Guiding principle – principle of least privilege • Programs, users and systems should be given just enough privileges to perform their tasks

  5. Domain Structure • Access-right = <object-name, rights-set>where rights-set is a subset of all valid operations that can be performed on the object. • Domain = set of access-rights

  6. Associating a process to a domain • Static If we want to adhere to a least privilege policy, we must be able to change the contents of a domain to avoid giving a process more rights than necessary. The process is assigned a domain and the contents of this domain change over the lifetime of the process • Dynamic Enable a process to switch from one domain to another. More complex!

  7. Domain Implementation (UNIX) • System consists of 2 domains: • User • Supervisor • UNIX • Domain = user-id • Domain switch accomplished via file system. • Each file has associated with it a domain bit (setuid bit). • When file is executed and setuid = on, then user-id is set to owner of the file being executed. When execution completes user-id is reset.

  8. Domain Implementation (MULTICS) • Let Di and Djbe any two domain rings. • If j < I Di  Dj

  9. Access Matrix • View protection as a matrix (access matrix) • Rows represent domains • Columns represent objects • Access(i, j) is the set of operations that a process executing in Domaini can invoke on Objectj

  10. Access Matrix

  11. Use of Access Matrix • If a process in Domain Ditries to do “op” on object Oj, then “op” must be in the access matrix. • Can be expanded to dynamic protection. • Operations to add, delete access rights. • Special access rights: • owner of Oi • copy op from Oi to Oj • control – Di can modify Dj access rights • transfer – switch from domain Di to Dj

  12. Access Matrix of Figure A With Domains as Objects Figure B

  13. Copy • Rights with a * can be copied from one domain (row) to another • Example D2 with the right read for F2 in the next slide • Two variants • A right can be copied from access(i, j) to access(k, j) and then removed from access (i, j) – transfer • Propagation of the copy may be restricted – with R* is copied, R is created

  14. Access Matrix with Copy Rights

  15. Owner • Allows addition and removal of rights • If Access(i, j) contains owner then a process executing in domain Di can add and remove any entry in column j

  16. Access Matrix With Owner Rights

  17. Control Control • Copy and Owner allowed changes to a column • Control applicable only to Domain objects • If access(i, j) includes the control right, then a process in Domain Di can remove any right in row j

  18. Access Matrix of Figure A With Domains as Objects Figure B

  19. Modified Access Matrix of Figure B

  20. Use of Access Matrix (Cont.) • Access matrix design separates mechanism from policy. • Mechanism • Operating system provides access-matrix + rules. • If ensures that the matrix is only manipulated by authorized agents and that rules are strictly enforced. • Policy • User dictates policy. • Who can access what object and in what mode.

  21. Implementation of Access Matrix • Each column = Access-control list for one object Defines who can perform what operation. Domain 1 = Read, Write Domain 2 = Read Domain 3 = Read • Each Row = Capability List (like a key)Fore each domain, what operations allowed on what objects. Object 1 – Read Object 4 – Read, Write, Execute Object 5 – Read, Write, Delete, Copy

  22. Implementing an Access Matrix • Mostly sparse matrix • Global Table – set of ordered triplets <domain, object, rights> Large. Cannot be kept in memory • Access Lists for Objects. List for each object contains <Domain,rights> • Capability Lists for Domains, <Object, Operation>

  23. Access Control • Protection can be applied to non-file resources • Solaris 10 provides role-based access control to implement least privilege • Privilege is right to execute system call or use an option within a system call • Can be assigned to processes • Users assigned roles granting access to privileges and programs

  24. Role-based Access Control in Solaris 10

  25. Revocation of Access Rights • Access List – Delete access rights from access list. • Simple • Immediate • Capability List – Scheme required to locate capability in the system before capability can be revoked. • Reacquisition • Back-pointers • Indirection • Keys

  26. Capability-Based Systems • Hydra • Fixed set of access rights known to and interpreted by the system. • Interpretation of user-defined rights performed solely by user's program; system provides access protection for use of these rights. • Cambridge CAP System • Data capability - provides standard read, write, execute of individual storage segments associated with object. • Software capability -interpretation left to the subsystem, through its protected procedures.

  27. Language-Based Protection • Specification of protection in a programming language allows the high-level description of policies for the allocation and use of resources. • Language implementation can provide software for protection enforcement when automatic hardware-supported checking is unavailable. • Interpret protection specifications to generate calls on whatever protection system is provided by the hardware and the operating system.

  28. Protection in Java 2 • Protection is handled by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) • A class is assigned a protection domain when it is loaded by the JVM. • The protection domain indicates what operations the class can (and cannot) perform. • If a library method is invoked that performs a privileged operation, the stack is inspected to ensure the operation can be performed by the library.

  29. Stack Inspection

  30. End of Chapter 14

More Related