1 / 25

OSEP – Results -Driven Accountability

Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements. R DA.

zeal
Télécharger la présentation

OSEP – Results -Driven Accountability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilitiesversus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements. RDA All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families. OSEP – Results-Driven Accountability

  2. OSEP – RDA Leadership Collaboration Accountability Technical Assistance Strands of Action

  3. Support provided to select sites. Services are a negotiated set of activities designed to reach a valued outcome. Intensive Support provided to multiple sites based on common needs in a few specific areas. Targeted Services include the distribution of resources with or without a direct request for the info. Universal Results-Driven Accountability

  4. OSEP – RDA SPP/APR measures compliance and results Determinations reflect performance for results and compliance Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance that supports improvement

  5. State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) New OSEP Proposed Indicator A comprehensive, multi-year plan, moving from individual indicator improvement activities to broad strategies focused on improving results for students with an IEP. Will be used in determinations FFY 2013 to FFY 2018 SSIP A “significant piece of work” Comprehensive, ambitious yet achievable plan

  6. SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Data Analysis Identification of the Focus for Improvement Infrastructure to Support Improvement & Build Capacity Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) To determine the areas for improvement • Report analysis methodology, data quality issues, additional data needs • Identify compliance issues that are barriers to achieving improved student results

  7. SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Data Analysis Identification of the Focus for Improvement Infrastructure to Support Improvement & Build Capacity Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) • Identification of the Focus for Improvement • Describe strategies that will lead to a measureable student-based result • Demonstrate how strategies will build LEA capacity to improve student results

  8. SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Data Analysis Identification of the Focus for Improvement Infrastructure to Support Improvement & Build Capacity Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) • Describe within the State System regarding: • Decision-making process • Representatives that must be involved in planning for systematic improvements

  9. SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Data Analysis Identification of the Focus for Improvement Infrastructure to Support Improvement & Build Capacity Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) • State analyzed capacity of its current system to implement & sustain evidence-based practices (state & district level) • Strengths, weaknesses, & coordination of governance, fiscal, quality standards, PD, data, TA & accountability • Analysis of any initiatives in the State which may impact SWIs

  10. SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Data Analysis Identification of the Focus for Improvement Infrastructure to Support Improvement & Build Capacity Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) • Based on the State-identified, measurable improvement in results for SWI • Describe the strategies & outcomes that will need to be met to achieve the identified results • Describe the changes in the State System, districts, & schools and provider practices that must occur to achieve the identified results

  11. SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) Infrastructure Development Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Evaluation Plan

  12. SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) Infrastructure Development Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Evaluation Plan

  13. SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) Infrastructure Development Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Evaluation Plan

  14. SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017) Results of Ongoing Evaluation Revisions to SPP

  15. SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017) Results of Ongoing Evaluation Revisions to SPP

  16. How does it affect me? Today: Suggest Areas for Analysis Future: Provide Input During All Phases

  17. A Responsive, Durable System…

  18. Draft Action Timelines

More Related